«Semantics of the Names of Popevkas and Their Musical Content in the Context of Comparative Byzantine-Russian Researches»
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The author investigates the semantics of the names of popevkas of Russian Znamennyi chant in the context of comparison with the Greek etymology of meanings of Byzantine monody, on the material of the Russian 17th-century Azbuka from the Library of Russian Academy of Sciences, manuscript number 32.16.18. The author uses methodology of comparative linguistics, musical comparative studies, and semiotics of art, philosophy and medieval culture aesthetics. Comparative research demonstrates such approaches of terminological self-determination in Znamennyi chant as 1) transposition, 2) “mentalization” of etymology of the Greek singing patterns, 3) tracing of such patterns using E.Vereschagin’s methodology, 4) visualization of signs, 5) creation of terms in Russian tradition proper. The received results suggest new approaches in comparative studies, allowing to revise the mechanisms of adaptation of the Byzantine tradition into Russia.
Keywords: semantics of popevkas, mechanisms of adaptation of the Byzantine art in Russia
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Алексеева Г. В. Дискурс понятий: византийский Агиополит и русская теория музыки // Этот многообразный мир музыки. Приношение Марку Генриховичу Арановскому: сб. ст. к 80-летию М. Г. Арановского. – М.: ГИИ, 2010. – С. 102-114.
3. Алексеева Г. В. Сакральный след греческого имени в интонации русской знаменной попевки: новые подходы в изучении вопроса адаптации певческой традиции (на материале русской певческой азбуки XVII века из Библиотеки Академии наук 32.16.18) // Коммуникации в искусстве и науке: сб. матер. конф. из цикла «Григорьевские чтения». – М.: Моск. гуманит. ун-т, 2010. – С. 69-84.
4. Бычков В. В. Русская средневековая эстетика XI-XVII века. – М.: Мысль, 1992.
5. Верещагин Е. М. Церковнославянская книжность на Руси. – М.: Индрик, 2001.
6. Герцман Е. В. Византийское музыкознание. – Л., 1988.
7. Грачёва Т. А. (Демьянчук) Терминология певческих теоретических руководств XV-XIX вв. // Древнерусское песнопение. Пути во времени. – СПб.: СПбГК им. Н. А. Римского-Корсакова, 2005. – Вып. 2. – С. 49-65.
8. Карастоянов Б. П. Попевки знаменного роспева. По материалам певческой книги Праздники, новая истинноречная редакция. Рукопись конца XVII в. – М. ГИМ, Синодальное певческое собрание № 41. – Wien, 2008.
9. Левшун Л. В. История восточнославянского книжного слова XI-XVII веков. – Минск: Экономпресс, 2001. – С. 54.
10. Металлов В. М. Русская семиография: из области церковно-певческой археологии и палеографии. Издание императорского Московского Археологического института им. Императора Николая II-го. – М., 1912.
11. Разумовский Д. В. О нотных безлинейных рукописях церковного знаменного пения // Труды Московского Археологического общества. Т. 1. Вып. 2, 1867.
12. Alekseeva Galina. Earthly and Divine in the «Soglasnik» from the Russian singing ABC book of the XVII century from the Library of Academy of Science 32.16.18. // The 3RD International Conference on Orthodox Church Music «State, Church and Nation in Orthodox Church Music» Joensuu, Finland. 8 – 14 June 2009. – The International Society for Orthodox Church Music, 2010, p. 276-287.
13. Thibaut J.B. Monuments de la Notation ekphonetique et hagiopolite de l’eglise grecque. – S. Petersburg, 1913.
14. ΘΕΟΡΗΤΙΚΟΝ ΜΕΓΑ ΤΗΣ ΜΟΥΣΙΚΗΣ ΧΡΥΖΑΝΘΟY ΤΟY ΕΚ ΜΑΔΥΤΟΝ¸ ΕΝ TΕΡΓΕΣΤΗ¸ 1832, 222 p. + 66 p.