Questions of Teaching Rhythm in the System of Preparation of the Pedagogue Musician
Main Article Content
Abstract
The reform of the Russian higher and intermediate musical education, which began in the late 20th century created
the possibility of gradually setting forth a system of preparation of pedagogues of the middle ranking in the specialization
of “Music Theory” in the sphere of education in the sphere of musical rhythm. The implementation of new standards
for institutions of higher education have made it possible to include in the list of subjects of the working curriculum of
conservatories in the specialization of “Musicology” disciplines of education in the sphere of musical rhythm which
provide for the corresponding profile preparation of future specialists for children’s educational institutions. The article
acquaints us with some historical suppositions, methodological foundations, the structure and details of disciplines
responsible for the metro-rhythmic development of young musicians. The opinion of psychologists is presented,
who indicate to pedagogues at the necessity of special attention towards the development of rhythmical capabilities
of the students. Characterization is provided of the subjects included in the curriculum of the Magnitogorsk State
Conservatory – “The Methodology of Instruction of Rhythm,” “Tutorial Practice of Pedagogical Work (Rhythm).”
Keywords: musical rhythm, education in the sphere of musical rhythm, musical rhythmical capabilities.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Efremova N. I. Rol' izucheniya kontseptsii muzykal'no-ritmicheskogo vospitaniya XX veka (v podgotovke sovremennogo muzykanta-pedagoga) [The Role of Studying the Concept of Instruction in Musical Rhythmic Education in the 20th Century (in the Preparation of a Contemporary Musician-Teacher)]. Vestnik Magnitogorskoy gosudarstvennoy konservatorii [Bulletin of the Magnitogorsk State Conservatory]. 2001. No. 2, pp. 22–27.
3. Efremova N. I. Teoriya i metodika muzikal'no-ritmicheskogo vospitaniya – model' kursa (prezentatsiya distsipliny). [The Theory and Methodology of Instruction of Musical Rhythm – Model of a Course (Presentation of the Discipline)]. Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii kul'tury i iskusstv [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts]. 2012. No. 3 (31), pp. 97–101.
4. Zhak-Dal'kroz E. Ritm [Jaques-Dalcroze E. Rhythm]. Moscow: Klassika-XXI, 2001. 247 p.
5. Kirnarskaya D. K. Psikhologiya muzykal'nykh sposobnostey. Muzykal'nye sposobnosti [Psychology of Musical Abilities. Musical Abilities]. Moscow: Talanty-XXI vek, 2004. 496 p.
6. Korobova A. G. About Historical Dance Music and the Possibilities of Studying it in Children’s Music Schools. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2018. No. 1 (30), pp. 145–155.
DOI: 10. 17674 / 1997-0854.2018.1.145-155.
7. Rossikhina V. P. N. G. Aleksandrova i ritmika Dal'croza v nashey strane [N. G. Aleksandrova and the Rhythmics of Dalcroze in our Country]. Iz proshlogo Sovetskoy muzykal'noy kul'tury [From the Past of the Soviet Musical Culture]. Issue 3. Moscow: Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1982, pp. 238–273.
8. Starcheus M. S. Slukh muzykanta [The Musician’s Hearing]. Moscow: Moscow State P. I. Tchaikovsky Conservatory. 2003. 640 p.
9. Teplov B. M. Problemy individual'nykh razlichiy [Issues of Individual Differences]. Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, 1961. 290 p.
10. Kholopova V. N. Ritmicheskie novatsii [Rhythmic Innovations]. Russkaya muzyka i XX vek [Russian Music and the 20th Century]. Ed. by M. G. Aranovskiy; State Institute of Art Studies. Moscow, 1990, pp. 553–588.
11. Shaymukhametova L. N. Veselaya ritmika. Kolokol'chiki. Semantika na urokakh sol'fedzhio [Merry Rhythmics. Bells: Semantics in Solfeggio Lessons]. Issue 3. Ufa: Laboratory of Musical Semantics of Ufa State Academy of Arts named after Zagir Ismailov, 2004. 17 p.
12. Shaymukhametova L. N. Plastika v elementakh muzykal'noy rechi [Plasticity in the Elements of Musical Speech]. Semanticheskiy analiz muzykal'noy temy [Semantic Analysis of a Musical Theme]. Moscow, 1989, pp. 47–56.
13. Shaymukhametova L. N. Contrapuntal Compositions in the Form of Historical Dances in the Conditions of Ensemble Music-Making. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2018. No. 1 (30), pp. 156–165.
DOI: 10. 17674 / 1997-0854.2018.1.156-165.
14. Fink-Klein W., Peter-Führe S., Reichmann I. Rhythmik im Kindergarten. 5. Auflage. Herder: Freiburg, 1992. 192 S.
15. Naville S. Psychomotorische Therapie und Musik. Pahlen (Hrsg.), Musiktherapie. Heyne: München, 1973. S. 125–131.
16. Orff G. Die Orff-Musiktherapie. Kindler: München, 1974. 173 S.
17. Strohm R. Musical Migration in Renaissance and Baroque. Österreichische Musikzeitschrift. 2017. Vol. 72, Issue 2, pp. 6–10.