Music of Victory Celebrating Holidays from the 13th to the 19th Centuries
Main Article Content
Abstract
In musical scholarship in Russia and in other countries the actuality remains for the tendency of
reconsideration of the most significant phenomena of history in light of “reevaluation of the past”
and “substantiating the course of the future.” There is a prevalence of a critical attitude towards
of official holidays as an instrument of state policy directed at correcting the worldview-related
perceptions of the people in the directions, presuming a severance of connections with the preceding
tradition. The most important state holidays, the development of which has not been severed for
over three-hundred years, are victory holidays. Research of holidays celebrating victories in the
historical dynamics has shown a three-stage sequence of the processes of formation, transformation
and revival. The structure of the victory holiday is formed out of stable (church and military rituals
and ceremonials) and mobile elements (mass entertainments and sights). Music, as an inseparable
component of all parts of any holiday, forms a carcass which supports the multidimensionality of the
spatial/temporal continuum of ritualistic and playing forms of activity. It participates in the creation
of the conceptual sphere of a holiday and forms the indispensable conditions for transmission of
cultural values.
Keywords: the art of music, holiday celebrating a victory, official festivity, dynamics of Russian
culture.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Zadonshchina [Zadonshchina]. Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi [Library of Literature of Ancient Russia]. URL: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=4980 (15.07.2019).
3. Rol'f M. Sovetskie massovye prazdniki [Soviet Mass Holidays]. Translation from the German by V. T. Altukhov. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia [ROSSPEN]: Fund of the First President of Russia Boris N. Yeltsin. 2009. 439 p.
4. Slovo o polku Igoreve [The Song of Igor’s Campaign]. Edition of the Ancient Russian text and the Translation by S. Shambinago and V. Rzhiga; S. Shervinsky and Georgy Shtorm’s translations; Introductory article and Commentaries by V. Rzhiga and S. Shambinago; Edition and introductory Article by B. Nevsky. Moscow; Leningrad: Academia, 1934. 295 p. (Russian Literature; Monuments of Ancient Russian Literature).
5. Hayes N., Hill J. Millions Like Us? British Culture in the Second World War Hardcover. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1999. 240 p.
6. Hughes C. B. The Origin of the First Russian Patriotic Oratorio: Stepan Anikievich Degtiarev’s Minin i Pozharskii (1811). Ph.D. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1984. 520 p.
7. Military Music and Tradition in Imperial Russia. Brandenburg Historica’s Online Store: on August 24, LLC. 2014. URL: http://stores.militaryhistoryshop.com/blog/military-music-and-tradition-inimperial-russia/ (15.07.2019).
8. Ostrowski D. «Moscow the Third Rome» as Historical Ghost. Byzantium: Faith and Power (1261–1557). Perspectives on Late Byzantine Art and Culture. Edited by Sarah T. Brooks. (The Metropolitan Museum of Art Symposia). New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006, pp. 170–179.
9. Ritzareva M. Eighteenth-century Russian Music. Aldershot; Burlington: Ashgate, 2006. 387 p.