The Scheme as an Instrument of Analysis of Musical-Semantic Structures of German Protestant Chorale
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article focuses on protestant chorale, the genre which has become an important channel of communication of religious experience in the period of Reformation. Especially remarkable in this respect is the role of melodies-symbols. The author analyses the chorale «Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir» by Martin Luther as it has been implemented in some works of J. S. Bach. The author uses the schematic depiction of the theme of chorale, as well as of thematicism of the parts in the Art of Fugue, in the prelude and fugue in E flat minor from the WTC/I and explains the principle of unveiling of musical-semantic construction of the hymn, formation of the symbol, and transmission to the musical work its hidden meanings and contexts.
Keywords: Protestant chorale, symbolic of the protestant chorale, J. S. Bach and the protestant chorale, musical symbology
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Арановский М. Г. Музыкальный текст. Структура и свойства. – М.: Композитор, 1998.
3. Бах И. С. Хорошо темперированный клавир [Но ты] / ред. Б. Муджеллини. – М.: Музыка, 1990. – Т. 1.
4. Берченко Р. Э. В поисках утраченного смысла. Болеслав Яворский о «Хорошо темперированном клавире». – М.: Классика – XXI, 2005.
5. Библия. Книги Священного Писания Ветхого и Нового завета. Канонические. Синодальный перевод 1876 г. – М.: Российское библейское общество, 2009.
6. Вертгеймер М. Продуктивное мышление. – М.: Прогресс, 1987.
7. Вязкова Е. «Искусство фуги» И. С. Баха: некоторые выводы из семантического анализа // Семантика музыкального языка: матер. науч. конф. / РАМ им. Гнесиных. – М., 2004. – С. 213–218.
8. Гудмен Н. Способы создания миров. – М.: Идея-пресс – Праксис, 2001.
9. Друскин М. С. Иоганн Себастьян Бах. − М.: Музыка, 1982.
10. Захарова О. И. Риторика и западноевропейская музыка XVII – первой половины ХVIII в. – М.: Музыка, 1983.
11. Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. – М.: СЭ, 1990.
12. Лотман Ю. М. Каноническое искусство как информационный парадокс // Лотман Ю. М. Статьи по семиотике культуры и искусства. – СПб., 2002. – С. 314–321.
13. Медушевский В. В. К анализу художественного мира и выразительных средств музыки Баха // Полифоническая музыка. Вопросы анализа: сб. тр. / ГМПИ им. Гнесиных. – М., I984. – Вып. 75. – C. 83–106. 14. Носина В. Б. Символика музыки И. С. Баха и её интерпретация в «Хорошо темперированном клавире». – М.: ГМПИ им. Гнесиных, 1991.
15. Нотная библиотека классической музыки [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: / http://nlib.narod.ru.
16. Пирс Ч. С. Начала прагматизма / пер. с англ., предисл. В. В. Кирющенко, М. В. Колопотина. – СПб.: Лаборатория Метафизических исследований философского факультета СПбГУ; Алетейя, 2000.
17. Швейцер А. Иоганн Себастьян Бах. – М.: Музыка, 1965.
18. Эскина Н. А. Принцип «комментирования» и хоральная обработка Барокко // Проблемы теории западноевропейской музыки (XII–XVII вв.): сб. тр. ГМПИ им. Гнесиных. – М., 1983. – Вып. 65. – С. 113–132.
19. Яворский Б. Л. Статьи, воспоминания, переписка. T. 1. – М.: Сов. композитор, 1972.
20. Evangelisches Kirchengesangbuch [Music]: Ausgabe für evangelisch-litherischen Kirchen Nidersachsens. Mit Lektions. – Hannover, 1958.