About Motion in the Symphonic Cycle
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
as the most crucial constituent part of the content of genre in each
of the movements of the cycle. The genesis of the symphony’s
kinetic images is conditioned by the Human Being’s manifestation
of emotions, social status and corporeality.
The term “motion” in relation to the genre of the symphony
connotes the special character of the development of the musical
material – the directedness towards change, the transformation of
the initial images during the course of the dramaturgy. Not only
the procedural, but the semantic perspective ind relection here
in such images as “kinetic plasticity,” “grotesque plasticity” and
“abstract plasticity.” When combined together, they become a
part of the ideal-artistic conception of the symphony: Happiness,
Tragedy and Eternity.
Keywords: symphonic cycle, musical genres, musical
content, musical dramaturgy, motion in music
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Balanchine G. Tantseval’nyy element v muzyke Stravinskogo [The Dance Element in the music of Stravinsky]. Stravinskiy: stat’i i materialy [Stravinsky: Articles and Materials]. Moscow, 1985, pp. 261–269.
3. Barsova I. A. Simfonii Gustava Malera [The Symphonies of Gustav Mahler]. Moscow: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1975. 495 p.
4. Druskin M. S. Igor’ Stravinskiy. Lichnost’, tvorchestvo, vzglyady [Igor Stravinsky. Personality, Creativity, Views]. Leningrad: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1982. 208 p.
5. Druskin M. S. Ocherki po istorii tantseval’noy muzyki [Essays on the History of Dance Music]. Leningrad: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1963. 201 p.
6. Zaydel’ E. G. Teoriya otnositel’nosti i muzyka [The Theory of Relativity and Music]. Prostranstvo i vremya v muzyke [Space and Time in Music]. Moscow: Gnessin Russian Academy of Music, 1992. Issue 141, pp. 101–116.
7. Kazantseva L. P. Osnovy teorii muzykal’nogo soderzhaniya: uchebnoe posobie [Fundamentals of the Theory of Music Content: Tutorial Manual]. Astrahan’: Fakel, 2001. 368 p.
8. Kogan L. N. Vechnost’. Prekhodyashchee i neprekhodyashchee v zhizni cheloveka [Eternity. The Evanescent and the Enduring in Human Life]. Ekaterinburg: Ural State M. Gorky University, 1994. 208 p.
9. Kuznetsova M. V. Meditativnost’ kak svoystvo muzykal’nogo myshleniya (Avet Terteryan, Arvo Pyart, Valentin Sil’vestrov): avtoref. dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya [The Contemplative State as a Property of Musical Thinking (Avet Terteryan, Arvo Pärt, Valentin Silvestrov): Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Moscow, 2007. 26 p.
10. Medushevskiy V. V. Intonatsionnaya forma muzyki [The Intonational Form of Music]. Moscow: Kompozitor, 1993. 262 p.
11. Medushevskiy V. V. O zakonomernostyakh i sredstvakh khudozhestvennogo vozdeystviya muzyki [About the Regularities And Means of the Artistic Impact of Music]. Moscow: Muzyka Press, 2010. 254 p.
12. Medushevskiy V. V. Khristianskie osnovaniya sonatnoy formy [The Christian Foundations of the Sonata Form]. Muzykal’naya akademiya. 2005, No. 4, pp. 13–27.
13. Sokolov O. V. Morfologicheskaya sistema muzyki i ee khudozhestvennye zhanry [The Morphological System of Music and its Artistic Genres]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University, 1994. 220 p.
14. Filimonova M. N. Adagio v simfoniyakh Bruknera [The Adagio in Bruckner’s Symphonies]. Voprosy teorii muzyki [Questions of Music Theory]. Moscow, 1975. Issue 3, pp. 273–276.
15. Kholopova V. N. Tri storony muzykal’nogo soderzhaniya [The Three Sides of Musical Content]. Muzykal’noe soderzhanie: nauka i pedagogika: mat-ly I Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Musical Content: Scholarship and Pedagogy: Proceedings of the First Russian Research-Practical Conference]. Ed. V. Kholopova. Moscow; Ufa, 2002, pp. 55–76.
16. Tsukkerman V. A. Muzykal’nye zhanry i osnovy muzykal’nykh form [Musical Genres and the Bases of Musical Forms]. Moscow: Muzyka Press, 1964. 159 p.
17. Shaymukhametova L. N. Migriruyushchaya intonatsionnaya formula i semanticheskiy kontekst muzykal’noy temy [The Migrating Intonational Formula and The Semantic Context of the Musical Theme]. Moscow: State Institute of Art, 1999. 318 p.
18. Shaymukhametova L. N. Semanticheskie protsessy v muzykal’noy teme: avtoref. dis. … d-ra iskusstvovedeniya [Semantic Processes in the Musical Theme: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Arts]. Moscow, 2000. 35 p.
19. Sheyn S. F. Teoriya simfonizma v tolkovanii B. Asaf’eva [The Theory of the Symphony in the Interpretation of Boris Asafiev]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Problems of Musical Science]. Compiled by V. Zak and E. Chigaryova. Moscow: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1985. Issue 6, pp. 4–28.
20. Shmakova O. V. Final v simfonicheskikh tsiklakh Bartoka, Oneggera i Khindemita (1930–1950-e gg.) [The Finale in the Symphonic Cycles of Bartok, Honegger and Hindemith (1930s–1950s)]. Volgograd: Miria, 2009. 238 p.
21. Shmakova O. V. Final v simfonicheskom tsikle [The Finale in the Symphonic Cycle]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2009, No. 1 (4), pp. 121–124.