“The Signs of the Sounds” in Jukka Tiensuu’s Music for Accordion
Main Article Content
Abstract
Jukka Tiensuu (1948) is a contemporary Finnish composer, pianist, harpsichordist and conductor. He has written
compositions for solo performers and for various ensembles of instruments, including those incorporating accordion.
In Finland the accordion has undergone its own path of development, but until recently mostly traditional, folk
music was performed on it. Jukka Tiensuu shared his aesthetical views about the art of composition in his lecture
“The Future of Music” which he read on April 16, 2000 at the University of California in San Diego. Each one of
his compositions is unlike the other one, cardinally differing in terms of form, content and manifestation of the
composer’s conception. Of considerable interest are his solutions in the sphere of notation of the musical text.
Every composition of his is supplied by the composer’s annotation describing the principles of performance of
various particular extended techniques, as well as the overall form of the composition. A comparative analysis of
compositions by Jukka Tiensuu with those by other contemporary composers shows that his means of notations are
situated within the general framework of the general tendencies of modernism.
Keywords: Julla Tiensuu, accordion, modernism, composers of Finland, contemporary notation.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Akho K. Finskaya muzyka posle Sibeliusa i stanovlenie muzykal’nogo iskusstva Finlyandii: doklad [Aho K. Finnish Music after Sibelius and the Formation of the Musical Art in Finland: Report]. Helsinki, 1989. 26 p.
3. Dubinets E.A. Znaki zvukov. O sovremennoy muzykal’noy notatsii [The Signs of Sounds. About Modern Musical Notation]. Kiev: Gamayun, 1999. 314 p.
4. Kompozitory o sovremennoy kompozitsii: khrestomatiya [Composers about Contemporary Composition: a Chrestomathy]. Edited by T. S. Kyuregyan, V. S. Tsenova. Moscow: Moskovskaya konservatoriya, 2009. 356 p.
5. Korkhonen K. Kompozitory Finlyandii ot srednevekov’ya do nashikh dney [Korhonen K. The Composers of Finland from the Middle Ages to the Present Day]. Edited By A. Toivonen. Translated from the Finnish by A. Gladkov. 2nd Edition. Helsinki: Finnish Music Information Center Fimic, 2008. 248 p.
6. Lavrova S. V. Slozhnost’ i transgressiya v sovremennoy muzyke [Complexity and Transgression in Contemporary Music]. Ot russkogo Serebryanogo veka k Novomu Renessansu: sb. st. po mat-lam Mezhdunar. foruma k 80-letiyu Sergeya Slonimskogo (4–7 aprelya 2012 goda) [From the Russian Silver Age to the New Renaissance: Compilation of Articles, based on the Mat Lamas Intern. Forum commemorating the 80th Anniversary of Sergei Slonimsky (4-7 April 2012)]. Compiler and Scholarly Editor: R. N. Slonimskaya, R. G. Shitikova. St. Petersburg: Lennex Corp.; Edinburgh, 2014. 594 p.
7. Martynov V. I. Konets vremeni kompozitora [The End of the Age of Composer]. Moscow: Russkiy put’, 2002. 130 p.
8. Myatieva N. A. Ispolnitel’skaya interpretasiya muzyki vtoroy poloviny XX veka: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya [Performers’ Interpretation of Music of the Second Half of the Twentieth Century: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Moscow, 2010. 86 p.
9. Naumenko T. I. Tekstologiya muzykal’noy nauki [Textology of Musical Scholarship]. Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoy mysli, 2013. 584 p.
10. Ruchyevskaya E. A. «Tristan» Vagnera, «Ruslan» Glinki, «Snegurochka» Rimskogo-Korsakova. Stil’. Dramaturgiya. Slovo i muzyka [Wagner’s “Tristan,” Glinka’s “Ruslan,” Rimsky-Korsakov’s “The Snow Maiden.” Style. Dramaturgy. Words and Music]. St. Petersburg: Kompozitor, 2002. 396 p.
11. Tsaregradskaya T. V. Brayan Fernikhou: ocharovanie muzykal’nogo zhesta [Brian Ferneyhough: the Charm of the Musical Gesture]. Nauchnyy vestnik Moskovskoy konservatorii [Scholarly Bulletin of the Moscow Conservatory]. 2014. № 2, pp. 154–175.
12. Kolehmainen I. The Accordeon in Finnish Folk Musik. Finish Music Quatorly. 1989. № 2, pp. 29–32.
13. Korhonen K. Finnish Concertos. Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy: Jyvaskyla, 1995. 88 p.
14. Korhonen K. Finnish Composers. Since the 1960-s. Finnish Music Information Centre, 1995. 158 p.
15. Aniskin E. Bayan i akkordeon, otlichie [The Bayan and Accordion, Differences]. URL: http:// eugenmeermann.ru/bayan-i-akkordeon/bayan-i-akkordeon-otlitshie (14.09.2016).
16. Kompozitory ot «A» do «Ya». Klaus Huber [Composers from “A” to “Z”. Klaus Huber]. URL: http:// www.ccmm.ru/index.php?page=composers&composer= huberk. (14.09.2016).
17. Petrov V. «Opus contra naturam» Brayana Fyornikhou: verbal’nye smysly v muzykal’nom kontekste [“Opus contra naturam” by Brian Ferneyhough: Verbal Meanings in the Musical Context]. Izrail’ XXI [Israel XXI]. 2010. № 6 (24). URL: http://www.21israel-music. com/Fernihow.htm.
18. Kurkela V., Tikka M. The Accordion in Finland – an Instrument of Contradictions. URL: http://www. fmq.fi/?s=The+accordion+in+Finland+%E2%80%93+a n+instrument+of+contradictions. (14.09.2016).
19. Tiensuu J. The future of music. Edited by Roger Reynolds and Karen Reynolds. Online publishing and editing by Karen Reynolds. SEARCH EVENT I, 16 April 2000, University of California, San Diego. URL: http:// www.rogerreynolds.com/futureofmusic/tiensuu.html. (09.14.2016).