Musical Computer Technologies as an Instrument of Transmission and Preservation of Musical Folklore (by the Example of the Russian Far East)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article analyzes the issues of gathering and arrangement of folk musical materials, examines contemporary
informational resources and technologies as a means of preservation and transmission of musical folklore.
The Far East is a unique ethnic region inhabited by bearers of various cultures on its region, however, traditional
folk music is rapidly disappearing, as the bearers of these languages are gradually dying out. Musical computer
technologies (MCT) may become a perspective tool for mastery, transmission and preservation of phenomena of
musical culture, in connection with which there arises the necessity of the swiftest implementation of MCT into the
practice of activities of folk music researchers.
Disclosure of unique specimens of traditional musical creativity, the study and comprehension of the most valuable
collected materials, and the work on deciphering – all of these have not lost their relevance. The authors emphasize
the important role of further professional elaboration, cataloguing, classification, systematization and digitization of
data. The article gives support to the idea of a “musical bank” and an “intonational catalogue” of examples of musical
folklore. Accentuation is given to the issue of creation of an education-related space in the domain of the Internet
with application of the opportunities for MCT, which demonstrate themselves, among other things, as a new means
of accumulation and transmission of knowledge about music. The authors come to the conclusion about the ability of
MCT to play a significant role in the process of mastery, transmission and preservation of the musical culture of the
Russian Far East, as well as the development and popularization of the traditional cultural heritage of the multinational
state of Russia.
Keywords: musical computer technologies, traditional musical culture, musical culture of the Far East of Russia,
intercultural communication, transmission of musical culture.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Alieva I. G., Gorbunova I. B. O proekte sozdaniya intellektual'noy sistemy po katalogizatsii i analizu muzyki narodov mira [Concerning the Project of Creating an Intelligent System of Cataloguing and Analysis of Music of the Peoples of the World]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture]. 2016. No. 9, pp. 105–108.
3. Gorbunova I. B. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v muzyke. T. 3: Muzykal'nyy komp'yuter: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy [Informational Technology in Music. Vol. 3: The Musical Computer: A Textbook for Students of Institutions of Higher Education]. St. Petersburg: Publ. House of the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 2011. 411 p.
4. Gorbunova I. B. Komp'yuternaya studiya zvukozapisi kak instrument muzykal'nogo tvorchestva i fenomen muzykal'noy kul'tury [Computer Recording Studio as an Instrument of Musical Creativity and the Phenomenon of Musical Culture]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture]. 2017. No. 2, pp. 87–92.
5. Gorbunova I. B. Muzykal'no-komp'yuternye tekhnologii i DIGITAL HUMANITIES [Music Computer Technologies and DIGITAL HUMANITIES]. Sovremennoe muzykal'noe obrazovanie – 2015: materialy XIV mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Contemporary Musical Education – 2015: Proceedings of the 14th International Scholarly and Practical Conference]. Ed. by I. B. Gorbunova. St. Petersburg, 2015, pp. 29–34.
6. Zemtsovskiy I. I. Apologiya «muzykal'nogo veshchestva» [The Apology of “Musical Substance”]. Muzykal'naya akademiya [Musical Academy]. 2005. No. 2, pp. 181–192.
7. Mezentseva S. V. Teoriya muzyki: elektronnoe uchebnoe posobie dlya inostrannykh studentov [Theory of Music: Electronic Textbook for Foreign Students]. Khabarovsk, 2016. URL: https://sites.google.com/site/muzykalnaateoria/.
8. Tarakanov M. E. Zvukovaya sreda sovremennosti [The Sound Environment of Contemporaneity]. Iz lichnykh arkhivov professorov Moskovskoy konservatorii: nauch. tr. Moskovskoy gos. konservatorii [From the Personal Archives of Professors of the Moscow Conservatory: Research Works of the Moscow State Conservatory]. Issue 42. Moscow, 2002, pp. 158–169.
9. Aliyeva I. Azerbaijani Modes: Their Evolution and Manifestation in Traditional and European Genres (Cognitive Approach). Eighth European Music Analysis Conference. Leuven, Belgium. Sept. 17–20, 2014, pp. 5–6.
10. Bhatara A., Boll-Avetisyan N., Agus T., Höhle B., Nazzi T. Language experience affects grouping of musical instrument sounds. Cognitive Science. 2015. No. 40 (7), pp. 1816–1830. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12300.
11. Gorbunova I. New Tool for a Musician. 15th International Conference on Education, Economics, Humanities and Interdisciplinary Studies (EEHIS-2018), Paris (France), June 20–21. Paris, 2018, pp. 144–150.
12. Hoffer C. R., Bailey D. Western Music Listening Today. 4th Edn. Boston, MA: Schirmer Cengage Learning, 2016. 448 p.
13. Langmeyer A., Guglhör-Rudan A., Tarna C. What do Music Preferences Reveal About Personality? A Cross- Cultural Replication Using Self-Ratings and Ratings of Music Samples. J. Individ. Diff. 33, 2012, pp. 119–130.
14. Quinto L., Thompson W. F., Taylor A. The Contributions of Compositional Structure and Performance Expression to the Communication of Emotion in Music. Psychol. Music. 2014. No. 42, pp. 503–524.
15. Thorpe M., Ockelford A., Aksentrijevic A. An Empirical Exploration of the Zygonic Model of Expectation in Music. Psychol. Music. 2012. No. 40, pp. 428–470.