Edison Denisov and the Soviet Musical Avant-Garde of the 1960-70
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of avant-garde in Russian musical art of the 20th century. The author shows the contradictory views on this phenomenon in art as a whole and in music in particular. The author stresses E. Denisov’s contribution into avantgarde in Soviet music of the 1960-70s. The author is convinced that it was the artistic figure of Denisov which have made possible the introduction of the avant-garde into the Soviet Union.
Keywords: Modern music, avant-garde, modern harmony, innovations and traditions
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Григорьева Г. Новые эстетические тенденции музыки второй половины ХХ века. Стили. Жанровые направления // Теория современной композиции / отв. редактор В. Ценова. – М.: Музыка, 2005.
3. Денисов Э. Додекафония и проблемы современной композиторской техники // Музыка и современность. – М.: Музыка, 1969. – Вып. 6.
4. Денисов Э. Стабильные и мобильные элементы музыкальной формы и их взаимодействие // Теоретические проблемы музыкальных форм и жанров. – М.: Музыка, 1971.
5. Денисов Э. Вариации ор. 27 для фортепиано А. Веберна // Современная музыка и проблемы эволюции композиторской техники. – М.: Сов. композитор, 1986. 6. Денисов Э. Новая музыка – это не мода // Другое искусство. Москва 1956–1976. К хронике художественной жизни. Т. 1. – М., 1991.
7. Денисов Э. Новая техника – это не мода // Свет. Добро. Вечность. Памяти Эдисона Денисова. Статьи. Воспоминания. Материалы. – М.: Московская гос. консерватория, 1999.
8. Жаркова В. Прогулки в музыкальном мире Мориса Равеля (в поисках смысла послания мастера). – Киев: Автограф, 2009.
9. Иванов В. Практика авангарда и теоретическое знание ХХ века // Избранные труды по семиотике и истории культуры. Т. 4: Знаковые системы культуры, искусства и науки. – М.: Языки славянских культур, 2007.
10. Кандинский В. О духовном в искусстве (живопись). – Л., 1990.
11. Каспаров Ю. Денисов и мы в пространстве Новой музыки // Свет. Добро. Вечность. Памяти Эдисона Денисова. Статьи. Воспоминания. Материалы. – М.: Московская гос. консерватория, 1999.
12. Левая Т. Скрябин и художественные искания ХХ века. – СПб.: Композитор – Санкт-Петербург, 2007.
13. Неизвестный Денисов / под ред. В. Ценовой. – М., 1997.
14. Пекарский М. Назад к Волконскому вперёд. – М.: Композитор, 2005.
15. Сафронов А. «Posthumus» (Воспоминания и рефлексии о Денисове) // Свет. Добро. Вечность. Памяти Эдисона Денисова. Статьи. Воспоминания. Материалы. – М.: Московская гос. консерватория, 1999.
16. Свет. Добро. Вечность. Памяти Эдисона Денисова. Статьи. Воспоминания. Материалы. – М.: Московская гос. консерватория, 1999.
17. Селицкий А. Николай Каретников. Выбор судьбы: исследование. – Ростов н/Д: Книга, 1997.
18. Холопов Ю. К единому полю звука: «Nr. 2» Карлхайнца Штокхаузена // Музыкальная культура в Федеративной республике Германии. – Gustaw Bosse Verlag, 1994.
19. Холопов Ю. Эдисон Денисов и музыка конца века // Свет. Добро. Вечность. Памяти Эдисона Денисова. Статьи. Воспоминания. Материалы. – М.: Московская гос. консерватория, 1999.
20. Холопова В. Формы музыкальных произведений: учеб. пособие. – СПб.: Лань, 1999.
21. Холопова В. София Губайдулина. – М.: Композитор, 2008.
23. Шнитке А. Эдисон Денисов // Шнитке А. Статьи о музыке. – М.: Композитор, 2004.
24. Шульгин Д. Годы неизвестности Альфреда Шнитке (беседы с композитором).– М.: Деловая лига, 1993.
25. Шульгин Д. Признание Эдисона Денисова (по материалам бесед). – М.: Композитор, 1998.
26. Фрагменты о Денисове [Электронный ресурс] 1975, 1976–1977, 1978–1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984– 1986, 1987–1990, 1990 (Булез), 1994–1996, 1995, 1996 (I), 1996 (II). – URL: http://homepage.ntlworld. com/ dmitrismirnov/ denfrag1.html.