Yuri Nikolayevich Tyulin
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to the legacy of one of the greatest Russian scholars, Yuri Nikolayevich Tyulin (1893–
1978), the creator of fundamental concepts of music theory, which were developed by him in various branches
of musical scholarship: mode, harmony, texture, musical thematicism, motives, musical syntax and musical form
as fundamental categories of musical thinking. Yuri Tyulin is a scholar, who made a significant contribution to
research of theoretical issues of the folk music of Russia, Armenia, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and the Baltic
countries. He interpreted in an original way the issues of folk songs, musical performance practice, music history,
musical aesthetics and musical psychology.
The special merit of the article is that it was written by a musician who, being one of Tyulin’s closest students, and
having analyzed the scholar’s works, discloses the quintessence of his scholarly ideas and discoveries, the functional
theory of music, a new interpretation of the principles of form-generation and a new systematization of musical forms,
the construction of musical speech, the phenomenon of “crystallization of thematicism” and modal theory, which
makes possible to comprehend the scholarly and artistic legacy of Yurli Nikolayevich Tyulin in a systemic manner.
Keywords: Yuri Nikolayevich Tyulin, musical thematic material, crystallization of thematicism, mode, harmony,
texture, musical sonata form, phrase, motive, musical syntax.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Laul R. Kh. Motiv i muzykal’noe formoobrazovanie [The Motive and Musical Form-Generation]. Leningrad: Muzyka, 1987. 79 p.
3. Mikhaylov A. V. Gete i poeziya Vostoka [Goethe and the Poetry of the East]. Vostok – Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii [East – West. Research. Translations. Publications]. Moscow, 1985, pp. 83–128.
4. Privano N. G. Predislovie ko vtoromu izdaniyu [Preface to the Second Edition]. Tyulin Yu. N., Bershadskaya T. S., Pustyl’nik I. Ya., Pen A. A., Ter-Martirosyan T. G., Shnitke A. G. Muzykal’naya forma [Musical Form]. Moscow, 1974, pp. 2–5.
5. Ruch’evskaya E. A. Mysli o muzykal’noy forme [Thoughts about Musical Form]. Muzykal’naya akademiya [Musical Academy]. 1994. No. 4, pp. 77–78.
6. Ruch’evskaya E. A. Problemy muzykal’noy formy [Issues of Musical Form]. Yu. N. Tyulin. Uchenyy. Pedagog. Kompozitor: sb. st. [Yu. N. Tyulin. Scholar. Teacher. Composer: A Compilation of Articles]. Leningrad; Moscow, 1973, pp. 70–80.
7. Ruch’evskaya E. A. «Stroyenie muzykal’noy rechi» Yu. N. Tyulina i problema muzykal’nogo sintaksisa (Teoriya motiva) [“The Structure of Musical Speech” Yu. N. Tyulina and the Issue of Musical Syntax (The Theory of the Motive)]. Traditsii muzykal’noy nauki [Traditions of Music Scholarship]. Leningrad, 1989, pp. 26–45.
8. Ruch’evskaya E. A. Formoobrazuyushchiy printsip kak istoricheskaya kategoriya [The Form-Generating Principle as a Historical Category]. Istoriya i sovremennost’: sb. st. [History and Modernity: a Compilation of Articles]. Ed. by A. I. Klimovitsky, L. G. Kovnatskaya. Leningrad, 1981, pp. 120–138.
9. Tyulin Yu. N.; Bershadskaya, T. S.; Pustyl’nik, I. Ya.; Pen, A. A.; Ter-Martirosyan, T. G.; Shnitke, A. G. Muzykal’naya forma [Musical Form]. Ed. by Yu. N. Tyulin. Moscow, Muzyka,1974. 359 p.
10. Tyulin Yu. N. Vvedenie v garmonicheskiy analiz na osnove khoralov Bakha [Introduction to Harmonic Analysis on the Basis of Bach’s Chorales]. Leningrad: Publishing House of the Leningrad State Conservatory, 1927. 78 p.
11. Tyulin Yu. N. Kristallizatsiya tematizma v tvorchestve Bakha i ego predshestvennikov [Crystallization of Thematicism in the Music of Bach and his Predecessors]. Sovetskaya muzyka [Soviet Music]. 1935. No. 7, pp. 38–54.
12. Tyulin Yu. N. Kristallizatsiya tematizma v tvorchestve Bakha i ego predshestvennikov [Crystallization of Thematicism in the Music of Bach and his Predecessors]. Russkaya kniga o Bakhe: sb. st. [A Russian Book about Bach: a Compilation of Articles]. Moscow, 1986, pp. 249–266.
13. Tyulin Yu. N. Natural’nye i al’teratsionnye lady [Natural and Alternating Modes]. Moscow: Muzyka, 1971. 109 p.
14. Tyulin Yu. N. O proizvedeniyakh Betkhovena poslednego perioda. Tseplyaemost’ muzykal’nogo materiala [About the Works of Beethoven of his Final Period. The Memorability of the Musical Material]. Betkhoven: sb. st. [Beethoven: a Compilation of Articles]. Ed. by N. L. Fishman. Issue 1. Moscow, 1971, pp. 251–275.
15. Tyulin Yu. N. Parallelizmy v muzykal’noy teorii i praktike [Parallelisms in Musical Theory and Practice]. Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1938. 56 p.
16. Tyulin Yu. N., Privano N. G. Zadachi po garmonii [Exercises in Harmony]. Issue 1–2. Moscow: Muzyka, 1966. 263 p.
17. Tyulin Yu. N., Privano N. G. Uchebnik garmonii [A Terxtbook of Harmony]. Vol. 1–2. Second Edition. Moscow: Muzyka, 1964. 435 p.
18. Tyulin Yu. N. Stenogramma doklada Yu. N. Tyulina 11-go marta 1940 goda “Kristallizatsiya tematizma” [A transcript of Yuri Nikolayevich Tyulin’s Presentation on March 11, 1940 “The Crystallization of Thematicism”]. 50 p. Manuscript. From the Personal Archive of A. I. Klimovitsky.
19. Tyulin Yu. N. Stroyenie muzykal’noy rechi [The Structure of Musical Speech]. Leningrad: Muzgiz, 1962. 208 p.; Second Edition. Moscow: Muzyka, 1969. 173 p.
20. Tyulin Yu. N. Uchenie o garmonii. T. 1. Osnovnye problemy garmonii [Teaching of Harmony. Volume 1. The Basic Issues of Harmony]. Leningrad: Muzgiz, 1937. 192 p.; Second Edition. Leningrad; Moscow: Muzgiz, 1939. 196 p.; Third Edition, Revised and with an Introduction by N. G. Privano. Moscow: Muzyka, 1966. 223 p.
21. Kholopov Yu. N. Patriarkh sovetskoy muzykal’noy nauki [The Patriarch of Soviet Musical Scholarship]. Sovetskaya muzyka [Soviet Music]. 1974. No. 1, pp. 30–32.
22. Yuzhak K. I. Pererabotka rannikh fugett dlya II toma KhTK [Reuse of Bach’s Early Fuguettes in Volume II of the Well-Tempered Clavier].Yuzhak K. I. Polifoniya i kontrapunkt: voprosy metodologii, istorii, teorii: izbr. st.: v 2 kn. [Polyphony and Counterpoint: Questions of Methodology, History, Theory: Selected Articles in 2 Books]. Book 1. St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 109–164.