So that the Spark of Mozart Would not be Extinguished: Concerning the Issue of Humanitarization of the Present-Day Educational System
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article substantiates the necessity of humanitarization of the system of education, which is compelled to
constantly overcome numerous contradictions characteristic for the contemporary globalizing world. These include
the sharp crisis of civilization, implicating a growing aggression in society, as well as the specificity of information
civilization, leading to standardization and unification of cultural values and a constantly increasing onslaught of
mass cultures, which is not in the least conducive to spiritual flourishing of humanity. A whole set of significant
aspects of the issue are disclosed, the immense relevance of which is determined by the interest in it on the part of
the members of the scholars’ community: philosophers, culturologists, sociologists, psychologists and pedagogues.
Based on the results of her research, the author of the article presents the chief methodological approaches to the
posed issue and the mechanisms conducive to overcoming the existent contradictions. The conclusion is arrived at,
according to which the humanitarization of the present-day system of education presents an effective instrument of
social adaptation of personality, the realization of its creative potential and, consequently, of social recovery and the
renewal of contemporary society.
Keywords: humanitarization of education, spiritual values, inter-cultural dialogue, aesthetics of thinking, aesthetics
of spiritual experience, artistic space of culture.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Brodsky I. A. Stikhotvoreniya [Poems]. Tallinn: Alexandra, 1991. 256 p.
3. Vygotsky L. S. Iskusstvo i psikhoanaliz [Art and Psychoanalysis]. Psikhologiya khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: khrestomatiya [The Psychology of Artistic Creativity: a Chrestomathy]. Minsk, 2003, pp. 22–43.
4. Gatchev G. D. Mental’nosti narodov mira [The Mentalities of the Peoples of the World]. Moscow: Algoritm, Eskmo, 2008. 544 p.
5. Denn M. Logika tvorcheskogo akta v filosofii Gustava Shpeta [The Logic of the Creative Act in the Philosophy of Gustav Schpett]. Gustav Shpet i sovremennaya filosofiya gumanitarnogo znaniya [Gustav Schpett and the Contemporary Philosophy of Humanitarian Knowledge]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur [The Languages of Slavic Cultures], 2006, pp. 236–250.
6. Ivanov S. P. Psikhologiya khudozhestvennogo deystviya subyekta [The Psychology of the Artistic Action of the Subject]. Moscow; Voronezh: Modek, 2001. 640 p.
7. Kagan M. S. Izbrannye trudy. Vyp. 1: Problemy metodologii [Selected Works. Issues of Methodology]. St. Petersburg: Petropolis, 2006. 356 p.
8. Kanke V. A. Etika otvetstvennosti. Teoriya morali budushchego [The Ethics of Responsibility. The Theory of Morality of the Future]. Moscow: Logos, 2003. 352 p.
9. Karavkin V. I. Ideal’naya model’ kul’tury [The Ideal Model of Culture]. Moscow: OGI, 2010. 336 p.
10. Clark J. Illustrirovannaya khronika otkrytiy i izobreteniy s drevneyshikh vremyon do nashikh dney. Nauka i tekhnologiya: lyudi, daty, sobytya [Illustrated Chronicles of Discoveries from the Earliest Times up to the Present Days. Science and Technology. People, Dates, Events]. Moscow: Astrel, 2002. 332 p.
11. Mamardashvili M. K. Estetika myshleniya [The Aesthetics of Thinking]. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy [The Moscow School of Political Research], 2001. 416 p.
12. Mandelstam O. E. Ob iskusstve [About Art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1995. 416 p.
13. Minayev E. A. Muzykal’no-informatsionnoye pole v evolutsionnykh protsessakh iskusstva: monografiya [The Musical Informational Field in the Evolutional Processes of Art: Monographic Work]. Moscow: Muzyka, 2000. 392 p.
14. Nadirova L. L. Struny obshchnosti: teoreticheskiye osnovy razvitiya empatii u studentov muzykal’no-pedagogicheskikh universitetov [The Strings of Community: The Theoretical Basis of the Development of Empathy in Students of Musical and Pedagogical Universities]. Vladimir: VPGU, 1999. 318 p.
15. Pabst A. Modely globalizatsii [The Models of Globalization]. Etnos. Normy i tsennosti v epokhu globalizatsii: nauch. konf. London, 14 oktyabrya 2013 [Ethnos. The Norms and Values in the Era of Globalization. London, October 14, 2013]. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2014, pp. 15–19.
16. Rank O. Estetika i psikhologiya khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [The Aesthetics and Psychology of Artistic Creativity]. Psikhologiya khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: khrestomatiya [The Psychology of Artistic Creativity: a Chrestomathy]. Minsk, 2003, pp. 5–21.
17. Rodin A. I. Besedy ob iskusstve [Conversations about Art]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2014. 320 p.
18. Roshak T. Istoki kontrkul’tury [The Sources of Counterculture]. Moscow: AST, 2014. 380 p.
19. Selchenok K. Khudozhestvo nashey zhizni [The Artistry of our Lives]. Psikhologia khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: khrestomatiya [The Psychology of Artistic Creativity. A Chrestomathy]. Minsk, 2003, pp. 432– 437.
20. Saint-Exupery, Antoine. Smysl zhizni [The Meaning of Life]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2013. 324 p.
21. Fromm E. Imet’ ili byt’ [To Have or to Be]. Moscow: AST, 2014. 320 p.
22. Fromm E. Iskusstvo byt’ [The Art of Being]. Moscow: AST, 2014. 348 p.
23. Shor Yu. M. Kul’tura kak perezhivaniye (Gumanitarnost’ kul’tury) [Culture as an Experience; The Humanitarian Aspect of Culture]. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2003. 220 p.
24. Yakovenko A. V. O kul’turno-tsivilizatsionnom mnogoobrazii mira [On the Cultural and Civilizational Diversity of the World]. Etnos. Normy i tsennosti v epokhu globalizatsii: nauch. konf. London, 14 oktyabrya 2013 [Ethnos. The Norms and Values in the Era of Globalization. London, October 14, 2013]. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2014, pp. 7–10.