The “Dispersed Theme”: the Paths of Russian Musical Scholarship in the Mirror Reflection of the History of One Concept
Main Article Content
Abstract
the development of Russian musical scholarship. The demand for it
appeared in the 1960s and 1970s in connection with analysis of new
music and ancient folklore. The concept was irst introduced by A.
G. Yusin (1971). The theoretical base of the renewed concept was
elaborated on by V. P. Bobrovsky. The functional approach made
it possible to expand a set of music theory concepts, including that
of the musical theme. In 20th century music the functions of the
musical theme may be carried out not only by integral constructions,
but also by other type of structures. The dispersed theme, according
to Bobrovsky, presents a chain of motives (phrases) atomized in
musical space, which bear separate attributes of the musical image.
Relections of scholars about new forms of thematicism
exposed two most crucial problems: the necessity of creating
“musical universals” and the possibility of using old terms for
their identiication. Musical universals presumed the development
of a single terminological apparatus for analyzing various musical
specimens in terms of their historical and ethnical origins (Jay
Rahn, V. V. Medushevsky). The question of expediency of use
of the old terminological apparatus for ixation of such universal
concepts has been decided in various ways. New terms have been
suggested for new structures carrying out thematic functions (for
instance E. I, Chigareva’s “generating intonation”). The article also
examines the correlation of the concepts of “disperse theme” and
“micro-theme.”
Keywords: musical theme, dispersed theme, function and
structure in music, micro-theme
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Barsova I. A. Simfonii Gustava Malera [The Symphonies of Gustav Mahler]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo im. N. I. Novikova, 2010. 584 p.
3. Bobrovsky V. P. O peremennosti funktsiy musykal’noy formy [On the Variability of the Functions of Musical Form]. Moscow: Muzyka Press, 1970. 228 p.
4. Bobrovsky V. P. Funktsional’nye osnovy muzykal’noy formy [The Functional Foundations of Musical Form]. Moscow: Muzyka Press, 1978. 332 p.
5. Val’kova V. B. K voprosu o ponyatii “muzykal’naya tema” [Concerning the Concept of the Musical Theme]. Muzykal’noe iskusstvo i nauka [The Art of Music and Scholarship]. Issue 3. Moscow, 1978, pp. 168–190.
6. Val’kova V. B. Muzykal’nyy tematizm – myshleniye – kul’tura [Musical Thematicism – Thought – Culture]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University Press, 1992. 163 p.
7. Val’kova V. B. Tema muzykal’naya [The Musical Theme]. Muzylal’naya entsiklopediya: v 6 t. [The Encyclopedia of Music in 6 Volumes]. Vol. 5. Moscow, 1881, col. 487–488.
8. Grinchenko I. V. Zhanr khorovoy miniatyury v russkoy musyke rubezha XIX–XX vekov (na primere 12 khorov a cappella op. 27 S. Taneeva) [The Genre of the Small Choral Piece in Russian Music at the Turn of the 20th Century (on the Example of Twelve A Cappella Choruses орus 27 by Sergei Taneyev)]. Yuzhno-Rossiyskiy musykal’nyy al’manakh [South Russian Musical Almanac]. 2013, No. 1 (12), pp. 18–26.
9. Denisov A. V. Tematizm i razvitiye v faznoy forme proizvedeniy B. Tishchenko [Thematicism and Development in the Phased Form of Boris Tishchenko’s Compositions]. Musicus, 2012, No. 3. St. Petersburg, 2012, pp. 13–25.
10. Kokoreva L. M. Neozhidannye paralleli: Debyussi – Schenberg, Berg, Webern [Unexpected Parallels: Debussy – Schoenberg, Berg, Webern]. Musikal’naya Akademiya [Musical Academy]. 2014, No. 3, pp. 124–134.
11. Lyakhovich A. V. Simvolika v proizvedeniyakh pozdnego perioda tvorchestva S. Rakhmaninova [Symbolism in the Musical Compositions of Rachmaninoff’s Late Period]. Tambov: Izd-vo R.V. Pershina, 2013. 184 p.
12. Medushevsky V. V. O musykal’nykh universaliyakh [Concerning Musical Universaliae]. S. S. Skrebkov. Stat’i i vospominaniya [S. S. Skrebkov. Articles and Memoirs]. Moscow: Sovetskiy Kompositor, 1979, pp. 176– 212.
13. Ruchyevskaya E. А. O sootnoshenii slova i melodii v russkoy kamerno-vokal’noy muzyke nachala XX veka [On the Correlation between the Text and Melody in the Chamber-Vocal Music of the Early 20th Century]. Russkaya muzyka na rubezhe XX veka: stat’i, soobshcheniya, publikatsii [Russian Music at the Dawn on the 20th Century: Articles, Memoranda, Publications]. Leningrad; Moscow, 1966, pp. 65–110.
14. Ruchyevskaya E. А. Funktsii muzykal’noy temy [The Functions of the Musical Theme]. Leningrad: Muzyka Press, 1977. 160 p.
15. Savina B. V. Nekotorye aspekty vzaimodeystviya induizma i indiyskoy ragi [Some Aspects of Interrelation between Hinduism and the Indian Raga]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvenno pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena [News of Russian State A.I. Herzen University of Pedagogy]. Issue 90. St. Petersburg, 2009, pp. 65–73.
16. Skaftymova L. A. O melodike Rakhmaninova [On Rachmaninoff’s Melodicism]. Stranitsi istorii russkoy muzyki: stat’i molodykh muzykovedov [Pages from the History of Russian Music: Articles by Young Musicologists]. Leningrad, 1973, pp. 103–122.
17. Frolov S. V. Intermezzo I. K istokam odnogo termina v Rakhmaninovedenii [Towards the Sources of one Term in Rachmaninoff Studies]. Frolov S. V. S. V. Rakhmaninov: muzykal’no-istoricheskiy etyudy: sb. st. [Musical-Historical Sketches: Collection of Articles]. Tambov: Izd-vo R. V. Pershina, 2014, pp. 26–30.
18. Kholopova V. N. Formy muzykal’nykh proizvedeniy: ucheb. posobie [Forms of Musical Compositions. Manual]. 2nd Edition, Revised and Enlarged. St. Petersburg: Lan’, 2001. 496 p.
19. Chigareva E. I. Individualiziruyushchiy kompleks temoobrazuyushchikh vyrazitelnykh sredstv v usloviyakh sovremennogo muzykal’nogo yazyka i yego klassicheskie istoki [The Individualizing Complex of Theme-Generating Means of Expression in the Conditions of the Modern Musical Language and its Classical Sources]. Voprosy muzykal’noy nauki [Issues of Music Scholarship]. Issue 4. Moscow, 1979, pp. 70–108.
20. Yusfin A. G. Osobennosti formoobrazovaniya v nekotorykh vidakh narodnoy muzyki [The Particularities of Form in Certain Types of Folk Music]. Voprosy teorii muzykal’nykh form i zhanrov [Issues of the Theory of Musical Forms and Genres]. Moscow, 1971, pp. 134–161.
21. Rahn J. A Theory for All Music: Problems and Solutions in the Analysis of Non-Western Form. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983. 267 p.
22. Reti R. The Thematic Process in Music. London: Faber and Faber, 1961. 362 p.