Formation of Violin Performance in 18th Century Russia

Article Sidebar

PDF (Русский)
Published: Nov 12, 2012

Main Article Content

Ekaterina E. Bakhtiyarova
The Rostov state Conservatory of S. V. Rakhmaninov

Abstract

The article is devoted to examining the processes of formation of professional violin performance in Russia. The author examines this issue in interrelation with the overall cultural tendencies of that time period. It is emphasized that the young Russian musical culture was absorbing into itself the achievements of the European violin schools, directing itself towards the mastery of the best violinists-composers of that time who represented various national traditions. The advancement of Russian musicians bore witness to the formation of the Russian school violin performance during these years.

Keywords: Russian violin performance, Western European violinists in Russia, concert life in Russia, influence of foreign schools

Article Details

How to Cite
Bakhtiyarova, E. E. (2012). Formation of Violin Performance in 18th Century Russia. Music Scholarship / Problemy Muzykal’noj Nauki, 11(2), 89–93. Retrieved from https://musicscholar.ru/index.php/PMN/article/view/360
Issue
No. 2 (2012): Music Scholarship / Problemy Muzykal'noj Nauki
Section
Musical Performance and Pedagogy

Copyright

The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.

Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.

The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).

Licenses

All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.

PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.

 

Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship

The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.

1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:

1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.

2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.

3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.

4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.

2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.

3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.

4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.

5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.

6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.

7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.

8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.

9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.

Author Biography

Ekaterina E. Bakhtiyarova, The Rostov state Conservatory of S. V. Rakhmaninov

post-graduate student

References

1. Асафьев Б. Об исследовании русской музыки XVIII века и двух операх Бортнянского // Музыка и музыкальный быт старой России. – Л.: Академия, 1927. – С. 7–29.
2. Гинзбург Л., Григорьев В. История скрипичного искусства. Вып 1. – М.: Музыка, 1990.
3. Гордина Е. Мван Мане Ярнович – легенда европейской музыки XVIII века // Музыкальная культу ра Сербии, Хорватии, Словении. – М.: Музыка, 2008.– С. 202–235.
4. Гуревич В. Антонио Лолли – на пересечении с Россией // Композиторы «второго ряда» в истори-ко-культурном процессе: сб. ст. / ред.-сост. А. Цукер; Ростовская государственная консерватория. – М.: Композитор, 2010. – С. 101–128.
5. Кандинский А., Келдыш Ю., Левашёва О. История русской музыки. Ч. 1. – М.: Музыка, 1972.
6. Левашёва О. Введение // История русской музыки: в 10 т. – М.: Музыка, 1984. – Т. 2: XVIII век, ч.1. – С. 5–29.
7. Ливанова Т. Русская музыкальная культура XVIII века в её связях с литературой, театром и бытом. Т. 1. – М.: Музгиз, 1953.
8. Музалевский В. Русское фортепианное искусство. – М.: Музгиз, 1961.
9. Огаркова Н. Антон Фердинанд Тиц и петербургская культура // Музыкальный Петербург: энциклопедический словарь. – СПб.: Композитор, 2002.– Т. 6. – С. 250–278.
10. Порфирьева А. Джон Абрахам Фишер // Музыкальный Петербург: энциклопедический словарь. – СПб.: Композитор, 1999. – Т. 3. – С. 193.
11. Раабен Л. История русского и советского скрипичного искусства: учеб. пособие. – М.; Л.: Музыка, 1978.
12. Соколова А. Концертная жизнь // История русской музыки: в 10 т. – М.: Музыка, 1985. – Т. 3: XVIII век, ч. 2. – С. 242–275.
13. Соколова А. Хронологическая таблица. Концертная жизнь // История русской музыки: в 10 т. – М.: Музыка, 1985. – Т. 3: XVIII век, ч. 2. – С. 400–415.
14. Столпянский П. Музыка и музицирование в старом Петербурге. – Л.: Музыка, 1989.
15. Фесечко Г. И. Е. Хандошкин: монографический очерк. – Л.: Музыка, 1972.
16. Финдейзен Н. Очерки по истории музыки в России с начала до конца XVIII века. Т. 1, вып. 2. – М.; Л.: Музгиз, 1929.
17. Штелин Я. Музыка и балет в России XVIII века. – СПб., 2002.
18. Ямпольский И. Русское скрипичное искусство. – Л.: Музыка, 1951.