Joseph Yakovlevich Ryzhkin
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article describes the work of a well-known Russian musicologist – Joseph Ryzhkin (1907-2007). The author examines the key achievements of the scholar: his first in the USSR study (carried out in collaboration with L. Mazel’) of history of the music theory; his developing of categories of artistic image and music’s intonation, as well as the study of the interactions of music theory and aesthetics; the study of symphonism; and the last but not the lease, his methodology of integral understanding of music, created by I. Ryzhkin in collaboration with his colleagues L. Mazel, L. Kulakovskii, V. Zuckerman.
Keywords: Joseph Ryzhkin, Soviet and Russian musicology, artistic image, intonation, symphonism, integrity, integral analysis, music theory, aesthetics
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Iglitskaya I., Podosenova E. K 100-letiyu I. Ya. Ryzhkina // Muzykovedenie. – 2007. – № 6. – S. 65-68.
3. Konson G. Vzaimodeystvie intonatsii i obraza v tselostnom analize I. Ryzhkina // Vestnik Kost-romskogo gos. un-ta. T. 16. – 2009. – № 4 (oktyabr'-dekabr'). – S. 199-212.
4. Konson G. Vzaimoproniknovenie opernoy teatral'nosti i simfonizma kak ob"ekt muzykal'nogo analiza L. A. Mazelya i I. Ya. Ryzhkina // Teatr, zhivopis', kino, muzyka / gl. red. K. Melik-Pashaeva. – M.: RATI-GITIS, 2009. – № 1. – S. 206-216.
5. Konson G. Traktovka simfonizma Borisom Asaf'evym i Iosifom Ryzhkinym // Muzykovedenie. – 2009. – № 2. – S. 2-7.
6. Konson G. Tselostnyy analiz v kontekste nauchnoy metodologii // Muzykal'naya akademiya. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 140-150.
7. Mazel' L., Ryzhkin I. Ocherki po istorii teoreticheskogo muzykoznaniya. – M.; L.: Muzgiz, 1939. – Vyp. 2.
8. Mazel' L., Tsukkerman V. Analiz muzykal'nykh proizvedeniy. Elementy muzyki i metodika analiza malykh form. – M.: Muzyka, 1967.
9. Ryzhkin I. Vzaimootnoshenie obrazov v muzykal'nom proizvedenii i klassifikatsiya tak nazyvaemykh «muzykal'nykh form» (kompozitsionno-strukturnykh tipov) // Voprosy muzykoznaniya. – M.: Muzgiz, 1955. – Vyp. 2. – S. 201-245.
10. Ryzhkin I. Vzaimosvyaz' lichnosti i obshchestva i esteticheskiy ideal sovetskogo opernogo tvorchestva // Voprosy teorii i estetiki muzyki: sb. st. / red. kol. Yu. Kremlev (otv. red.), L. Raaben, F. Rubtsov. – M.; L.: Muzyka, 1964. – Vyp. 3.
11. Ryzhkin I. Gumanizm i elitarnost' vozzreniy Adorno (k problemam sotsial'noy obuslovlennosti muzyki i ee istinnosti) // Esteticheskie problemy muzykoznaniya: sb. tr. / otv. red. E. Fedosova. – M.: GMPI im. Gnesinykh, 1988. – Vyp. 97. – S. 44-62.
12. Ryzhkin I. Zadachi sovetskogo simfonizma // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1935. – № 6. – S. 3-27.
13. Ryzhkin I. Zametki na polyakh st. L. Geninoy «Zametki o muzykal'nom obraze» // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1958. – № 7. – S. 59-68. – Arkhiv I. Ryzhkina.
14. Ryzhkin I. «Istoriya ucheniy o garmonii» (o knige Lyus'ena Sheval'e) // Proletarskiy muzykant. – 1931. – S. 39-43.
15. Ryzhkin I. Klassicheskaya teoriya (Zh.-F. Ramo) // Ryzhkin I., Mazel' L. Ocherki po istorii teoreticheskogo muzykoznaniya. – M.: Muzgiz, 1934. – Vyp. 1.
16. Ryzhkin I. Konkretnost' i obobshchennost' muzykal'nogo obraza // Voprosy muzykoznaniya. Ezhegodnik / red. A. Ogolevets. – M.: Muzgiz, 1956. –Vyp. 2. – S. 229-252.
17. Ryzhkin I. Logicheskie stupeni istorii muzykal'nogo iskusstva // Protsessy muzykal'nogo tvorchestva: sb. tr. № 160 / red.-sost. E. Vyazkova; RAM im. Gnesinykh. – M., 2002. – Vyp. 5. – S. 233-250.
18. Ryzhkin I. «Menuet» Taneeva (O khudozhestvennom obraze) // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1934. – № 4. – S. 62-75.
19. Ryzhkin I. Muzykal'naya faustiana XX veka // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1990. – № 2. – S. 31-48.
20. Ryzhkin I. Obraznaya kompozitsiya muzykal'nogo proizvedeniya // Intonatsiya i muzykal'nyy obraz / obshch. red. B. Yarustovskogo. – M.: Muzgiz, 1965. – C. 187-224.
21. Ryzhkin I. «Nos» Shostakovicha i povest' Gogolya // Shostakovich. Problemy stilya / RAM im. Gne-sinykh. – M., 2003. – S. 53-75.
22. Ryzhkin I. O sushchnosti opery «Nos» // Muzykal'naya akademiya. – 1997. – № 1. S. 83-95.
23. Ryzhkin I. Ocherk o garmonii // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1940. – № 3. – S. 47-66.
24. Ryzhkin I. Pererastanie intonatsiy v melos // Muzykal'noe iskusstvo. Ispolnitel'stvo. Peda-gogika. Muzykoznanie: sb. nauch.-metod. st. / otv. red. M. Skrebkova-Filatova. – M.: Gos. spets. institut is-kusstv, 2004. – S. 58-63.
25. Ryzhkin I. Put' pravdy // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1958. – № 9. – S. 61-71.
26. Ryzhkin I. Russkoe klassicheskoe muzykoznanie v bor'be protiv formalizma. – M.; L.: Muzyka, 1951.
27. Ryzhkin I. Syuzhetnaya dramaturgiya betkhovenskogo simfonizma (pyataya i devyataya simfoniya) // Bet-khoven: sb. st. / red.-sost. N. Fishman. – M.: Muzyka, 1972. – Vyp. 2. S. 101-160.
28. Ryzhkin I. Syuzhetnaya simfoniya [O 5-y simfonii Betkhovena] // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1947. – № 2. – S. 51-65.
29. Ryzhkin I. Traditsionnaya shkola teorii muzyki // Sovetskaya muzyka. –1933. – № 3. – S. 74-98.
30. Ryzhkin I. Tretiy put' i «doktrina» Pushkina-Mitskevicha // Perspektivy / gl. red. Z. Apresyan. – 1991. – № 6. – S. 7-8.
31. Ryzhkin I. Chetyre rukopisnye tetradi konspektov i zamechaniy po knige E. Orlovoy «Intona-tsionnaya teoriya Asaf'eva kak uchenie o spetsifike muzykal'nogo myshleniya. Istoriya. Stanovlenie. Sushchnost'». – M., 1984. – 123 s. – Rukopis' khranitsya v lichnom arkhive I. Ryzhkina.
32. Ryzhkin I. Shestaya simfoniya Chaykovskogo. O trekh «planakh» russkoy muzykal'noy klassiki: is-toricheskom, epicheskom i psikhologo-dramaticheskom // Sovetskaya muzyka. – 1946. – № 1. – S. 70-83.
33. Ryzhkin I. Esteticheskie vzglyady Rimskogo-Korsakova na tselostnyy okhvat edinogo mira, ego kontrastnykh storon − slyshimoy (muzyka) i vidimoy (zhivopis'), k sootnosheniyu neposredstvennogo i oposredovannogo v tvorcheskikh svidetel'stvakh muzykal'nogo iskusstva o cheloveke i prirode // N. A. Rimskiy-Korsakov. Cherty stilya: sb. st. / sost. E. Aleksandrova. – L.: SPb. gos. kons. im. N. A. Rimskogo-Korsakova, 1995. – S. 4-20.
34. Ryzhkin I., Mazel' L. Ocherki po istorii teoreticheskogo muzykoznaniya. – M.: Muzgiz, 1934. – Vyp. 1.
35. Kholopov Yu. O formakh postizheniya muzykal'nogo bytiya // Voprosy filosofii. – 1993. – № 4. – S. 106-114.
36. Kholopov Yu. Muzykal'no-teoreticheskie sistemy: uchebnik dlya istoriko-teoreticheskikh i kom-pozitorskikh fakul'tetov muz. vuzov / Yu. Kholopov, L. Kirillina, T. Kyuregyan, G. Lyzhov, R. Pospelova, V. Tsenova. – M.: Kompozitor, 2006.
37. Yarustovskiy B. O muzykal'nom obraze // Sovetskaya muzyka: sb. st. – M.: Sov. kompozitor, 1954. – S. 5-62.