The Phonosphere of the Metropolis as a Phenomenon of Sound Synthesis: Concerning the Issue of Ecology of the Audio Environment
Main Article Content
Abstract
Civilization has brought powerful advances of sound from numerous artificially created sources of sound into
what was once the world of calm and harmony. They shape an aggressive synthetic field of sound and accompany
the life of the human being. The expenditures of technical progress have affected not only the natural ecological
environment, but also the cultural environment, part of which is formed by the sound content of the modern city.
Comprehending under the term of audio environment the sound continuum surrounding the human being, the author
examines the phonosphere of the city in diachronic truncation. Three of its historical models stand out: the ancient
Russian city, the city of the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and the contemporary metropolis. Research of the
latter model demonstrates that the sonic chaos of the contemporary urban space is comprised of numerous sources
of both noise-related and musical origins. In the massive predominating techno-phonations music ceases to be
perceived as an act of communication. The sonic picture of the world ends up being oversaturated, disharmonious
and fragmented. Provoking a rise of nervous tension and conditions of stress, it predisposes to absentmindedness,
creating the habit of discarding any audio-related information to the background or secondary mode. For the mass
consumer such an aural orientation predetermines the musical-stylistic preferences lying beyond the durably intoned
meanings inherent to the art of classical music. The meaningfulness of the sound information of the space of the
city as a constituent of the musical tradition of everyday life, as part of the ritual-ceremonial life cycle of man gives
place to the dominance of audio chaos. A professional sonic design of the urban space presents a path towards the
sanitation of the audio ecology of the city.
Keywords: the phonosphere, the city, ecology of the audio environment, sound picture of the world.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Dragun O. N. Shum i ego vozdeystvie na organizm [Noise and its Influence on the Organism]. URL: http://festival.1september.ru/articles/551712/ (14.05.2016).
3. Ierodiakon Roman. O sushchnosti russkogo kolokol'nogo zvona. «Zvuchashchaya ikona»: doklad na Simpoziume, posvyashchennom russkim kolokolam. Garvardskiy universitet (SShA), 1–2 iyunya 2008 [Concerning the Substance of the Russian Bell Chime. “The Sounding Icon”: Report of the Symposium dedicated to Russian Bells. Harvard University (USA), 1–2 June 2008]. URL: http://www.danilovbells.ru/bellsonrussia/articles/dyh_kolokolnogo_zvona_i_zvychani.html. (13.05.2016).
4. Imamutdinova Z. A. K yavleniyu fonosfery i muzykal'no-zvukovogo mira musul'manskogo goroda [Concerning the Phenomenon of the Phonosphere and the Audio-Musical World of a Muslim City]. Zvukovaya sreda sovremennosti: sb. st. pamyati M. E. Tarakanova [The Sound Environment of the Modern Age. A Collection of Articles in Memory of M. E. Tarakanov]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 340–358.
5. Likhachev D. S. Obraz goroda [The Image of the City]. Russkoye iskusstvo ot drevnosti do avangarda [Russian Art from Ancient Times to the Avant-garde]. Moscow, 1992, pp. 331–359.
6. Likhachev D. S. Ekologiya kul'tury [The Ecology of Culture]. Zametki o russkom [The Notes about Russian Features.]. Moscow, 2014, pp. 88–103.
7. Likhachev D. S. Ekologiya kul'tury [The Ecology of Culture]. Russkaya kul'tura [Russian Culture]. St. Petersburg, 2000, pp. 91–101.
8. Simvolizm: yazyk simvolov – yazyk vechnosti. Kolokola – garmonizatory prostranstva [Symbolism: the Language of Symbols is the Language of Eternity. Bells are Harmonizers of Space]. URL: http://www.symbolizm.ru/index.php/simvolizm-zvuka/236-bellharmony. (13.05.2016).
9. Tarakanov M. E. Muzykal'noye prostranstvo i zvukovaya sreda obitaniya [Musical Space and the Sound Environment]. Zvukovaya sreda sovremennosti: sb. st. pamyati M. E. Tarakanova [The Sound Environment of the Modern Age. A Collection of Articles in Memory of M. E. Tarakanov]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 32–37.
10. Allen A. Ecomusicology: Ecocriticism and Musicology. Journal of the American Musicological Society. 2011. Volume 64 (2), pp. 391–394.
11. Clover C. Listening in the City. Antennae. The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture. 2013. Volume 27, pp. 19–30.
12. Farina A. Soundscape ecology: Principles, patterns, Methods and Applications. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer, 2014. 315 p.
13. Krims A. Music and Urban Geography. New York: Routledge, 2007. 248 p.
14. Magen A. Australian Forum of Acoustic Ecology Soundscape. The Journal of Acoustic Ecology. 2009. No. 9 (1), p. 2.
15. Schafer R. The Tuning of the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977. 301 p.