The Determinants of the Value Orientation of Personality in the Communicative Space of the Art of Music
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The contemporary social and cultural situation, equipped with significant achievements in the sphere of highly
developed technologies and cultural values, provides human beings with great opportunities for a full-fledged
harmonious existence. However, this social well-being presents merely the outer shell, under which lies hidden the
deep spiritual crisis of human society. This is connected, first of all, with the overall immersion into the intellectual
sphere of activity and people’s rejection of their intuitive inner element, which results in a loss of oneself. In
such conditions the human being becomes passive and closed, losing interest and the abilities for perception of
musical compositions. Nonetheless, it is the art of music which presents a means for disclosing the human being’s
spiritual potential which elevates him or her above the world of practical aims. The outer determinants are the
main references for motivation in the acquisition of aesthetical experience. For carrying out research this issue the
author suggests making use of the communicative-axiological approach adapted by her to this issue. This makes
it possible to determine the human being’s value landmarks in his or her creative communicative activities, which
are formed as the result of development of certain skills in a person. The article presents characterizations of four
types of personality which have various correlation of development of the intellectual and intuitive principles:
personality with a strong manifestation of intuition and a corresponding development of intellect; personality with a
strong manifestation of intuition and an insufficient development of intellect; personality with a strongly developed
intellect, but with a “run-down,” closed intuition; personality with undeveloped intellect and closed intuition. The
present research in light of the formation of a new anthropology of the New Worldview opens up broad possibilities
for improvement of interaction between participants of the communicative system of “art vs. society.”
Keywords: art, communicative-axiological approach, value landmarks, development of personality, communication,
axiology.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Vygotsky L. S. Psikhologiya iskusstva [The Psychology of Art]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, 2016. 448 p.
3. Kireyeva N. Yu. Teatralizovannye formy realizatsii muzykal’nogo materiala: kommunikativnye aspekty [The Theatricalized Forms of Realization of Musical Material: Aspects of Communication]. Problemy muzykal’noj nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2014, No. 4 (17), pp. 122–127.
4. Kremlyov Yu. A. O meste muzyki sredi iskusstv [About the Place of Music among the Arts]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1966. 64 p.
5. Monro R. Okonchatel’noe puteshestvie [Monroe R. The Ultimate Journey]. Moscow: Sofiya, 2010, 320 p.
6. Reybruk M. Muzyka kak opyt: protsessual’nyy i ekologicheskiy podkhody [Reybrouck M. Music as Experience: Procedural and Ecological Approaches]. Problemy muzykal’noj nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2011. № 1, pp. 164–175.
7. Smirnov B. F. K probleme tipologii slushateley simfonicheskikh kontsertov [Towards the Issue of Typology of Listeners of Symphonic Concerts]. SOTsIS (Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya) [Sociological Research (Socis)]. 2004, No. 10, pp. 86–89.
8. Sokhor A. N. Kompozitor i publika v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [The Composer and the Audience in Socialist Society]. Muzyka v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve: sb. st. [Music in Socialist Society: Digest of Articles]. Compiled by A.A. Farbshteyn. Issue 2. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1975, pp. 5–20.
9. Sharkovskaya N. V. Formirovanie sotsial’no-kul’turnoy aktivnosti lichnosti v uchrezhdeniyakh kul’tury i obrazovaniya: strukturno-funktsional’nyy podkhod: avtoref. dis. … d-ra ped. nauk [The Formation of Social and Cultural Activity of a Personality in Institutions of Culture and Education: The Structural-Functional Approach: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Education]. Moscow, 2009. 48 p.
10. Yakupov A. N. Teoreticheskie problemy muzykal’noy kommunikatsii [Theoretical Issues of Musical Communication]. Moscow: Moscow State Conservatory; Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorsk State Musical Pedagogical Institute, 1994. 288 p.
11. Brindle R. S. The New Music: The Avant-garde since 1945. Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987. 234 p.
12. Lewin D. Musical Form and Transformation: Four Analytic Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. 168 p.
13. Marschall B., Schulte C., Vorwalder S., Wagner F. (Hg.) (K)ein Ende der Kunst: Kritische Theorie, Ästhetik, Gesellschaft (Kritische Kulturstudien) [(No) End of Art: Critical Theory, Aesthetics, and Society (Critical Cultural Studies)]. Berlin u.a.: LIT, 2014. 256 p.
14. Palme P. Ware werden und werdende Ware. Cyborgs und Akkumulation [Goods and More Goods. Cyborgs and Accumulation]. SYN künstlich. Ambivalenzen des Artefakts [SYN Art. Ambivalences of Artifacts]. 2015, No. 11, pp. 25–34.
15. Straberger M. Kunst und Kultur ist uns im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes heilig [The Arts and Culture to Us Are Sacred in the Truest Sense of Words]. SYN obszön. Variationen des Erregenden [SYN Obscene. Variations of the Excitatory]. 2014, No. 09, pp. 47–57.