Thomas Mann and Paul Hindemith: the Myth of “Harmonia Mundi”
Main Article Content
Abstract
and ancestral memory, the 20th century artist aspires to imprint
the norms of gumanity into the image of integral existence. The
subject of artistic creativity in its spiritual and moral meaning becomes
crucial for art. The synthesis of genres, which almost the
entire 20th century is marked with, leads us out into the contiguous
ields of artistic experience. Paul Hindemith’s “Harmonia Mundia,”
presenting a dyad of symphony and opera, accumulates into
itself an enormous context of 20th century humanistic culture, part
of which is comprised by Thomas Mann’s novels “Doctor Faustus”
and “Joseph and his Brothers.” The mirror-relecting ields of
their musical legacy disclose laws and means of construction of
an artistic unity, the basis of which is formed by the myth of Harmonia
Mundi. The aim of the article is to comprehend the conception
of Paul Hindemith’s compositional conception by means
of comparison with Thomas Mann’s literary legacy. The poetics
of the mythological novel formulated by E. Meletinsky, as well
as the mythological-symbolic method of musical scores developed
by N. Beketova make it possible to ind textual and semantic
parallels between Mann’s and Hindemith’s plots. The mythological-
symbolic angle of research presents the operatic work within
the ield of co njugacy of meanings that are identical to Thomas
Mann’s landmark works. The atemporal logic of the main protagonist’s
symbolic path (Kepler = Faust) forms the German myth
of Harmonia Mundi.
Keywords: Paul Hindemith, Thomas Mann, “Harmonia
Mundi” symphony, philosophical mythological novel, existential
myth, archetype, mythologem
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Beketova N. V. Tragicheskoe i satiricheskoe v operah Shostakovicha: avtoref. dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya [The Tragic and the Satirical in Shostakovich’s Opera: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Moscow, 1991. 24 p.
3. Blok A. A. Krushenie gumanizma [The Breakdown of Humanism]. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. [Collection of Works in 6 Volumes]. Vol. 4. Moscow, 1982, pp. 327–347.
4. Levaya T. N. Leontyeva O. Paul’ Hindemit. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo. [Paul Hindemith. Life and Work]. Moscow, 1974. 460 p.
5. Mann T. Germaniya i nemtsy [Germany and the Germans]. Hudozhnik i obshhestvo. Stat’i i pis’ma [The Artist and Society. Articles and Letters]. Moscow, 1986, pp. 303–327.
6. Meletinskiy E. M. Poetika mifa [The Poetics of Myth]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976. 406 p.
7. Laas J. Paul Hindemith Motetten zur Weihnachtszeit ein Beitrag zur Kirchenmusik. Kirchenmusikalisches Jahrbuch, Heft 88, 2004, S. 95–114.
8. Hindemith P. Die Harmonie der Welt. Oper in fünf Aufzügen. B. Shott’s Söhn: Mainz, 440 S.