On the Problem of Historical Evolution of the English Consort Genres of the XVI—XVII Centuries
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article deals with the problem of periodization
and genre-stylistic evolution of
English consort style. The author makes an
effort to restore the generic panorama of the
late-Renaissance and early-Baroque instrumental
ensemble music on the basis of recently published
critical editions. It is done by means of
correlating the results of analythical research
with the musical-stylistic characteristic of consort
compositions and ordering the chronological data
of the main stages in the history of
culture. Two points are made in the process:
first, that the birth of the genre of consort
music owes to the development of instrumentalism
and, second, that it is a product of a
gradual reorganization of late Renaissance and
early Baroque traditional generic-stylistic system
into late Baroque system.
Keywords: Baroque period music, England land music, instrumental consort, chamber ensemble
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Bocharov Yu. Mnogolikiy termin // Starinnaya muzyka. — 2004. — № 1—2. — S. 11—13.
3. Epishin A. Istoriya i teoriya ital'yanskoy trio-sonaty: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — SPb., 1995.
4. Konen V. Persell i opera. — M., 1975.
5. Konsort // Muzykal'nyy slovar' Grouva. — M., 2001. — S. 429.
6. Kofanova E. Angliyskie organ i zhanry organnoy muzyki XVI — pervoy poloviny XVII stoletiya // Starinnaya muzyka: Praktika. Aranzhirovka. Rekonstruktsiya: mater. nauch.-prakt. konf. — M., 1999. — S. 134—140.
7. Kofanova E. Traktat Tomasa Morli «Prostoe i dostupnoe vvedenie v prakticheskuyu muzyku»: voprosy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — M., 2000.
8. Livanova T. Istoriya zapadnoevropeyskoy muzyki do 1789 goda. — M., 1983. — T. 1: Po XVIII vek.
9. Palazhchenko I. R. Instrumental'naya fantaziya XVII—XVIII vekov: genezis i puti razvitiya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya. — M., 1992.
10. Protopopov Vl. Richerkar, kantsona, fanaziya — predshestvenniki fugi // Protopopov Vl. Ocherki iz istorii instrumental'nykh form XVI — nachala XIX veka. — M., 1979. — S. 6—64.
11. Saponov M. Iskusstvo improvizatsii: improvizatsionnye vidy tvorchestva v zapadnoevropeyskoy muzyke srednikh vekov i Vozrozhdeniya. — M. — 1982.
12. Uestrep Dzh. G. Persell. — M., 1980.
13. Charnaya N. Iz istorii angliyskoy verdzhinel'noy muzyki // Iz istorii zarubezhnoy muzyki. — M., 1980. — Vyp. 4. — S. 81—118.
14. Boyden D. D., Woodward A. M. Viola // The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians / ed. by: Stanley Sadie. — Macmillan Publishers Limited, 2001.
15. Coates W., Dart T. Introduction // Musica Britannica. — V. 9: Jacobean consort music. — London, 1955. — P. xv-xvii.
16. Chamber music in England // The New Oxford History of Music. — London, 1968. — V. 4: The Age of Humanism 1540—1630. — P. 581—591.
17. Davey H. The Student's Musical History. — London, 1919. — P. 27—29.
18. Edwards W. Introduction // Musica Britannica. — V. 40: Music for mixed consort. — London, 1955. — P. xiii-xv.
19. Elizabethan Music For Recorder. — N.Y., 1978.
20. Field C.-D.-S. Fantasia // The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians / ed. by: Stanley Sadie. — Macmillan Publishers Limited, 2001.
21. Harper J. Introduction // Musica Britannica. — V. 48: Orlando Gibbons: Consort Music. — London, 1982. — P. xv-xviii.
22. Peart D. Introduction // Musica Britannica. — V. 39: John Jenkins: Consort Music of Six Part. — London, 1977. — P. xiii-xvi.
23. Walker E. A History of music in England. — Oxford, 1958.
24. Musica Britannica. — London, 1955. — V. 9: Jacobean consort music.
25. Musica Britannica. — London, 1971. — V. 18: Music at the court of Henry.
26. Musica Britannica. — London, 1961. — V. 21: William Lawes: Select consort music.
27. Musica Britannica. — London, 1977. — V. 40: Music for mixed consort.
28. Musica Britannica. — London, 1979. — V. 44: Elizabethan consort music: 1.
29. Musica Britannica. — London, 1988. — V. 45: Elizabethan consort music: 2.
30. Musica Britannica. — London, 1982. — V. 48: Orlando Gibbons: Consort Music.
31. Musica Britannica. — London, 1991. — V. 60: William Lawes: Fantasia-suites.