The Orchestral Score Attributes of the Text of Keyboard Sonatas by Domenigo Scarlatti
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article brings into consideration the orchestral score characteristics of the keyboard Urtext’s of the sonatas by Domenigo Scarlatti. The method used here is based upon the possibility of variant unfolding of the keyboard notation into the scores for different instrumental ensembles. The author analyzes the structures which signal the presence of the non-keyboard aspects in the text of the sonatas and refers them to the notation for orchestra and chamber ensemble.
Keywords: D. Scarlatti, keyboard sonata, Urtext, quasi-score, meaning-bearing structures, semantic figures
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Aranovskiy M. G. Muzykal'nyy tekst. Struktura i svoystva. – M.: Kompozitor, 1998.
3. Gordeeva E. V. Muzykal'naya leksikografiya stsen i obrazov muzitsirovaniya v klavirnykh p'esakh «Frantsuzskikh syuit» I.-S. Bakha // Problemy muzykal'noj nauki. – 2008. – №1 (2). – S. 198-202.
4. Gordeeva E. V. Muzykal'no-akusticheskoe prostranstvo kak soderzhatel'nyy komponent muzykal'nogo proizvedeniya (na primere klavirnykh tekstov barokko) // Muzykal'noe soderzhanie: sovremennaya nauchnaya interpretatsiya: sb. nauchnykh statey. – Rostov n/D:Rostovskaya gos. konservatoriya im. S. V. Rakhmaninova, 2006. – S. 351-357.
5. Gordeeva E. V. Ornament kak smyslovaya struktura teksta klavirnykh proizvedeniy I.-S. Bakha // Muzyka v sovremennom mire: nauka, pedagogika, ispolnitel'stvo: tez. IV Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. 25 yanvarya 2008 g. / Tambovskiy gos. muz.-ped. in-t im. S. V. Rakhmaninova. – Tambov, 2008. – Ch. 1. – S. 16-18.
6. Gordeeva E. V. Tembrovaya variativnost' i akusticheskie obrazy muzykal'nykh instrumentov v «quasi-partiture» klavirnykh proizvedeniy I.-S. Bakha // Muzykal'naya semiotika: puti i perspektivy razvitiya: sb. st. po mater. II Mezhdunar. nauch. konferentsii «Muzykal'naya semiotika: puti i perspektivy razvitiya» 13-14 noyabrya 2008 g. – Astrakhan', 2008. – S. 93-97.
7. Gordeeva E. V. Syuzhetno-situativnyy znak «ansamblya solistov» i ego leksikografiya v klavirnykh sochineniyakh I.-S. Bakha // Ispolnitel'skoe iskusstvo i muzykovedenie. Paralleli i vzaimodeystviya: sb. st. Vseros. nauch. konf. 6-9 aprelya 2009 g. / GKA im. Maymonida. – M., 2009.
8. Kirichenko P. V. Intonatsionnaya leksika i artikulyatsiya plasticheskikh i ritoricheskikh figur v klavirnykh sochineniyakh barokko. – Ufa, 2002.
9. Kirichenko P. V. Tvorcheskoe vzaimodeystvie nachinayushchego pianista s klavirnym tekstom barokko // Muzykal'nyy tekst i ispolnitel'. – Ufa, 2004. – S. 57-72.
10. Kuznetsova N. M. Tvorcheskoe vzaimodeystvie ispolnitelya s muzykal'nym tekstom (na primere instruktivnykh sochineniy I.-S. Bakha dlya klavira: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. – Ufa, 2005.
11. Kuznetsova N. M. Semantika muzykal'nogo dialoga v p'esakh «Notnoy tetradi Anny Magdaleny Bakh» // Muzykal'nyy tekst i ispolnitel'. – Ufa, 2004. – S. 39-56.
12. Okrainets I. A. Domeniko Skarlatti: cherez instrumentalizm k stilyu. – M.: Muzyka, 1994.
13. Petrov Yu. Skarlatti D. // Muzykal'naya entsiklopediya / gl. red. Yu. V. Keldysh. – M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1981. – T. 5. – Stb. 46-50.
14. Semantika starinnogo urteksta: sb. st. / otv. red. L. N. Shaymukhametova. – Ufa, 2002.
15. Shaymukhametova L. N. Migriruyushchaya intonatsionnaya formula i semanticheskiy kontekst muzykal'noy temy. – M.: Gos. in-t iskusstvoznaniya, 1999.
16. Shaymukhametova L. N., Kirichenko P. V. Intonatsionnye etyudy v klasse fortepiano. Rolevye igry i zadaniya po kompozitsii (na materiale klavirnoy muzyki zapadnoevropeyskikh kompozitorov XVII – XVIII vv.): ucheb. posobie. – Ufa, 2002.
17. Shaymukhametova L. N., Yusufbaeva G. R. Instruktivnye sochineniya I.-S. Bakha dlya klavira v praktike obucheniya tvorcheskomu muzitsirovaniyu. – Ufa, 1998.
18. Carole F. Vidali Alessandro and Domenico Scarlatti: A Guide to Research. – Garland Publishing, 1993.
19. Flannery M. A Chronological Order For The Keyboard Sonatas Of Domenico Scarlattti (1685-1757) (Studies in the History and Interpretation of Music). – Edwin Mellen Press, 2004.
20. Kirkpatrick R. Domenico Scarlatti. – Princeton, 1953; 1970.
21. Place A. de. Scarlatti. – Fayard, 2003.
22. Sutcliffe W. D. The Keyboard Sonatas of Domenico Scarlatti and Eighteenth-Century Musical Style.