The Rostov Branch of the Imperial Russian Musical Society: the First Decade of its Work
Main Article Content
Abstract
Imperial Russian Musical Society during the irst ten years of
its existence (1896–1907). The historical background of its
emergence on the foundation of the Musical Amateurs’ Union is
revealed. On the basis of archival sources – reports of the Rostov
Branch of the Imperial Russian Musical Society – research is
made of the concert life of Rostov-on-Don, and the primary role
of the musicians of the union is revealed. A summary table of
the concerts, as well as information of the concert programs and
posters is presented, and illustrations of some of the preserved
documents are given.
The article emphasizes the signiicance of the regional
branch of the Russian Musical Society. During the ten years
of their enlightening and educational activities, the musicians
were able to vitalize the concert life of the city, and also to
enhance musical education and bring it onto a crucially different
professional level.
Keywords: Imperial Russian Musical Society, the Rostov
Branch of the Imperial Russian Musical Society, musical life in
Russia, M. L. Presman
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Krylova A. V. «Istoriya muzyki vsekh vremyon i narodov» L. Sakketti [“The History of Music of all Times and Peoples” by Liveriy Sacchetti] // Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2014, No. 1 (14), pp. 70–74.
3. Meshcheryakova N. A. RMO na Donu: radius vozdeystviya [The Russian Musical Society in the Don Region: the Radius of Influence]. Russkoe muzykal’noe obshchestvo (1859–1917): istoriya otdeleniy [The Russian Musical Society (1859–1917): The History of the Departments]. Author and Compiler A. R. Glushkova. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, 2012, pp. 339–356.
4. Ob’yavleniya [Advertisements]. Priazovskiy kray. 1893, No. 300–306.
5. Orekhova A. Yu. Rol’ M. L. Presmana v proekte «Pervaya Sovetskaya opera» v Rostove-na-Donu [The Role of M. L. Presman in the Project of “The First Soviet Opera” in Rostov-on- Don]. Yuzhno-Rossiyskiy muzykal’nyy al’manakh. [South-Russian Musical Anthology]. 2014, No. 1 (14), pp. 8–13.
6. Orekhova A. Yu. Stanovlenie i razvitie Soyuza orkestrantov v Rostove-na-Donu (1906–1920 gg.) [Establishment and Development of the Orchestral Musicians’ Union in Rostov-on-Don (1906–1920)]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research]. 2013, No. 11–6, pp. 1259–1263.
7. Puzyrevskiy A. I. Imperatorskoe Russkoe muzykal’noe obshchestvo v pervye 50 let ego deyatel’nosti (1859–1909) [The Imperial Russian Musical Society in the First 50 years of its Activities (1859–1909)]. St. Petersburg, 1909. 48 p.
8. Teatr i muzyka [Theatre and Music]. Donskaya pchela. 1889, No. 32.
9. Otchyoty Rostovskogo-na-Donu otdeleniya Imperatorskogo Russkogo muzykal’nogo obshchestva i sostoyashchikh pri nyom muzykal’nykh klassov (s 1900 g. – muzykal’nogo uchilishcha) za 1896–1907 gg. [Reports of the Rostov-on-Don Branch of the Imperial Russian Musical Society and the Music Classes Organized by It (from 1900, the Music College) during the Years 1896–1907]. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Rostovskoy oblasti (GARO) [State Archive of the Rostov Region]. Spravochno-informatsionnyy fond, inv. nomer [Reference collection, inventory number] 9648, 9649, 9650, 9651, 9652, 7125, 9653, 9654, 7126, 9655.