The Semantics of Musical Dialogue in the Pieces from the "Notebook for Anna Magdalena Bach"
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the article is to describe the semantic situation of musical dialogue to be found in the musical text of the pieces from the "Anna Magdalena’s Notebooks." J.-S. Bach’s instructive works are being considered here due to the fact that on one hand there are possibilities, which have been integrated in those simple and comprehensible pieces, not only to gain interpretive skills but also such of a composer, but on the other hand these possibilities are being usually neglected in the very practice of teaching. Considering the music of the notebook to be instructive literature aimed at acquiring skills of free music making opens up new horizons to variatively and creatively comprehend musical text, and hereby to think creatively. Such an approach to education matches the creative principles of music making in the age of Baroque, as the practice of variational recitation of a text was an established characteristic embedded in the tradition.
Keywords: J. S. Bach, musicianship, instructional compositions for the keyboard, pedagogy at the Children’s Music Schools
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Barsova I. A. Ocherki po istorii partiturnoy notatsii (XVI-pervaya polovina XVIII vv.). — M., 1997.
3. Braudo I. Ob izuchenii klavirnykh sochineniy Bakha v muzykal'noy shkole. — L.: Muzyka, 1979.
4. Gofman I. Fortepiannaya igra. Otvety na voprosy o fortepiannoy igre. — M., 2002.
5. Kirichenko P. Intonatsionnaya leksika i artikulyatsiya plasticheskikh i ritoricheskikh figur v klavirnykh sochineniyakh barokko: metodicheskaya razrabotka. — Ufa: RITs UGII, 2002.
6. Kuznetsova N. O variantnom prochtenii i pereintonirovanii starinnogo urteksta // Semantika starinnogo urteksta: sb. st. / otv. red.-sost. L. N. Shaymukhametova; UGII, Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki. — Ufa: RITs UGII, 2002. — S. 37—53.
7. Margulis V. Ob ispolnitel'skikh ukazaniyakh v klavirnoy muzyke I.-S. Bakha // Sov. muzyka. — 1974. — № 8. — S. 68—72.
8. Milka A., Shabalina T. Zanimatel'naya Bakhiana. — SPb.: Kompozitor, 2001. — Vyp.1-2.
9. Ponizovkin Yu. Problemy interpretatsii i redaktirovaniya klavirnykh proizvedeniy I.-S. Bakha // Interpretatsiya klavirnykh sochineniy I.-S. Bakha: sb. nauch. tr. / GMPI im. Gnesinykh. — M., 1990. — Vyp.109. — S. 33—51.
10. Problemy stilya i interpretatsii muzyki barokko: sb. tr. / MGK im. P. I. Chaykovskogo. — M., 2001. — Vyp. 32.
11. Forkel' I. O zhizni, iskusstve i o proizvedeniyakh Bakha / per. s nem. E. Sazonovoy. — M., 1974.
12. Khodzhava R. K probleme intonatsionnogo genezisa v rabote nad muzykal'nym proizvedeniem // Sovremennye tendentsii v organizatsii vysshego muzykal'nogo obrazovaniya: sb. tr. / GMPI im. Gnesinykh. — M., 1987. — Vyp. 93. — S. 86—108.
13. Kholopova V. Muzykal'noe soderzhanie: Zov kul'tury — Nauka — Pedagogika // Muzykal'naya akademiya. — 2001. — № 2. — S. 34—41.
14. Shabalina T. Rukopisi I.-S. Bakha: Klyuchi k taynam tvorchestva. — SPb.: Logos, 1999.
15. Shaymukhametova L., Yusufbaeva G. Instruktivnye sochineniya I.-S. Bakha dlya klavira v praktike obucheniya tvorcheskomu muzitsirovaniyu. — Ufa, 1998.
16. Shaymukhametova L. Semantika muzykal'nogo dialoga v klavirnykh proizvedeniyakh zapadnoevropeyskikh kompozitorov XVII—XVIII vv. // Semantika starinnogo urteksta: sb. st. / UGII, Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki. — Ufa: RITs UGII, 2002. — S. 16—36.
17. Shaymukhametova L. Migriruyushchaya intonatsionnaya formula i semanticheskiy kontekst muzykal'noy temy / Gos. institut iskusstvoznaniya. — M, 1999.
18. Shaymukhametova L. Smyslovye struktury muzykal'nogo teksta kak problema prakticheskoy semantiki // Muzykal'noe soderzhanie: nauka i pedagogika: mater. vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. — M.; Ufa, 2002. — S. 84—101.
19. Bach J.-S. Klavierbüchlein für Anna Magdalena Bach 1725 // Faksimile der Originalhandschrift mit einem Nachwort herausgegeben von Georg von Dadelsen. — Bärenreiter Kassel; Basel; London; New York, 1988.