On a Few Techniques of Transformation in Performance of the Clavier Urtext Scores of J.S. Bach (on the Example of Compositions Written for Instructive Purposes)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The semantic organization of the musical text of Bach’s
clavier compositions known in contemporary performance
and pedagogical practice as instructive assumes one of its
most important features – quasi-orchestral-score qualities.
Intertextual incorporations of inclusions of images of “orchestral
sounds” are reflected in the clavier text with semantic structures
of musical dialogue – solo-continuo and ripieno-concertino. The
presence of such codified signs of the subject mater of music
making – the vertical and horizontal models as an indication of
interaction of members of an ensemble and the soloist – opens
for a performer the possibility of embodiment of timbre and
spatial-dynamic effects by means of the contemporary piano.
A variation-type re-exposition of the clavier text into a quasiorchestral
score may be carried out on the basis of special
technologies. The transformation of the source takes place by
means of a vertical repositioning of the parts, doubling, register
setting, the figured bass technique, and ornamentation. The
clavier urtext scores of Bach directly require this kind form of
work on performance, presenting simultaneously a documented
testimony of the music making practice of the epoch and the
guidelines for performance actions. All of this bears witness to
the fact that Bach’s clavier’s urtext scores could rightfully be
termed an encyclopedia of practical means of compositional
transformation and creative work with the musical text. The
didactical character of performance transformations reveals a
new outlook on the classic material, which embodies veritably
inexhaustible artistic resources.
Keywords: J.S. Bach, clavier urtext, musical dialogue,
Compositions Written for Instructive Purposes for clavier
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Bodki E. Interpretatsiya klavirnykh proizvedeniy I. S. Bakha. [Erwin Bodky. Interpretation of Bach’s Keyboard Works]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1989. 389 p.
3. Braudo I. A. Ob izuchenii klavirnykh sochineniy Bakha v muzikal’noy shkole [On Studying Bach’s Works for Keyboard in Music Schools]. Moscow: Klassika –XXI, 2001. 88 p.
4. Gordeyeva E. V. Syuzhety muzitsirovaniya v klavirnykh proizvedeniyakh I. S. Bakha [The Subject Matter for Music Making in J.S. Bach’s Keyboard Works]. Muzyka proshlogo i sovremennost’: sb.st. [Music of the Past and the Present Times: a Collection of Articles] Edited and Compiled by L. N. Shaymukhametova. Ufa: Laboratory of Musical Semantics, 2010, pp. 22–31.
5. Gordeyeva E.V. Muzykal’naya leksikografiya stsen i obrazov muzitsirovaniya v klavirnykh p’esakh “Frantsuzskikh syuit” I. S. Bakha [The Musical Lexicography of the Scenes and Images of Music in the Keyboard Pieces Comprising the “French Suites” of J.S. Bach]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship], 2008/1(2), pp.198–202.
6. Kuznetsova N. M. Semantika muzykal’nogo dialoga v p’esakh “Notnoi tetradi Anny Magdaleny Bakh” [The Semantics of Musical Dialogue in the Pieces Comprising the “Notebook of Anna Magdalena Bach”]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship], 2007/1, pp. 249–256.
7. Kuznetsova N. M. Tvorcheskoe vzaimodeistvie ispolnitelya s muzykal’nym tekstom (na primere instruktivnykh sochineniy I. S. Bakha dlya klavira): dis. … kand. iskusstvoznaniya [The Creative Interaction of the Performer with the Musical Text (on the Example of I.-S. Bach’s Instructive Compositions for Keyboard): A Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Ufa: Laboratory for Musical Semantics, 2005. 261p.
8. Morein K. N. Partiturnye priznaki teksta v klavirnykh sonatakh D. Skarlatti [The Notational Indications of the Text in Keyboard Sonatas of Domenico Scarlatti]. Problemy muzykal’noi nauki [Music Scholarship], 2010/2(7), pp.194–197.
9. Shaymukhametova L.N. Semantika muzykal’nogo dialoga v klavirnykh proizvedeniyakh zapadnoevropeiskikh kompozitorov [The Semantics of Musical Dialogue in the Works for Keyboard by West European Composers]. Sematika starinnogo urteksta: Sb. st.[The Semantics of the Early Urtext: a Compilation of Articles]. Edited and compiled by L. N. Shaymukhametova. Ufa: Laboratory for Musical Semantics, 2002, pp. 16–36.
10. Shaymukhametova L.N., Usufbaeva G.R. Instruktivnye sochineniya I.-S. Bakha dlya klavira v praktike obucheniya tvorcheskomu muzitsirovaniyu [Instructive Compositions for Keyboard in the Practice of Teaching Creative Performance of Music]. Ufa, 1998. 111 p.