Igor Stravinsky’s Symphonic Poem “The Song of the Nightingale”
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The symphonic poem “The Song of the Nightingale” or “Le chant du rossignol” (1917) was written by Igor
Stravinsky on the basis of his opera “Le rossignol” (“The Nightingale”). In his version for orchestra the composer
concentrated his attention on the leading thematicism and was able to present the music in purely instrumental timbres
in a more colorful and relief manner, and for this reason the composition turned into a more significant one from the
point of view of artistry. The determinant quality of the symphonic poem “The Song of the Nightingale” is the world
and man in the primordial state of their manifestation. In a relatively compact musical space the composer was able to
recreate numerous diverse planes of the initial musical idea. The primordial spirit is not so apparent in the genre-related
characteristic sphere. But Stravinsky seems not to aestheticize the living material from the positions of academic art,
but pours it out in all of its naturalness, passing it onto the score “alive,” – from hence comes the acerbic sappiness
of the colors of the bazaar. The “Scythian” quality as the most important expression of the initial musical element
obtained an unexpected and sharp turn here. When composing the opera based on the motives of Hans Christian
Andersen’s well-known fairytale, naturally, Stravinsky developed the urge to correlate its color with the geography of
the plot. Notwithstanding all of its conventionality, the sound solution of a number of episodes is rather unambiguously
associated with the trite perception of the East, however the most essential element consisted in replication a special
plane of the Russian national nature in its juxtapositions with the Scythian and Central Asian elements, as well as what
was inherited from the Mongol-Tatar yoke. The most direct relation to the initial sides of existence is born by the life
of the subconscious recreated in the symphonic poem “The Song of the Nightingale.” For the sake of immersion into
this sphere, the composer chose as his prerequisites the stages of dream, forgetfulness, slumberous reverie, which turn
into an impulse for a turnabout of the life of instincts, carried out in the depths of the psyche. And the whole presents
itself in motion from dynamism of a festive motion, of military processions and the vivacity of fairytale images to
the staticity of reverie and oblivion. And behind the motion from dynamism to staticity there is a certain semantic
implication present, reflecting the local historical-artistic situation of the second half of the 1910s: after the avant-garde
boom of bold initiatives and a burst of innovations of the first half of that decade there was a temporary departure from
the extremities of “storm and stress.”
Keywords: Stravinsky’s early music, the symphonic poem “The Song of the Nightingale,” 20th century music.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Demchenko A. I. Balet I. Stravinskogo «Vesna svyashchennaya». Opyt kontseptsionnogo analiza [Stravinsky's Ballet “The Rite of Spring”. The Experience of Conceptual Analysis]. Moscow: Kompozitor, 2000. 96 p.
3. Demchenko A. I. Kartina mira v muzykal'nom iskusstve Rossii nachala veka [A Picture of the World in the Musical Art of Russia at the Beginning of the Century]. Moscow: Kompozitor, 2005. 264 p.
4. Demchenko A. I. Mirovaya khudozhestvennaya kul'tura kak sistemnoe tseloe [World Artistic Culture as a Systematic Whole]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2010. 528 p.
5. Druskin M. S. Igor' Stravinskiy [Igor Stravinsky]. Druskin M. S. Sobr. soch. V 7 t. T. 4. [Collected Works in 7 Volumes. Vol. 4]. St. Petersburg: Kompozitor, 2009, pp. 31–286.
6. Zhdanova E. I. «Zhar-ptitsa» I. Stravinskogo [“The Firebird” by Igor Stravinsky]. Muzyka v sovremennom mire [Music in the Modern World]. Tambov, 2013, pp. 397–406.
7. Kurchenko A. Р. «Skifstvo» v russkoy muzyke nachala ХХ veka [The “Scythian” Element in Russian Music of the Early Twentieth Century]. Iz istorii russkoy i sovetskoy muzyki [From the History of Russian and Soviet Music]. Issue 2. Moscow: Muzyka, 1976, pp. 170–195.
8. Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1968. 900 p.
9. Russkaya muzyka i XX vek [Russian Music and the 20th Century]. Moscow: State Institute of Art Studies, 1997. 874 p.
10. Savenko S. I. Mir Stravinskogo [The World of Stravinsky]. Moscow: Kompozitor, 2001. 328 p.
11. Smirnov V. V. Tvorcheskoe formirovanie I. F. Stravinskogo [The Creative Formation of Igor Stravinsky]. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1970. 152 p.
12. Stravinskiy – publitsist i sobesednik [Stravinsky – Publicist and Interlocutor]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1988. 504 p.
13. Stravinskiy I. F. Khronika moey zhizni [Chronicles of my Life]. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1963. 368 p.
14. Yarustovskiy B. M. Igor' Stravinskiy [Igor Stravinsky]. Moscow: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1969. 320 p.
15. Bubushkin D. The Correspondence of Vera and Igor Stravinsky. London: Thames a. Hudson, 1985. 239 p.
16. Elliot D. New Worlds, Russian Art and Society 1900–1937. London, 1986. 280 p.
17. Taruskin R. On Russian Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010. 416 p.
18. Taruskin R. Stravinsky and the Russian traditions. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1996. 188 p.
19. White E. W. Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. 480 p.