The Peculiar Features of Singing “Following the Napevka” of the Irmoses “I Shall Open My Mouth” in the Community of Old-Believers in the Village of Dersu in the Primorye Region
Main Article Content
Abstract
An original element of the Old-Believers’ liturgical singing culture,
which has not been adequately studied, is the singing “following
the napevka” – an orally transmitted simplified version of the
kryuki chant, which is prominent in the community. In 2012–
2013 as part of field research in the Old-Believers’ communities
of the Primorye Region, the author collected and processed an
immense amount of musical material. A comparative analysis
was made of singing “following the napevka” of the Irmoses
“I Shall Open My Mouth” in a community of the village Dersu
formed of families of émigrés who had returned to the Primorye
Region from Latin America, as well as communities from other
regions of Russia. The article demonstrates the similarities with
and differences between this stratum of singing culture and the
liturgical practices of communities of Western and Central parts
of Russia. By applying a method of graphical visualization, the
author shows the commonality of musical thought of the Far-
Eastern communities of Old-Believers with the singing culture
of Early Rus, preserved in the communities of Old-Believers
in Russia. The hypothesis is brought out of the connection
between the similarities and the discrepancies in the chant with
the canonical mode, the peculiarities of performance of liturgical
singing in the community of the village of Dersu are described,
and perspectives of further research are outlined.
Keywords: the Old-Believers, liturgical singing traditions,
singing “following the napevka”
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Vladyshevskaya T.F. K voprosu ob izuchenii traditsii drevnerusskogo pevcheskogo iskusstva [Concerning Studies of the Traditions of Early Russian Art of Church Singing]. Iz istorii russkoy i sovetskoy muzyki [From the History of Russian and Soviet Music]. Ed. A. I. Kandinskiy. Issue 2. Moscow, 1976, pp. 40–61.
3. Denisov N. G. Strel'nikovskiy khor Kostromskoy zemli. Traditsii staroobryadcheskogo tserkovnogo peniya [The Strelnikovsky Choir in the Kostroma Region. The Traditions of the Old-Believers’ Church Singing]. Moscow: Progress- Traditsiya Press, 2005. 552 p.
4. Konyakhina E. V. Glasovaya organizatsiya pevcheskikh stiley staroobryadcheskoy sluzhby: avtoref. dis. … kand. iskusstvovedenia [The Glas Organization in the Singing Styles of the Old-Believers’ Service: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Magnitogorsk, 1999. 27 p.
5. Lupinos S. B. K voprosu o edinorazdel'nosti kvartovykh/ tertsovykh ladovylh ob‘‘emov v ambituse obikhodnogo zvukoryada [Concerning the Issue of Unity and Division of the Quartal-Tertian Modal Proportions in the Ambitus of the Canonical Scale]. Vizantiyskiy sled v kul'ture i iskusstve Tikhookeanskogo poberezh'ya v prostranstve poliloga Kitay– Koreya–SHSA–Avstraliya–Rossiya: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [The Byzantine Trace in the Culture and Art of the Pacific Coast in the Spatial Polylogue of China–Korea–USA–Australia– Russia: Materials of the International Musicological Conference]. Vladivostok, 2012, pp. 200–206.
6. Pavlova P. A. Ritmicheskie osobennosti malogo znamennogo rospeva v pevcheskoy praktike staroobryadtsev: na materiale kazanskoy traditsii: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedenia [The Rhythmic Features of the Lesser Znamenny Chant in the Church Singing Practice of the Old-Believers: on the Materials of the Kazan Tradition: Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Kazan', 2009. 346 p.
7. Polozova I. V. Tserkovno-pevcheskaya kul'tura saratovskikh staroobryadtsev v istoricheskom aspekte: dis. … doktora iskusstvovedenia [The Culture of Church Singing of the Saratov Old-Believers in a Historical Aspect: Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Arts]. Saratov, 2009. 332 p.
8. Traditsii dukhovnogo peniya v kul'ture staroobryadtsev Altaya [The Traditions of Sacred Singing in the Culture of the Old-Believers of the Altai Region]. T. G. Kazantseva, N. S. Murashova, O. A. Svetlova etc. Novosibirsk: Nauka Press, 2002. 494 s.
9. Fedorenko T. G. K probleme opredeleniya staroobryadcheskoy napevki [Concerning the Issue of Determining the Napevki in the Old-Believers’ Singing Tradition]. Staroobryadchestvo: Istoriya, kul'tura, sovremennost'. Tezisy [The Old-Believers: History, Culture, Modernity. Abstracts]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 249–251.
10. Kholopov Yu. N. The Canonic Scale. Musical Encyclopedia [In Russian]. Ed. Yu. V. Keldysh. Vol. 3. Moscow, 1976, pp. 1067–1069.