The Basics of Monitoring the Process of Musical Pedagogy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents materials of research of the main approaches to monitoring musical education and upbringing.
The author analyzes research works connected with management of the educational process, the development of
a musician’s technique and culture. The variants of control of the mastery of the educational programs, from the
traditional systems of evaluation, test and exam questions and auditions of concert programs to contemporary forms
of testing, quizzes, questionnaires and the corresponding evaluation scales of concretization of competency-related
content of education in the spheres of art and culture by means of verbal concretization and perspective constructions
of content of reference scales developing the spiritual experience of the students are examined as some of the most
significant components of monitoring. Research of the subject-related concretization of the accessibility of evaluative
indicators has made it possible to democratize the understanding by the students of the content and the functioning of
professionally important qualities. The discovery of the correlation of understanding of the content of knowledge and
the capabilities of the musicians’ evaluative indicators by the subjects of the pedagogical process have made it possible
to concretize factual data necessary for saturating the educational and instructive process of the performing musician
and the components of his gnostic qualities, the prospects of inclusion the performing musician himself into the process
of monitoring. The author researches the possibilities of specification of the indicators of education, diagnostics and
prognostication of the educational process, as well as the results of education, which present a foundation for making
pedagogical decisions and the optimal functioning of the process of development of professionally acquire qualities
in relation to the musician’s concrete circumstances and personality. For this end the parameters of diagnostics,
prognostication and monitoring in of diagnostics, prognostication and monitoring in the process of musical pedagogy
are specified.
Keywords: scholarly research essence of the musical-pedagogical process, monitoring, diagnostics, prognosis,
effectiveness, self-development of the musician’s personality.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Evdokimova O. V. Pedagogicheskiy monitoring obrazovatel'nogo protsessa kak faktor sovershenstvovaniya obshcheobrazovatel'nogo uchrezhdeniya: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Pedagogical Monitoring of the Educational Process as a Factor of Perfection of the Educational Institution: Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Pedagogy]. Penza, 2009. 184 p.
3. Kireyeva Natalia Yu. Creative Artistic Activity of Personality and Student-Centered Education. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2018. No. 1, pp. 174–182. DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2018.1.174-182.
4. Mayorov A. N. Monitoring v obrazovanii [Monitoring in Education]. 3rd Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Moscow, 2005. 424 p.
5. Orlov A. A. Monitoring innovatsionnykh protsessov v obrazovanii [The Monitoring of Innovative Processes in Education]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. 1996. No. 3, pp. 9–15.
6. Podkovko E. N. Lichnostno orientirovannaya tekhnologiya formirovaniya professional'noy kompetentnosti u budushchikh uchiteley [Personally Oriented Technology of the Formation of the Professional Competence of Future Teachers]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena: aspirantskie tetradi [News of the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia: Postgraduates’ Notes]. 2008. No. 27, pp. 448–450.
7. Seregin N. V. Muzykal'naya pedagogika i psikhologiya [Musical Pedagogy and Psychology]. Barnaul, 2017. 179 p.
8. Seregin N. V. Psikhodidaktika muzykal'noy deyatel'nosti [The Psycho-Didactics of Musical Activity]. Barnaul, 2014. 180 p.
9. Stefanovskaya T. A. Pedagogika: nauka i iskusstvo [Pedagogy: Science and Art]. Moscow, 1998. 368 p.
10. Furtak E. M., Kunter M. Effects of Autonomy-supportive Teaching on Student Learning and Motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2012. Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 284–316.
11. Maralova T. P., Filipenkova O. G., Galitskikh E. O., Shulga T. I., Sidyacheva N. V., Ovsyanik O. A. Methods of Psychological and Pedagogical Accompaniment of First-Year Students in Process of Adapting to Learning at University. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 2016. Vol. 11, No. 17, pp. 10569–10579.
12. Puchkova E. B., Sukhovershina Yu. V., Temnova L.V. A Study of Generation Z’s Involvement in Virtual Reality. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2017. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 134–143.