Japanese and Russian, Mutual Influences of Two Musical Cultures
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article displays the results of study of the interaction
between Japanese and Russian musical cultures, presented from
the point of view of a Japanese musicologist. Such interaction
falls into three categories: the influence of Russian culture on
the Japanese in the past, the influence of Japanese culture on
Russian composer's music, and the interaction of both cultures
in the recent decades. The article reveals previously unpublished
information on this subject. The history of diplomatic relations
between Russia and Japan has begun in 1792, when Adam
Laksman and his colleagues visited Japan on board of
“Yekaterina”. That same ship had the Japanese sailors, saved
from the damaged ship, including Kodayu Daikokuya, the first
Japanese to bring a Russian folk song on the shores of Japan.
Many Russian white émigré musicians, including Leo Sirota,
Alexander Tcherepnin, and Anna Ono, have fled to Japan after
the 1917 revolution. Together with the German and French
musicians, they have contributed into the establishment of
European classical tradition on the Japanese Islands.
A number of visits of Russia by Japanese composers, such
as Kosaku Yamada and Yasushi Akutagawa played a significant
role. The Russian image of Japan owes primarily to the
aspects of ancient culture, such as haiku and tanka short poems,
Japanese watercolors, Ukuyo-e, as well as Zen Buddhism. In
this, the Russian appropriation of Japanese culture was similar
to that of French. A great number of compositions were written
on the verses of Japanese poets. The author suggests
chronological categorization of Russian music on the Japanese
lyrics. She reveals the coherence of ideas, of the choice of
instruments and timbral effects among these works. The author
witnesses that their adherence to the themes of Love, Death
and Nature stem from Zen and ancient Japanese literature. The
author notices that the World War Two marks the appearance
of a new theme of a Nuclear Holocaust of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. In the recent decades, new level of interaction is evident,
for example, in the use of traditional Japanese instruments,
such as the collaboration of koto player K Sawai and
Sofia Gubaidulina. By the end of the 20th century, open contacts
in the form of various concerts, pedagogic forums, festivals,
and competitions, were established between Japan and
Russia. The author's conclusion is that it is possible to enhance
ethnic identities of both cultures while avoiding their leveling,
homogenization and the loss of cultural uniqueness. That is the
way to develop mutual relationship in the 21st century.
Keywords: musical education, Japanese musical culture, national traditions, cultural connections
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.