The Sound Cosmography of Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov and Richard Wagner
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the principles of interaction of the sacred
and musical texts of the operas of Richard Wagner and Nikolai
RimskyKorsakov.
The greatest amount of attention is given to the
aspect of direct interaction with the musical fabric that is studied
on the material of the orchestral introductions to the operas.
Based on the conclusions of the analysis of four contrasting
examples: the opening sections (before the raising of the curtains,
according to the composers’ instructions in the score) of the
operas “Das Rheingold,” “Götterdämmerung,” “Mlada” and “The
Snow Maiden,” both the common features and the individual
peculiarities of the myth and ritual origin in each case. The
instrumental introductions to the operas of Wagner’s “Ring” have
a similar type of expression of the myth and ritualbased
universe
in the musical fabric, whereas RimskyKorsakov’s
operas reveal
various variants of interaction, possessing traits both similar to
Wagner’s (“such as “The Snow Maiden”) and contrasting to them.
Keywords: myth, ritual, opera, Richard Wagner, Nikolai
RimskyKorsakov,
tetralogy
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Barsova I. A. Mifologicheskaya semantika vertikal’nogo prostranstva v orkestre R. Vagnera [The Mythological Semantics of Vertical Space in the Orchestra of Richard Wagner]. Problemy muzykal’nogo romantizma: sb. nauch. trudov LGITMiK [Issues of Musical Romanticism: Compilation of Scholarly Articles of the Leningrad State Institute of Theatre, Music and Cinematography]. Leningrad, 1987, pp. 59–75.
3. Lobanova M. N. Voploshchenie mifa v «Kol’tse nibelungov» R. Vagnera [The Embodiment of Myth of Richard Wagner’s “Ring of the Nibelungs”]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Problems Musical Science]. Vol. 7. Moscow, 1989, pp. 266–290.
4. Neizdannyy Ivan Lapshin [The Unpublished Ivan Lapshin]. Compiled by L. G. Barsova. St. Petersburg: Press of the St. Petersburg Academy of Theatre Arts, 2006. 424 p.
5. Nikolayeva N. S. «Kol’tso nibelunga» Rikharda Vagnera [“The Ring of the Nibelungs” by Richard Wagner]. Moscow: Moscow Conservatory, 1997. 80 p.
6. Petrushevich Yu.Yu. Arkhetipicheskie motivy v opernom tvorchestve N. A. Rimskogo-Korsakova: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya [The Archetypal Motives in the Operas of N. A. RimskyKorsakov: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Art]. Moscow], 2008. 200 p.
7. Porir’eva A. L. Vagnerovskiy mif i germanskiy epos (K voprosu o srednevekovykh istochnikakh «Kol’tsa nibelungov») [Wagner’s Myth and German Epic (Concerning the Question of the Medieval Sources of “Der Ring des Nibelungen”)]. Muzykal’naya kul’tura srednevekovya. Teoriya. Praktika. Traditsiya: sb. nauch. tr. [Musical Culture of the Middle Ages. Theory. Practice. Tradition: Compilation of Scholarly Articles]. Leningrad State Institute of Theatre, Music and Cinematography. Leningrad, 1988, pp. 149–167.
8. Rakhmanova M. P. Nikolay Andreevich Rimskiy-Korsakov [Nikolai A. Rimsky-Korsakov]. Moscow: Petit, 1995. 240 p.
9. Serebryakova L. A. Obrazy bytiya v khudozhestvennoy kartine mira N. A. Rimskogo-Korsakova [Images of Being in N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov’s Artistic Worldview]. Russkaya khudozhestvennaya kul’tura vtoroy poloviny XIX veka [The Russian Artistic Culture of the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Vol. 2: Kartina mira [A Picture of the World]. Мoscow, Nauka, 1991, pp. 227–258.
10. Skrynnikova O. A. Slavyanskiy kosmos v pozdnikh operakh N. A. Rimskogo-Korsakova: dis. … kand. Iskusstvovedeniya [The Slavic Universe in the Late Operas of Nikolai RimskyKorsakov: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate ofA rt]. Moscow, 2000. 191 p.
11. Tatarintseva I. V. Mifologicheskie aspekty strukturnokompozitsionnogo myshleniya R. Vagnera [The Mythological Aspects of the Structural and Compositional Thinking of Richard Wagner]. Tambov: Musical Pedagogical Institute, 1997. 32 p.
12. Freydenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myths and Literature of Antiquity]. Moscow: Eastern Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1998. 800 p.
13. Borchmeyer D. Das Theater Richard Wagners: Idee – Dichtung – Wirkung. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1982. 430 p.
14. Donington R. Wagner’s Ring and Its Symbols: The Music and the Myth. London: Faber & Faber, 1974. 342 p.
15. Janz T. Klangdramaturgie. Studien zur theatralen Orchesterkomposition in Wagners «Ring des Nibelungen». Wagner in der Diskussion. Würzburg: Königshausen&Neumann, 2006. Band 2. 364 s.