The Reception of Russian Music in Riga During the 1860s and 1870s: The Characteristic Opinions Manifested in Press Reviews

Main Article Content

Baiba Jaunslaviete

Abstract

The article characterizes the reception of Russian music in Riga in the 1860s and 1870s and
highlights the reasons for such a reception. For this purpose, a contextual analysis of the main
positions manifested by music critics and their historical background is carried out.
Already since the 13th century Germans had dominated the economic, cultural and language
spheres of Riga. In the 1860s the situation began to change significantly. This was because of
active migration on the part of representatives of other nationalities (Latvians and Russians) to
Riga, resulting in an increase in the influence of their communities. In the 1870s, there was a sharp
exchange of opposing views between the Russian and German press, for example, the discussion
described in this article about the need to open a Russian theater with its own opera troupe in Riga.
The reception of several works by Russian composers (Serenade Russe and Caprice Russe by
Anton Rubinstein, A Life for the Tsar by Mikhail Glinka), performed in Riga, is also examined.
A comparative analysis of the press reviews makes it possible for us to conclude: notwithstanding
the manifold political disagreements between the Baltic German and Russian communities of Riga,
both sides also tried to search for shared values, and music presented a field not only of rivalry and
controversies, but also of a search for mutual understanding.

Keywords: Baltic Germans and Russians, sociocultural context, music criticism, Anton
Rubinstein, Mikhail Glinka.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaunslaviete, B. (2019). The Reception of Russian Music in Riga During the 1860s and 1870s: The Characteristic Opinions Manifested in Press Reviews. Music Scholarship / Problemy Muzykal’noj Nauki, (4), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.17674/1997-0854.2019.4.057-064
Section
International Division
Author Biography

Baiba Jaunslaviete, Jāzeps Vītols Latvian Academy of Music

Dr.Sci. (Arts), Associate Professor at the Department of Musicology

References

1. Bolin P. & C. Douglas. ‘National indifference’ in the Baltic Territories? A Critical Assessment. Journal of Baltic Studies. 2017. 48 (1), pp. 13–22.
2. Cīrulis K. Singing a Nation: The Latvian Song Festival as an Intercultural Medium for National Identity. Letonica. 2018. No. 37, pp. 63–81.
3. Helmers R. M. Not Russian Enough? Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism in Nineteenth Century Russian Opera. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2014. 233 p.
4. Jaffé D. Historical Dictionary of Russian Music. Lanham, etc.: The Scarecrow Press, 2012. 419 p.
5. Karkina S. V. The Sound Imitation of Some National Instruments in Piano Music. Revista San Gregorio. 2018. No. 27, pp. 7–13.
6. Plath U. Heimat: Rethinking Baltic German Spaces of Belonging. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi [Studies on Art and Architecture]. 2014. 23 (3–4), pp. 55–78.
7. Taruskin R. Defining Russia Musically. Historical and Hermeneutical Essays. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000. 598 p.
8. Volkovs V. Krievi Latvijā XIX gadsimtā un XX gadsimta sākumā [Russians in Latvia in the 19th Century and at the Beginning of the 20th Century]. In: I. Apine & V. Volkovs. Slāvi Latvijā (Etniskās vēstures apcerējums) [Slavs in Latvia. Reflection on the Ethnic History]. Rīga: Mācību Apgāds, 1998. 251 p.
9. Wezel K. Introduction: German Community – German Nationality? Baltic German Perceptions of Belonging in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century. Journal of Baltic Studies. 2017. 48 (1), pp. 1–11.