Pastoral Images in Debussy’s and Ravel’s Children’s Ballets
Main Article Content
Abstract
The French ballet theater of the first decades of the 20th century witnessed the unusual actualization of pastoral
subject matter. It was not uncommon for the pastoral ideal in musical theater to be revived in connection with the
image of childhood. The tangency of the subject matter of the pastoral with that of childhood in art is hardly a new
phenomenon in art. The cult of simplicity and naïveté forms comprises one of the foundations of the pastoral worldview.
A particular manifestation of pastoral images in the music of the early 20th century has been demonstrated by theater
compositions for a children’s auditorium – Claude Debussy’s ballet “La boite a joujoux” (1913) and Maurice Ravel’s
“L’Enfant et les sortileges” (1925), where the pastoral model is present on the level of the plots. The pastoral images of
Debussy’s and Ravel’s ballets acquire a polysemic, diversified meaning. Thus, the pastoral scene from Debussy’s “La
boite a joujoux” presents a witty play with tradition and theatrical clichés and, along with this, the reflection of a new
picture of the world in pre-war Europe projected by the artist onto the world of children’s consciousness. The pastoral
scene of lyrical fantasy in Ravel’s “L’enfant et les sortileges” presents a stylized image of the past (either than of an
individual person or that of all humanity), demonstrating itself as one of the motives of confession of the artist uttered
on behalf of a child. The “children’s” interpretations of the pastoral myth in the French ballet theater are connected with
the general cultural tendencies of the time – a perception of the pastoral as a Golden Age, to the archetype of which the
image of the child also appeals.
Keywords: the art of the early 20th century, Claude Debussy, Maurice Ravel, the pastoral, children’s ballets, French
musical theater.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Debyussi K. A. Stat’i. Retsenzii. Besedy [Debussy C. A. Articles. Reviews. Interviews]. Translation and Comments by A. Bushen; Edited and with an Introductory Article by Yu. Kremlev. Moscow; Leningrad: Muzyka, 1964. 280 p.
3. Yermakov A. A. Zhanrovye osobennosti detskoy opery dlya lyubitel’skogo teatra: na primere tvorchestva ural’skikh kompozitorov: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya [Genre Features of Children’s Opera for Amateur Theater: on the Example of Musical Works by Composers of the Urals: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Ekaterinburg, 2012. 182 p.
4. Zharkova V. B. Progulki v muzykal’nom mire Morisa Ravelya (v poiskakh smysla poslaniya Mastera): monografiya [Promenades in the Musical World of Maurice Ravel (in Search of the Sense of the Master’s Message): Monographic Work]. Kiev: Avtograf, 2009. 528 p.
5. Zavarova A. V. Mif o detstve. Osmyslenie detstva v iskusstve kontsa XIX – nachala XX vekov [The Myth about Childhood. Interpretation of Childhood in the Art of the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries]. Detskaya literatura [Children’s Literature]. 1994. No. 3, pp. 71–74.
6. Korobova A. G. Pastoral’ v muzyke evropeyskoy traditsii: k teorii i istorii zhanra. Issledovanie [The Pastoral in Music of the European Tradition: Concerning the Theory and the History of the Genre: Research]. Urals State M. P. Mussorgsky Conservatory. Ekaterinburg, 2007. 656 p.
7. Korobova A. G. Sud’ba fenomena i ponyatiya «zhanr» v muzykal’noy kul’ture noveyshego vremeni [The Destiny of the Phenomenon and the Concept of “Genre” in the Musical Culture of Contemporary Times]. Problemy muzykal’noj nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2013. No. 1, pp. 233–237.
8. Romanova L. V. Traditsii bidermayera v otechestvennom detskom fortepiannom al’bome [The Traditions of Biedermeier in the Children’s Album for Piano in Russia]. Problemy muzykal’noj nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2015. No. 4, pp. 155–163. DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2015.4.155-163.
9. Smirnov V. V. Moris Ravel’ i ego tvorchestvo: monografiya [Maurice Ravel and his Oeuvres: Monographic Work]. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1981. 224 p.
10. Chesterton G. K. V zashchitu farforovykh pastushek [In Defense of Porcelain Shepherdesses]. Samosoznanie kul’tury i iskusstva XX veka. Mysliteli i pisateli Zapada o meste kul’tury v sovremennom obshchestve [The Consciousness of 20th Century Culture and Art. Thinkers and Writers of the West about the Position of Culture in Modern Society]. Moscow, 1991. 366 p.
11. Epshteyn M. Obrazy detstva [Images of Childhood]. Epshteyn M., Yukina E. Novyy mir [New World]. 1979. No. 12, pp. 242–257.
12. Christiaens J. Ravel ontrafeld: Leven en werk van Maurice Ravel. Leuven: Lipsius Leuven, Leuven University Press, 2015. 120 р.
13. Fillerup J. Ravel and Robert-Houdin, Magicians. 19th-Century Music. 2013. No. 2, pp. 130–158.
14. Kaminsky P. Unmasking Ravel: New Perspectives on the Music. Vol. 84. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, Boydell and Brewer, 2011. 352 р.
15. Kelly B. L. Music and Ultra-Modernism in France: A Fragile Consensus, 1913–1939: Music in Society and Culture. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer, Boydell Press, 2013. 269 р.
16. Morrison S. Debussy’s Toy Storie. The Journal of Musicology. 2013. No. 3, pp. 424–459.