The Carnivalization of the Persona Archetype in Giuseppe Verdi’s opera “Falstaff”
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of the concept of the “archetype” has become relevant in many spheres of scientific knowledge.
The article demonstrates the “persona archetype” as a “directed trend” (according to Carl Jung) of the organization
of the carnival model of culture in Giuseppe Verdi’s opera “Falstaff.” A key for the disclosure of the essence of
the archetype in this musical composition is presented by Carl Jung’s theory of psychoanalysis, Mikhail Bakhtin’s
semiotic theory of the carnival, the theoretical foundation of the archetype as Alla Bolshakova’s concept of culture,
and Liudmila Shaymukhametova’s theory of “migrating intonational formulas”. The core of the persona archetype in
the opera is demonstrated by the ethno-national mythologem of Zeus the deer. The genesis of the transformation of the
main protagonist is contained in the myths narrating of the metamorphoses of the chief god of the Olympic Pantheon.
The persona archetype is actualized on the extra-musical (verbal) and intra-musical – i.e. the morphological and lexical
level. The image of the persona is disclosed by such universal spatial archetypes as those of home vs. traveling, as
well as the temporal archetypes of day vs. night. The noospheric intergrowth of the basic, supra-national archetype
actualizes the constellation of variable archetypes: the cultural hero, warrior, knight, Don Juan, anti-hero, trickster, fool
(jester), simpleton, eccentric, king of the carnival, wise old man, and carnival laugh. A semantic musical analysis of the
archetype presents the opera as a creative laboratory in which the persona, by modeling his or her image, admixtures
the masks and stylistic costumes of various epochs. The stereotypes of genre, texture, intonation and rhythm are
interpreted by the composer from the perspectives of parody. The metamorphoses of carnivalization represent the
opposite poles of the archetype of the human soul: the trickster vs. the king of the carnival, the anti-hero vs. the hero,
Don Juan vs. a simpleton, a knight vs. a fool, a wise old man vs. a jester and eccentric.
Keywords: Giuseppe Verdi, Falstaff, carnival model of culture, the mythologem of Zeus, the persona archetype,
migrating intonational formulas.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Bol’shakova A. Yu. Arkhetip – kontsept – kul’tura [Archetype – Concept – Culture]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. 2010. No. 7, pp. 47–57.
3. Verdi Dzh. Izbrannye pis’ma [Verdi, Giuseppe. Selected Letters]. Compilation, Translation, Introduction and Notes by A. D. Bushen. Moscow: Muzgiz, 1959. 647 p.
4. Verdi Dzh. Fal’staf [Noty]: liricheskaya komediya v 3 deistviyakh [Verdi, G. Falstaff [Notes]: A Lyrical Comedy in 3 Acts]. Libretto by A. Boito; Russian text by N. Konchalovskaya. Piano-Vocal Score. Moscow: Muzgiz, 1963. 376 p.
5. Kirillina L. V. Klassicheskiy stil’ v muzyke XVIII – nachala XIX veka. Ch.3. Poetika i stilistika [The Classical Style in the Music of the 18th and Early 19th Centuries. Part 3. Poetics and Stylistics]. Moscow: Kompozitor, 2007. 376 p.
6. Konen V. D. Teatr i simfoniya. Rol’ opery v formirovanii klassicheskoy simfonii [The Theater and the Symphony. The Role of the Opera in the Formation of the Classical Symphony]. 2nd Edition. Moscow: Muzyka, 1975. 376 p.
7. Mann P. T. Freyd i budushchee. Nekruglaya godovshchina [Freud and the Future. An Asymmetrical Anniversary]. URL: https://knigogid.ru/books/221633-freyd-i-buduschee/toread/page-5 (10.05.2017).
8. Shaymukhametova L. N. Migriruyushchaya intonatsionnaya formula i semanticheskiy kontekst muzykal’noy temy [The Migratory Intonational Formula and the Semantic Context of Musical Theme]. Moscow: State Institute of Art, 1999. 318 p.
9. Yung K. G. O Vozrozhdenii. Psikhologiya Vozrozhdeniya [Jung C. G. Concerning the Renaissance. The Psychology of the Renaissance]. Yung K. G. Dusha i mif. Shest’ arkhetipov [Jung C. G. The Soul and Myth. Six Archetypes]. Translation from English. Kiev: State Library of Ukraine for Youth, 1996, pp. 165–182.
10. Yung K. G. O psikhologii obraza Trikstera [Jung C. G. Concerning the Psychology of the Trickster Image]. Ibid., pp. 214–226.
11. Yung K. G. Ob arkhetipakh kollektivnogo bessoznatel’nogo [Jung C. G. On the Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious]. Yung K. G. Arkhetip i simvol [Jung C. G. The Archetype and the Symbol]. 1991. URL: http://e-libra.ru/read/178510-arxetip-i-simvol.html (10.05.2017).