The Trajectory of Dmitri Shostakovich’s Vocal Music
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dmitri Shostakovich’s contribution to vocal music presents one of the most remarkable pages of Russian music.
Altogether he composed in this genre for over fifty years. His early oeuvres (“Two Fables by Ivan Krylov” and “Six
Songs Set to Texts of Japanese Poets”) were to a large extent of experimental character, and they are distinguished
by their use of the orchestra, which would subsequently become a largely prevailing factor in the composer’s artistic
practice. Starting from the mid-1930s he makes a turn frontally to vocal genres, now already firmly relying on the
traditions of vocal intonating and most frequently setting texts of the great Russian literary classics (“Four Songs
to Texts by Alexander Pushkin,” “Four Monologues to Texts by Alexander Pushkin” and “Two Songs to Texts by
Mikhail Lermontov.”
A genuine masterpiece of the wartime years is the “Six Songs to Texts by English Poets,” in which the narration is
carried out from the position of a person from the ordinary masses, but notwithstanding all the simplicity of utterance,
its character is endowed by profundity and dimensionality. Somewhat later the vocal cycle “From Jewish Folk Poetry”
was composed, the essence of which lies in the depiction of the image of the “small person,” so characteristic for
Russian literature. The final period of Shostakovich’s vocal oeuvres was signified by extremely contrasting aspirations:
the “high” genre of intellectual lyricism, on the one hand, expressed in such works as the “Seven Poems of Alexander
Blok” and the “Six Poems of Marina Tsvetayeva,” and the consciously debased, almost “utilitarian” satire, on the
other hand, such as the “Satires,” the “Five Songs set to Texts from ‘Krokodil’ Magazine” and “Four Poems of Captain
Lebyadkin.” The concluding masterpiece of Shostakovich’s lyrical vocal music was the “Suite set to Poems by
Michelangelo” (1974), in which the composer turns to the “eternal questions” of existence.
Keywords: Shostakovich, Schostakovich’s vocal music, songs, vocal cycles.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Vasina-Grossman V. А. Kamerno-vokal’noe tvorchestvo Shostakovicha [The Vocal Chamber Works by Shostakovich]. Sovetskaya muzykal’naya kul’tura. Istoriya, traditsii, sovremennost’: sb. st. [Soviet Musical Culture: History, Tradition, Modernity: a Collection of Articles]. Edited by E. G. Daragan. Moscow, 1980, pp. 15–43.
3. Demchenko A. I. Voennaya tetralogiya Dmitriya Shostakovicha [The Military Tetralogy of Dmitri Shostakovich]. Muzyka i vremya [Music and Time]. 2015, No. 7, pp. 38–43.
4. Demchenko A. I. “Nos” Gogolya i Shostakovicha: dva “avangarda” [“The Nose” by Gogol and Shostakovich: Two “Avant-Gardes”]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Contemporary Issues of Science and Education]. 2013, No. 5, pp. 599–610.
5. Kurysheva T. A. Blokovskiy tsikl D. Shostakovicha [Shostakovich Vocal Cycle set to the Poems of Blok]. Blok i muzyka: sb. st. [Blok and Music: a Compilation of Articles]. Edited by M. A. Elik. Leningrad; Moscow,1972, pp. 214–228.
6. Levaya T. N. Tayna velikogo iskusstva (o pozdnikh kamerno-vokal’nykh tsiklakh D. D. Shostakovicha) [The Mystery of Great Art (About the Late Chamber- Vocal Cycles of Shostakovich)]. Muzyka Rossii [Music of Russia]. Issue 2. Moscow, 1978, pp. 291–328.
7. Mnatsakanova E. A. O tsikle Shostakovicha “Sem’ romansov na stikhi Aleksandra Bloka” [About Shostakovich’s Cycle “Seven Songs on Poems of Alexander Blok”]. Muzyka i sovremennost’ [Music and Modernity]. Issue 7. Moscow, 1977, pp. 69–87.
8. Bartlett R. Shostakovich and Chekhov. Shostakovich in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, рр. 199–218.
9. Gerstel J. Irony, Deception, and Political Culture in the Works of Dmitri Shostakovich. Mosaic (Winnipeg). Volume 32, No. 4, December 1999, pp. 56–71.
10. Kinetz E. The Rehabilitations of Shostakovich. The American Prospect, Vol. 11, No. 18, August 14, 2000, pp. 34–52.
11. Laurel E. Shostakovich: A Life. Oxford University Press, 2005. 458 p.
12. Wilson E. Interpreting Shostakovich’s Eclectic Second Cello Concerto. Miranda Strings. Volume 26, No. 5, December 2011, pp. 73–92.