On Semiotic Aspects of Musical Interpretation
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article proves the necessity of creating the theoretical
foundation of musical interpretation of keyboard
musical text from the standpoint of semiotic analysis of
the original, composer's text. The author presents the
results of research conducted at the Laboratory of Musical
Semantics of the Ufa State Academy lead by Professor,
Doctor of Arts, Ljudmila Shaimukhametova.
Keywords: theory of interpretation, methodology of
semantic analysis, keyboard text, practical semantics
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Aranovskiy M. G. Zametki o tvorchestve // Sovetskaya muzyka. — 1981. — № 9. — C. 16–22.
3. Aranovskiy M. G. Muzykal'nyy tekst: struktura i svoystva. — M., 1998.
4. Aranovskiy M. G. Simfonicheskie iskaniya: issledovatel'skie ocherki. — L., 1979.
5. Asaf'ev B. V. Muzykal'naya forma kak protsess. Kn. 2. Intonatsiya // Asaf'ev B. V. Izbrannye trudy. T. 5. — M., 1957. — S. 163–276.
6. Asfand'yarova A. I. Intonatsionnaya leksika obrazov pastorali v tematizme fortepiannykh sonat Y. Gaydna: issledovanie. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki UGAI, 2007.
7. Baykieva R. M. Smyslovye struktury muzykal'nogo teksta v p'esakh detskogo fortepiannogo repertuara // Problemy muzykal'noj nauki. — 2008. — № 2. — S. 203–209.
8. Barenboym L. A. «Dognat' i peregnat' Bakha?» // Barenboym L. A. Za polveka. Ocherki. Stat'i. Materialy. — L., 1989. — S. 223–228.
9. Bayazitova D. I. Intonatsionnaya leksika v soderzhanii proizvedeniy detskogo fortepiannogo repertuara: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki, 2008.
10. Bayazitova D. I. O semanticheskoy svyazi zagolovka i smyslovykh struktur muzykal'nogo teksta (na primerakh p'es detskogo fortepiannogo repertuara) // Problemy muzykal'noj nauki. — 2008. — № 2. — S. 210–213.
11. Berlyanchik M. M. K probleme raskrytiya khudozhestvenno-obraznoy soderzhatel'nosti muzyki v ispolnitel'stve // Khudozhestvennyy obraz v ispolnitel'skom iskusstve. Voprosy muzykal'nogo ispolnitel'stva i pedagogiki: mezhvuz. sb. st. / red.-sost. A. A. Glazunov. — Magnitogorsk, 2004. — S. 22–36.
12. Voprosy muzykal'nogo soderzhaniya: sb. tr. RAM im. Gnesinykh. — M., 1996. — Vyp. 136.
13. Gordeeva E. V. Muzykal'naya leksikografiya stsen i obrazov muzitsirovaniya v klavirnykh p'esakh «Frantsuzskikh syuit» I.-S. Bakha // Problemy muzykal'noj nauki. — 2008. — № 2. — S. 198–202.
14. Interpretatsiya muzykal'nogo proizvedeniya v kontekste kul'tury: sb. tr. / RAM im. Gnesinykh. — M., 1994. — Vyp. 129.
15. Kazantseva L. P. Avtor v muzykal'nom soderzhanii: monografiya / RAM im. Gnesinykh. — M., 1998.
16. Kazantseva L. P. Muzykal'nyy portret. — M., 1995.
17. Kirichenko P. V. Semanticheskie aspekty raboty ispolnitelya s muzykal'nym tekstom (na primere klavirnykh proizvedeniy XVII— XVIII vv.): dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki, 2002.
18. Kogan G. M. O rabote muzykanta-pedagoga. Osnovnye printsipy // Voprosy muzykal'noy pedagogiki: sb. st. / red.-sost. V. A. Natanson. — M., 1979. — Vyp. 1. — S. 71–85.
19. Korman B. O. Lirika Nekrasova. — Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. — Izhevsk, 1978.
20. Kopchevskiy N. A. «Muzyka zhiva mysl'yu…» // Sovetskaya muzyka. — 1972. — № 10. — S. 94–96.
21. Kuznetsova N. M. Netraditsionnye formy raboty nad polifonicheskimi proizvedeniyami I.-S. Bakha v klasse obshchego fortepiano: metodicheskaya razrabotka. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki UGII, 2001. — (V pomoshch' slushatelyam FPK).
22. Kuznetsova N. M. Tvorcheskoe vzaimodeystvie ispolnitelya s muzykal'nym tekstom (na primere instruktivnykh sochineniy I.-S. Bakha dlya klavira): dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki, 2005.
23. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Kul'tura i vzryv. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Stat'i. Issledovaniya. Zametki (1968—1992). — SPb., 2004.
24. Lotman Yu. M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta // Lotman Yu. M. Ob iskusstve. — SPb., 2005. — S. 13–285.
25. Medushevskiy V. V. Chelovek v zerkale intonatsionnoy formy // Sovetskaya muzyka. — 1980. — № 9. — C. 39–48.
26. Mel'nikova N. I. Fortepiannoe ispolnitel'stvo kak kul'turologicheskiy fenomen: avtoref. dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — Novosibirsk, 2002.
27. Muzykal'noe soderzhanie: nauka i pedagogika: mater. III Vserossiyskoy nauch.-prakt. konf. / otv. red.-sost. L. N. Shaymukhametova. — Ufa, 2005.
28. Muzykal'nyy tekst i ispolnitel': sb. st. / otv. red.-sost. L. N. Shaymukhametova. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki UGAI, 2004.
29. Neygauz G. G. Ob iskusstve fortepiannoy igry. Zapiski pedagoga. — Izd. 4-e. — M.: Muzyka, 1982.
30. Rappoport S. Kh. Priroda iskusstva i spetsifika muzyki // Esteticheskie ocherki. Izbrannoe: sb. st. / sost. I. A. Konstantinov, S. Kh. Rappoport. — M., 1980. — S. 63–102.
31. Savshinskiy S. I. Rabota pianista nad muzykal'nym proizvedeniem. — M., 2004.
32. Semantika starinnogo urteksta: sb. st. / otv. red.-sost. L. N. Shaymukhametova. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki UGII, 2002.
33. Taraeva G. R. Interpretatsiya kak uchebnaya distsiplina v vuze // Sovetskaya muzyka. — 1982. — № 7. — S. 63–68.
34. Teplov B. M. K. N. Igumnov o tvorcheskom puti i ispolnitel'skom iskusstve pianista: iz besed s psikhologami // Psikhologiya i psikhofiziologiya individual'nykh razlichiy. — M.; Voronezh, 2004. — S. 132–214.
35. Kholopova V. N. Muzykal'noe soderzhanie: zov kul'tury — nauka — pedagogika // Muzykal'naya akademiya. — 2001. — № 2. — C. 34 –41.
36. Shaymukhametova L. N. Dialogi-etyudy v rabote ispolnitelya s muzykal'nym tekstom (na primere fortepiannykh proizvedeniy zapadnoevropeyskikh kompozitorov XVII–XVIII vv.). — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki UGII, 2002. — (V pomoshch' slushatelyam FPK).
37. Shaymukhametova L. N., Kirichenko P. V. Intonatsionnye etyudy v klasse fortepiano: ucheb. posobie. — Ufa: Laboratoriya muzykal'noy semantiki UGII, 2002.
38. Shaymukhametova L. N. Migriruyushchaya intonatsionnaya formula i semanticheskiy kontekst muzykal'noy temy: issledovanie. — M., 1999.
39. Shaymukhametova L. N. Migriruyushchaya intonatsiya kak semanticheskaya struktura i ee preobrazovanie v kontekste muzykal'noy temy // Voprosy poetiki i semantiki: sb. tr. / otv. red. L. N. Shaymukhametova. — M., 1998. — Vyp. 144. — S. 53–75.
40. Shaymukhametova L. N. Semanticheskiy analiz muzykal'noy temy. — M., 1998.
41. Shaymukhametova L. N. Smyslovye struktury muzykal'nogo teksta kak problema prakticheskoy semantiki // Muzykal'noe soderzhanie: nauka i pedagogika: mater. I Vserossiyskoy nauch.-prakt. konf. / otv. red.-sost. V. N. Kholopova / MGK im. P. I. Chaykovskogo. — M.; Ufa, 2002. — S. 84–101.
42. Shaymukhametova L. N., Yusufbaeva G. R. Instruktivnye sochineniya I.-S. Bakha dlya klavira v praktike obucheniya tvorcheskomu muzitsirovaniyu. — Ufa, 1998.