Concerning the Issue of Interaction between Personality and the Environment in Shostakovich’s Late Instrumental Concertos
Main Article Content
Abstract
An important side in the development of music in Russia starting from the mid-1950s was the artistic research
of the interrelations of the individual with the surrounding environment. The search for concrete individualized
forms of manifestation of this type of problematics attracted composers most frequently to the genre of the
instrumental concerto, where the textural principle of organization of the material provides natural possibilities
for the differentiation of the personal principle and the image of outward reality. The questions of the interaction
of personality with the surrounding environment were of greatest interest to Shostakovich during the course of
one decade (1957–1967). It was particularly at that time that in his music the genre of the instrumental concerto
received specially intensive development. The point of departure in the development of the questions of interaction
of personality and environment was fixated in Shostakovich’s late music in his Second Piano Concerto (1957),
which presents the model of a full contact of the personality with the surrounding environment, which is extremely
rare for his music. Only a few years after that the composer begins modeling the interrelation between the individual
and reality in a totally different manner. An important landmark on this path was his First Cello Concerto (1959),
which reflected the situation of the increasing contrariety of the world perception of a person living on the verge
of the 1950s–1960s in his broken connections with the surrounding world. The most important composition
pertaining to the examined subject matter is the Second Cello Concerto (1966). The general conflict passes here
along the line of confrontation between the categories of high and low, the beautiful and the ugly, the spiritual and
the primitive, the human and the anti-humanistic. During the course of the conjugacy and confrontation of these
notional-semantic strata arises one of Shostakovich’s most complex philosophical conceptions, entirely devoted
to the issue of exposure of all sorts of types of interrelations between the individual and the surrounding world.
following such a critical culmination, the contrariety started to subside quickly, the testimony to which was given
by the Second Violin Concerto (1967), which expresses an overcoming of collisions, which prior to that seemed
to be almost inextricable. This way the outstanding master brought out in his late concertos all the basic models
of possible interrelations between the personality and the environment – from harmony (Second Piano Concerto)
through increasing contrariety (First Cello Concerto) and open conflict (Second Cello Concerto) to an overcoming
of contrariety (Second Violin Concerto).
Keywords: Shostakovich, instrumental concertos by Shostakovich, personality and the surrounding environment
in Shostakovich’s music.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Demchenko A. I. Ob odnom iz smyslovykh rakursov v pozdnem tvorchestve D. Shostakovicha [About one of the Semantic Angles in the Late Works of Shostakovich]. Tvorchestvo D. Shostakovicha v kontekste mirovogo khudozhestvennogo prostranstva: sb. st. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [The Oeuvres of Dmitri Shostakovich in the Context of the Global Artistic Domain: Compilation of Articles of the International Scholarly Conference]. Astrakhan, 2007, pp. 306–322.
3. Izuchaya mir Dmitriya Shostakovicha: sb. st. [Studying the World of Dmitri Shostakovich: a Compilation of Articles]. Ed. G. P. Ovsyankina. St. Petersburg: Soyuz khudozhnikov, 2011. 240 p.
4. Ostrovskaya G. I. Poslednie kvartety D. Shostakovicha [The Last Quartets of Shostakovich]. Muzyka v sovremennom mire: nauka, pedagogika, ispolnitel’stvo [Music in the Modern World: Science, Pedagogy, Performance]. Ed. I. N. Vanovskaya. Tambov, 2013, pp. 104–118.
5. Shchedrin R. K. D. Shostakovich – glazami sovremennikov [Dmitry Shostakovich – Through the Eyes of his Contemporaries]. Muzykal’naya zhizn’ [Musical Life]. 1981, No. 17, p. 1.
6. Fay L. E. Shostakovich: A Life. Oxford University Press, 2000. 492 p.
7. Matthew-Walker R. Shostakovich’s Sixteenth Symphony. Musical Opinion. Volume 129. No. 1451. March/April 2006, рр. 118–138.
8. Norris C. Music and the Politics of Culture. Lawrence & Wishart, 1989. 364 p.
9. Steinberg M. The Symphony: A Listener’s Guide. Oxford University Press, 1998. 678 p.
10. Wilson E. Interpreting Shostakovich’s Eclectic Second Cello Concerto. Miranda Strings. Volume 26. No. 5, December 2011, рр. 73–92.