About the Sources and Contemporary Condition of Musical Cognitive Science
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
of musical cognitive science. It is noted that by means of
musicology’s turn towards the cognitive scientific paradigm, the
study of the forms of musical being is carried out on the basis of
elaboration of informational torrents coming from the physical
world, biological matter, society and culture.
The cognitive research direction in musical scholarship is
at the stage of active formation, but already at the present time
brings music theory out onto a new scholarly level, touching upon
the entire surrounding world.
Musical cognitive science makes it possible to place new
accents pointing to the perspectives of understanding the meaningbearing
structure of interpretation its diverse connections with the
cognizing subject, his intellect, experience and level of mental
activity. From such positions musical cognitive science may be
examined not only as a basis for contemporary science, but also
as a means of integral knowledge about the art of music in the
system of the world order.
Keywords: cognitive theory, cognitive musicology, musical
cognition, interpretation
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Aranovskiy M. G. Muzykal’nyy tekst. Struktura i svoystva [The Musical Text. Structure and Properties]. Moscow: Muzyka Press, 1998. 344 p.
3. Baykieva R. M. O semioticheskikh aspektakh muzykal’noy interpretatsii [About the Semiotic Aspects of Musical Interpretation]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2009, No. 1 (4), pp. 29–39.
4. Bayazitova D. I. O semanticheskoy svyazi zagolovka i smyslovykh struktur muzykal’nogo teksta (na primerakh p’es detskogo fortepiannogo repertuara) [About the Semantic Connection of the Title and the Meaning-Bearing Structures of the Musical Text (on the Example of Piano Pieces for Children)]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2008, No. 1 (2), pp. 210–213.
5. Bibler V. S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul’tury. Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat’ pervyy vek [From the Teaching of Scholarship – to the Logic of Culture. Two Philosophical Introductions to the Twenty-First Century]. Moscow: IPL, 1991. 413 p.
6. Vartanov S.Ya. Kontseptsiya interpretatsii sochineniya v sisteme fortepiannoy kul’tury: dis. ... d-ra iskusstvovedeniya [The Concept of Interpretation of the Works in the System of Piano Culture: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Arts]. Saratov, 2013. 356 p.
7. Lotman Yu. M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta [The Structure of the Literary Text]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1970, pp. 17–49.
8. Medushevskiy V. V. Dvoystvennost’ muzykal’noy formy i vospriyatie muzyki [The Duality of Musical Form and Perception of Music]. Moscow: Muzyka Press, 1980, pp. 178–194.
9. Rags Yu. N. Akusticheskie znaniya v sisteme muzykal’nogo obrazovaniya [Acoustic Knowledge in the System of Music Education]. Ryazan: Litera M, 2010. 336 p.
10. Sukhantseva V. K. Muzyka kak mir cheloveka. Ot idei vselennoy – k filosofii muzyki [Music as the World of the Human Being. From the Idea of the Universe – to the Philosophy of Music]. Kiev: Fakt, 2000. 176 p.
11. Tyupa V. I. Ontologiya kommunikatsii [The Ontology of Communication]. Diskurs. 1998, No. 5/6, pp. 5–20.
12. Fuko M. Poryadok diskursa [Foucault, M. The Order of Discourse]. Volya k istine [The Will to the Truth]. Translation from the French. Moscow, 1996, pp. 10–99.
13. Kholopova V. N. Muzykal’nye emotsii [Musical Emotions]. Moscow: Multiprint, 2010. 175 p.
14. Khokhlova A. L. Kognitivnaya model’ teorii interpretatsii v muzykal’nom iskusstve. Na materiale kamerno-instrumental’nykh sochineniy venskikh klassikov: dis. ... d-ra iskusstvovedeniya [Cognitive Model of the Theory of Interpretation in Music. On the Material of Chamber and Instrumental Works of the Viennese Classics: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Arts]. Saratov, 2013. 357 p.
15. Shaymukhametova L. N. Semanticheskiy analiz muzykal’nogo teksta (o razrabotkakh problemnoy nauchno-issledovatel’skoy Laboratorii muzykal’noy semantiki) [The Semantic Analysis of the Musical Text (on the Research of the Issue Orientated Research Laboratory of Musical Semantics)]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2007, No. 1 (1), pp. 31–43.
16. Shaymukhametova L. N. Teoreticheskie osnovy kontseptsii: adaptatsiya k praktike [Theoretical Foundations of the Concept: Adaptation to Practice]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2011, No. 2 (9), pp. 227–229.
17. Bregman A. S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1990.
18. Deutsch D. Grouping mechanisms in music. The Psychology. 1982, pp. 299–348.
19. Ingram J. The Notation of Time. Contact Magazine: London, 1985, pp. 12–23.
20. Juslin P., Sloboda J. Music and emotion. Theory and research. Oxford: University Press, New York, 2001. 504 p.
21. Nattiez J. Musicologie generate et semiologie. Paris, 1987, рр. 294–296.
22. Risset J., Wessel D. Exploration of timbre by analysis and synthesis // The Psychology of Music. Edited by D. Deutsch. Academic, New York. Chap. 2. 1982, рр. 26–58.
23. Stefani G. On the Semiotics of Music // Music, Culture and Society. Edited by D. Scott. Oxford Univ. Press, 2000, рр. 50–233.
24. Tomic S., Janata P. Ensemble: A Web-Based System for Psychology Survey and EXperiment Management // Behavior Research Methods. 39 (3), 2007, рр. 635–650.
25. Umemoto T. Developmental approaches to music cognition and behavior // JSTOR: Music perception, 1996, рр. 353–365.