About the Typology of the National Schools of Piano Playing of the Eastern Asian Region (China, Korea, Japan)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
varrious separate countries of the Eastern Asian region. However,
the features of their typological commonness have not been
studied to a suficient degree. The article discloses the essential
features of the schools of piano playing of China, Korea and Japan.
They are examined as a phenomenon that has emerged as a result
of the expedited development of the pianistic culture beyond the
boundaries of the European cultural and historical milieu. It is
suggested to identify this phenomenon as “young national schools
of piano playing in Eastern Asia.” Their typological distinctions
from pianistic schools of the traditional Western type are marked
out: contacts with Western national schools in the systemic
frameworks of communication of “teacher – student,” as well
as the highest stages of development; reliance on the national
repertoire (less intensive); a system-generating meaning of
communication of “performer – follower” (substantial). Relying
on the criteria formulated in the article, the author shows that by
the present time the “young national schools of piano playing” of
Eastern Asia have entered the stage of maturity.
Keywords: piano performance of China, piano performance
of Korea, piano performance of Japan, national schools of piano
playing, art of piano playing of the Eastern Asian region
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Eisenstadt S. A. Stilevye iskaniya v fortepiannom ispolnitel’stve stran Dal’nevostochnogo regiona [Stylistic Quests in Piano Performance in Countries of the Eastern Asian Region] Problemy muzykal’noi nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2011, No. 2, pp. 184–188.
3. Borodin B. B. Otechestvennaya fortepianno-ispolnitel’skaya shkola: k probleme identichnosti [The Russian School of Piano Performance: Concerning the Problem of Identity]. Iskusstvovedenie v kontekste drugikh nauk v Rossii i za rubezhom. Paralleli i vzaimodeystviya [Art Criticism in the Context of Other Disciplines in Russia and in Other Countries. Parallels and Interactions]. Moscow; Edinburgh, 2014, pр. 63–73.
4. Drozhzhina M. N. Molodye natsional’nye kompozitorskie shkoly Vostoka kak yavlenie muzykal’nogo iskusstva XX veka: dis. … d-ra iskusstvovedeniya [Young National Composition Schools of the East as a Phenomenon of the Art of Music in the 20th Century: Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Arts]. Novosibirsk, 2005. 346 p.
5. Kandinskiy-Rybnikov A. A. Epokha romanticheskogo pianizma i sovremennoe ispolnitel’skoe iskusstvo [The Era of Romantic Pianism and the Contemporary Art of Performance]. Muzykal’noe ispolnitel’stvo i pedagogika. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Musical Performance and Pedagogy. History and the Present Day]. Moscow, 1991, pp. 189–213.
6. Nyu Yatsan’. Fortepiannaya pedagogika Rossii i Kitaya: integrativnyy podkhod: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Piano Pedagogy of Russia and China: An Integrative Approach: Dissertation for the Degree of Pedagogical Disciplines]. Moscow, 2009. 197 p.
7. Syuy Bo. Fenomen fortepiannogo ispolnitel’stva v Kitae na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya [The Phenomenon of Piano Performance in China at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries: Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Rostov-na-Donu, 2011. 149 p.
8. Uchitel’ [Teacher]. Bol’shoy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Edited by S. Kuznetsov. St. Petersburg: Norint, 2000, pp. 1411.
9. Huntington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy [The Clash of Civilizations]. Translated by T. Velimeyev, Y. Novikov. Moscow: АСТ, 2003. 576 с.
10. Yaroshevsky M. G. Logika razvitiya nauki i nauchnaya shkola [The Logic of Development of Scholarship and Academic School]. Shkoly v nauke [Schools in Scholarship]. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp. 7–96.
11. Official Site of Hai-Kuong Suh. URL: http://www. haikyungsuh.com.
12. Official Site of Kun Woo Paik. URL: http://www. kunwoopaik.com.
13. Official Site of Lang Lang. URL: http://langlang.com.
14. Official Site of Nakamura Hiroko. URL: http:// nakamurahiroko.com.
15. Official Site of Takahiro Sonoda. URL: http://www. takahiro-sonoda.com.
16. Official Site of Yin Chengzong. URL: http:// www. yinchengzong.com.
17. Pianiseuteu Kun Woo Paik. (In Korean) [Pianist Kun Woo Paik] URL: http://www.koreamonitor.net/print_ it.cfm?upccode=BG66FB1FA7-7.