The Reception of Russian Music in Riga During the 1860s and 1870s: The Characteristic Opinions Manifested in Press Reviews
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article characterizes the reception of Russian music in Riga in the 1860s and 1870s and
highlights the reasons for such a reception. For this purpose, a contextual analysis of the main
positions manifested by music critics and their historical background is carried out.
Already since the 13th century Germans had dominated the economic, cultural and language
spheres of Riga. In the 1860s the situation began to change significantly. This was because of
active migration on the part of representatives of other nationalities (Latvians and Russians) to
Riga, resulting in an increase in the influence of their communities. In the 1870s, there was a sharp
exchange of opposing views between the Russian and German press, for example, the discussion
described in this article about the need to open a Russian theater with its own opera troupe in Riga.
The reception of several works by Russian composers (Serenade Russe and Caprice Russe by
Anton Rubinstein, A Life for the Tsar by Mikhail Glinka), performed in Riga, is also examined.
A comparative analysis of the press reviews makes it possible for us to conclude: notwithstanding
the manifold political disagreements between the Baltic German and Russian communities of Riga,
both sides also tried to search for shared values, and music presented a field not only of rivalry and
controversies, but also of a search for mutual understanding.
Keywords: Baltic Germans and Russians, sociocultural context, music criticism, Anton
Rubinstein, Mikhail Glinka.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Cīrulis K. Singing a Nation: The Latvian Song Festival as an Intercultural Medium for National Identity. Letonica. 2018. No. 37, pp. 63–81.
3. Helmers R. M. Not Russian Enough? Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism in Nineteenth Century Russian Opera. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2014. 233 p.
4. Jaffé D. Historical Dictionary of Russian Music. Lanham, etc.: The Scarecrow Press, 2012. 419 p.
5. Karkina S. V. The Sound Imitation of Some National Instruments in Piano Music. Revista San Gregorio. 2018. No. 27, pp. 7–13.
6. Plath U. Heimat: Rethinking Baltic German Spaces of Belonging. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi [Studies on Art and Architecture]. 2014. 23 (3–4), pp. 55–78.
7. Taruskin R. Defining Russia Musically. Historical and Hermeneutical Essays. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000. 598 p.
8. Volkovs V. Krievi Latvijā XIX gadsimtā un XX gadsimta sākumā [Russians in Latvia in the 19th Century and at the Beginning of the 20th Century]. In: I. Apine & V. Volkovs. Slāvi Latvijā (Etniskās vēstures apcerējums) [Slavs in Latvia. Reflection on the Ethnic History]. Rīga: Mācību Apgāds, 1998. 251 p.
9. Wezel K. Introduction: German Community – German Nationality? Baltic German Perceptions of Belonging in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century. Journal of Baltic Studies. 2017. 48 (1), pp. 1–11.