About the Genre Specificity of Instructive and Concert Vocalises
Main Article Content
Abstract
A unique branch of vocal performance is formed by specimens of the “wordless” vocalise – a musical genre
formed in the countries of Western Europe and in Russia towards the mid-18th century. Situated beyond the perimeter
of musicological thought, it nonetheless conceals numerous riddles. The latter include the structural and sematic
organization of its two varieties: the instructive and the concert vocalises. Pertaining to one category, they remain
individualized in their means of presentation and the specificity of their performance and, consequently, in the tasks
which are set before the vocalist. Their expressive potential is formed in the process of interaction of musical and
non-musical components, which require thorough attention. A separate problem is posed by the study of the genesis
and historical evolution of the genre in the direction from applied specimens (the instructive vocalise) to artistic
examples (the concert vocalise). The specificity of the vocal melody in vocalises is revealed through the prism of
interaction between the acoustic, technical and expressive characteristic features of the singer’s voice performing
and the vocal “orphoepy.” A typical feature for vocalises pertaining to the Russian and Western European vocal
schools is its melismatically melodic thematicism. It is examined in the article in close connection with the varied
forms of vocal and instrumental practice of music-making.
Keywords: musical genres, instructive and concert vocalises, the singer’s voice, thematicism, musical
compositions.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Alekseyeva I. V. The Study of Structural Organization of Monophonic and Polyphonic Musical Texts as an Issue of Musical Scholarship. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2017. No. 2 (27), pp. 110–117. DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2017.2.110-117.
3. Alekseeva I. V. The Functions of Instrumental Idioms in the Forming of Keyboard Music at the Time of Baroque. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2012. No. 1 (10), pp. 92–98.
4. Astrova L. I. Vokal'naya rech kak sintez slova i muzyki [Vocal Speech as a Synthesis of Word and Music]. Slovo i muzyka: sb. st. [Word and Music: A Collection of Articles] Comp. by E. I. Chigareva. Issue 2. Moscow, 2008, pp. 109–129.
5. Nazaykinskiy E. V. Rol' tembra v formirovanii temy i tematicheskogo razvitiya v usloviyakh imitatsionnoy polifonii. Istoriya v muzyke: izbr. issledovaniya [The Role of Timbre in the Formation of Themes and Thematic Development in the Context of Imitative Polyphony. History in Music: Selected Studies]. Moscow: Moskovskaya konservatoriya. 2009. 392 p.
6. Simonova E. R. Iskusstvo arii v ital'yanskom opernom barokko (ot renessansnoy kantsonetty k arii da capo): issledovaniye [The Art of Aria in the Italian Baroque Opera (from the Renaissance to the Aria da capo)]. Ufa: Ufa State Academy of Arts named after Zagir Ismagilov, 2005. 164 p.
7. Smirnov M. A. Russkaya fortepiannaya muzyka [Russian Piano Music]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1983. 335 p.
8. Starcheus M. S. Novaya zhizn' zhanrovoy traditsii [A New Life of the Genre Tradition]. Muzykal'nyy sovremennik [Musical Contemporary]. Issue 6. Moscow, 1987, pp. 45–68.
9. Kholopova V. N. Muzyka kak vid iskusstva: ucheb. posobiye [Music as an Art Form: Tutorial]. Ed. by S. I. Ikonnikova. St. Petersburg: Lan, 2000. 320 p.
10. Shaymukhametova L. N. Semantika muzykal'nogo dialoga v klavirnykh proizvedeniyakh zapadnoevropeyskikh kompozitorov XVII–XVIII vv. [Semantics of Musical Dialogue in Clavier Works of West-European Composers of the XVII–XVIII Centuries]. Semantika starinnogo urteksta: sb. nauch. tr. [Semantics of the Ancient Uretext: Collection of Scientific Papers]. Laboratory of Musical Semantics of the Ufa State Institute of the Arts. Ufa, 2002, pp. 16–37.
11. Alliott Martha. Singing in Style. A Guide to Vocal Performance Practices. Yale University Press. Copyright, 2007. 361 p.
12. Patalini Alessandro. The School of the Breath. Anthology with Commentary, of the Testimony on the Breath of the Belcanto. Published by Zecchini. January, 2015. 289 p.
13. Stark James. Bel Canto: A History of Vocal Pedagogy. University of Toronto Press; Toronto Buffalo London: Reprinted, 2003. 327 p.
14. Shaymukhametova Liudmila N. The Migrating Intonational Formula as a Phenomenon of Musical Thinking. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2017. No. 1, pp. 61–73. DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2017.1.061-073.