The Theory of Variant Form in Russian Musicology: The Stages of Formation, the Conceptual Framework
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to the theory of variant form formed in Russian musicology in the 20th century, study of
which makes it possible to comprehend more profoundly the broad circle of musical phenomena pertaining to various
categories of folk and professional music. Three main stages of formation and elaboration of the theory of variant form
are indicated, the most important categories revealing the specific features of the given phenomenon are examined and
defined.
The early stage (from the late 19th century through the first third of the 20th century) is marked by the introduction
by Hugo Riemann – for the first time in the history of music theory – of the conception of the variant (1886), and
the first generalizations about the variant form, as presented in Boris Asafiev’s monograph “Muzykal’naya forma
kak protsess” [“Musical Form as a Process”] (1930), are analyzed. The second stage – the central or “classic” (from
the mid-1950s to the late 1970s) – is determined by a rampant development of the theory of the variation and variant
form, the appearance of the works of Leo Mazel and Victor Tsukkerman, Boris Sosnovtsev and Irina Lavrentyeva,
Victor Bobrovsky and Vladimir Protopopov, Mikhail Tarakanov and other music theorists. As the result of study
of compositional, depictive-dramaturgical, and intonational regular laws of vocal genres of Russian and Western
European music, the theoretic foundations of variant form and its conceptual framework are formed definitively, the
specific features of the variant method of development are determined. The third, contemporary period (from the late
20th century to our days) is characterized by a further expansion of the categorical apparatus, the creation of new
textbooks in analysis of musical form, and research works in which the theoretical comprehension of the phenomenon
of variant form, the variant method of development reflects the tendency of individualization of structures in the
situation of stylistic pluralism (works by Vera Valkova, Vsevolod Zaderatsky and others).
Keywords: variant, variant form, free-variant development-unfolding, variant intergrowth, method of thematically
concentrated unfolding, dynamic contrast-variant form, variant integration of the highest order.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Bobrovskiy V. P. O dvukh metodakh tematicheskogo razvitiya v simfoniyakh i kvartetakh Shostakovicha [About Two Methods of Musical Development in the Symphonies and Quartets by Shostakovich]. Dmitriy Shostakovich [Dmitry Shostakovich]. Comp. by G. Sh. Ordzhonikidze. Moscow, 1967, pp. 359–396.
3. Bobrovskiy V. P. O nekotorykh printsipakh temo- i formoobrazovaniya v simfoniyakh i kamerno-instrumental'noy muzyke Shostakovicha [About Certain Principles of Theme and Form Generation in Shostakovich’s Symphonies and Chamber Instrumental Music]. V. P. Bobrovskiy. Stat'i. Issledovaniya [V. P. Bobrovsky. Articles. Research Works]. Comp. by E. R. Skurko, E. I. Chigareva. Moscow, 1990, pp. 159–204.
4. Bobrovskiy V. P. Funktsional'nye osnovy muzykal'noy formy [The Functional Foundations of Musical Form]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1978. 334 p.
5. Val'kova V. B. The “Dispressed Theme”: The Paths of Russian Musical Scholarship in the Mirror Reflection of the History of One Consept. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2015. No. 2, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2015.2.19.016-021.
6. Zhossan N. Yu. Realization of Folklor in Perspective of Postmodernism (on the Material of Russian Music of Second Half оf the 20th Century). Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2016. No. 2, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2016.2.025-034.
7. Zaderatskiy V. V. Muzykal'naya forma. Vyp. 1 [Musical Form. Issue 1]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1995. 544 p.
8. Kyuregyan T. S. Netipovye formy v sovetskoy muzyke 50–60-kh godov [Atypical Forms in Soviet Music of the 1950s and 1960s]. Problemy muzykal'noy nauki. Vyp. 7 [Issues of Musical Science. Issue 7]. Comp. by V. I. Zak, E. I. Chigareva. Moscow, 1989, pp. 71–89.
9. Lavrent'eva I. V. Variantnost' i variantnaya forma v pesennykh tsiklakh Shuberta [Variance and Variant Form in the Vocal Cycles by Schubert]. Ot Lyulli do nashikh dney [From Lully up to the Present Day]. Comp. by V. D. Konen. Moscow, 1967, pp. 33–70.
10. Lavrent'eva I. V. Vliyanie pesennosti na formoobrazovanie v simfoniyakh Shuberta (k voprosu o vzaimodeystvii vokal'nykh i instrumental'nykh form v pesennom simfonizme) [The Influence of Song Melodiousness on the Creation of Form in Schubert’s Symphonies (Concerning the Question of Vocal and Instrumental Interaction in Song-Inspired Symphonic Writing)]. O muzyke. Problemy analisa [About Music. Issues of Analysis]. Comp. by V. P. Bobrovskiy, G. L. Golovinskiy. Moscow, 1974, pp. 164–194.
11. Lavrent'eva I. V. Vokal'nye formy v kurse analiza muzykal'nykh proizvedeniy [The Vocal Forms in a Course of Analysis of Musical Compositions]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1978. 80 p.
12. Mazel' L. A. O melodii [About Melody]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1952. 300 p.
13. Protopopov V. V. Variatsionnye protsessy v muzykal'noy forme [Variation-Related Processes in Musical Form]. Moscow: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1967. 151 p.
14. Protopopov V. V. Variatsionnyy metod razvitiya tematizma v muzyke Shopena [The Variation Method of the Development of Thematicism in the Music of Frederic Chopin]. Friderik Shopen [Frederic Chopin]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1960, pp. 232–296.
15. Skurko E. R. K voprosu formoobrazovaniya v instrumental'noy muzyke S. Rakhmaninova [Concerning the Question of Form Creation in Instrumental Music by Sergei Rachmaninoff]. Muzykal'naya akademiya [Musical Academy]. 2014. No. 3, pp. 116–120.
16. Skurko E. R. O zhanrovo-stilisticheskikh predposylkakh variantnosti v instrumental'noy muzyke S. V. Rakhmaninova [About the Genre-Related and Stylistic Premises of the Variant-Related Method of Development in the Instrumental Music of Sergei Rachmaninoff]. S. V. Rakhmaninov. K 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya: materialy nauchnoy konferentsii [S. V. Rachmaninoff. Towards to 120th Anniversary of His Birth: Proceedings of the Scholarly Conference]. Ed. by A. I. Kandinskiy. Scholarly works of the Moscow Tchaikovsky Conservatory. Issue 7. Moscow, 1995, pp. 147–154.
17. Skurko E. R. Sergey Rachmaninoff’s Variations for Piano: Concerning the Question of Interpretation the Genre. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2016. No. 2, pp. 50–56. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2016.2.050-056.
18. Sosnovtsev B. A. Variantnaya forma [Variant-Related Form]. Nauchno-metodicheskie zapiski Saratovskoy konservatorii [Scholarly-Methodical Notes of the Saratov Conservatory]. Ed. by A. I. Bystrov. Saratov, 1957, pp. 58–65.
19. Tarakanov M. E. Stil' simfoniy Prokof'eva [The Style of Prokofiev’s Symphonies]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1968. 432 p.
20. Tsenova V. S. K teorii sovremennoy muzykal'noy kompozitsii [Towards the Theory of Contemporary Musical Composition]. Sovetskaya muzyka [Soviet Music]. 1991. No. 9, pp. 87–99.
21. Tsukkerman V. A. Analiz muzykal'nykh proizvedeniy. Variatsionnaya forma [Analysis of Musical Works. Variation Form]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1974. 234 p.
22. Tsukkerman V. A. «Kamarinskaya» Glinki i ee traditsii v russkoy muzyke [The “Kamarinskaya” by Mikhail Glinka and Its Traditions in Russian Music]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1957. 498 p.