Piotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and the Russian Musical Society. A Sociocultural Aspect of Interaction
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the multifaceted relations between Piotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and the Russian Musical
Society (RMS) in the aspect of their interaction and mutual influence. This relationship began during the period of
Tchaikovsky’s studies at the Musical Classes affiliated with the RMS, and then at the St. Petersburg Conservatory,
which presented a structural component of the RMS. It was particularly to the directorate of the RMS that in 1862
Tchaikovsky wrote his request about his enrollment at the Conservatory, and particularly the concerts organized by the
RMS shaped the foundation of his compositional talent. Having become a professor of music theory at the Moscow
Conservatory, Tchaikovsky entered into titular relations with the RMS as the superior organization: he signed official
contracts, presented himself for rewards, and received material assistant. As a music critic Tchaikovsky illuminated the
Society’s activities in the press for almost ten years. The creative path of Tchaikovsky the composer is connected in
the closest manner with the RMS: he received commissions from the Society to write compositions; various regional
sections of the Society (primarily, the Moscow and St. Petersburg Sections) presented concert venues to him; many
premieres of Tchaikovsky’s works took place at the orchestral and chamber assemblies of the RMS.
The rise in the number of concerts of the RMS with Tchaikovsky’s music towards the second half of the 1880s, and
then the loss of this precedence indicates at the tendency of the decrease of the prestige of the RMS and the increase of
the authority of other concert organizations in the early 1890s. An aspiration to halt the decline in the RMS was what in
many ways stipulated Tchaikovsky’s activities as the director of the Moscow Section of the RMS, his work on inviting
outstanding musicians for participation in the Society’s concerts, as well as the activities of Tchaikovsky the conductor
during the period of his directorship. No less significant from the historical perspective the endeavors of Tchaikovsky
the director were connected with his aspiration to uphold the high tradition of the Moscow Conservatory, in light of
which we may view his initiatives of confirming Sergei Taneyev on the post of the director of the conservatory and
inviting Vassily Safonov. In this manner the article traces the mutual advantage of Tchaikovsky’s interactions with the
RMS on a historical-cultural scale.
Keywords: Piotr I. Tchaikovsky, the Russian Musical Society, the first conservatories in Russia, concert life in
Russia of the 2nd half of the 19th century, performances of Tchaikovsky’s music during his lifetime.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Dni i gody P. I. Chaykovskogo: letopis' zhizni i tvorchestva [P. I. Tchaikovsky’s Days and Years: A Chronicle of Life and Creativity]. Comp. by E. Zaydenshnur, V. Kiselev, A. Orlova, N. Shemanin. Moscow; Leningrad: Muzgiz, 1940. 743 p.
3. Kaleys A. S. Arkhiv Russkogo muzykal'nogo obshchestva [The Archive of the Russian Musical Society]. Teatr i muzyka: dokumenty i materialy [Theater and Music: Documents and Materials]. Moscow; Leningrad, 1963, pp. 24–56.
4. Komarov A. V. Ariya «O del mio dolce ardor» iz opery K. V. Glyuka «Paris i Elena»: sud'ba sochineniya v XIX veke, instrumentovka P. I. Chaykovskogo [Aria “O del mio dolce ardor” from K. V. Gluck’s opera “Paride ad Elena”: the Fate of the Work in the 19th Century, the Instrumentation of P. I. Tchaikovsky]. Nasledie: XVIII–XIX veka: sbornik statey, materialov i dokumentov [Heritage: 18th and 19th Century: A Collection of Articles, Materials and Documents]. Issue 2. Moscow, 2013, pp. 296–314.
5. Larosh G. A. Izbrannye stat'i. V 5 vyp. Vyp. 2: P. I. Chaykovskiy [Selected Articles. In 5 Issues. Issue 2: P. I. Tchaikovsky]. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1975. 368 p.
6. Letopis' zhizni i tvorchestva V. I. Safonova [Chronicle of Life and Creativity of V. I. Safonov]. Comp. by L. L. Tumarinson, B. M. Rosenfeld. Moscow: Belyy bereg, 2009. 768 p.
7. Moiseev G. A. Kamernye ansambli P. I. Chaykovskogo [The Chamber Ensembles of P. I. Tchaikovsky]. Moscow: Muzyka, 2009. 296 p.
8. Tematiko-bibliograficheskiy ukazatel' sochineniy P. I. Chaykovskogo [Thematic and Bibliographical Index of the Works by P. I. Tchaikovsky]. Ed. and comp. by P. Vaydman, L. Korabel'nikova, V. Rubtsova. Moscow: P. Yurgenson, 2006. 1194 p.
9. Chaykovskiy i zarubezhnye muzykanty. Izbrannye pis'ma inostrannykh korrespondentov [Tchaikovsky and Musicians from Other Countries. Selected Letters of Correspondents from Other Countries]. Comp. by N. A. Alekseev. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1970. 240 p.
10. Chaykovskiy i Taneev. Pis'ma [Tchaikovsky and Taneyev. Letters]. Ed. and comp. by V. A. Zhdanov. Moscow: Goskul'tprosvetizdat, 1951. [XI], 557 p.
11. Chaykovskiy P. I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. II–XVII: Literaturnye proizvedeniya i perepiska [Compilation of Complete Works. Vol. II–XVII: Literary Works and Correspondence]. Moscow: Muzgiz – Muzyka, 1953–1981.
12. Chaykovskiy P. I., Yurgenson P. I. Perepiska. V 2 t. T. 2: 1886–1893 [Correspondence. In 2 Vol. Vol. 2: 1886– 1893]. Ed. and comp. by P. Vaydman. Moscow: P. Yurgenson, 2013. 664 p.
13. Epizody zhizni P. I. Chaykovskogo v dokumentakh. Publikatsiya A. G. Aynbinder [Episodes from P. I. Tchaikovsky’s Life in Documents. Publication of A. G. Ainbinder]. Neizvestnyy Chaykovskiy [The Unknown Tchaikovsky]. Scientific ed. and comp. by P. E. Vaydman. Moscow: P. Yurgenson, 2009, pp. 301–344.
14. Polotskaya Elena E. Concerning the History of Education of Music Theorists and Composers in the First Russian Conservatories. // Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2017. No. 4, pp. 100–107. DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2017.4.100-107.
15. Sundkvist L. Ein bisher unbekannter Brief Čajkovskijs, Paris, 18 März 1888, an Louis Diémer. Tschaikowsky- Gesellschaft. 2013. Mitteilungen 20. S. 156–167.