The Synesthetic Aspect of Interpretation in the Genre of Opera (On the Example of Piotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s “The Queen of Spades”)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to analysis of the issue of step-by-step multilevel interpretation from the perspective of the scenic rendition of opera. The author incorporates a synesthetic approach which makes it possible to examine the profound non-verbal forms of formation of meaning in an artistic text. On the example of Tchaikovsky’s opera “The Queen of Spades” in the production of Graham Vick (at the Glyndebourne Festival) there is an examination of the hidden mechanisms of inter-sensual associations in the process of the “translation” of Pushkin’s text into other forms of art. In regard to the analysis of the interpretation of production in the genre of opera the notion of the non-verbal concept is incorporated for the first time, which makes it possible to research the mechanism of the non-verbal semantic “re-expression” between the various planes in an opera performance – the verbal, musical and scenographic.
Keywords: interpretation of production in the genre of opera, Graham Vick, a synesthetic approach to an opera performance
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Galeev B. M. Chelovek, iskusstvo, tekhnika: (problema sinestezii v iskusstve). – Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1987.
3. Ermakova O. P. Kontsept «bezumie» s tochki zreniya yazyka // Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Kosmos i khaos: kontseptual'nye polya poryadka i besporyadka / otv. red. N. D. Arutyunova. – M., 2003. – S. 108–117.
4. Zhinkin N. I. Yazyk. Rech'. Tvorchestvo. – M.: Labirint, 1998.
5. Zusman V. G. Dialog i kontsept v literature. Literatura i muzyka. – N. Novgorod: Rekom, 2001.
6. Kandinskiy V. V. O dukhovnom v iskusstve. – L.: Leningradskaya galereya, 1990.
7. Kolyadenko N. P. «Boris Godunov» A. S. Pushkina v svete problemy khudozhestvennogo sinteza // A. S. Pushkin i russkaya khudozhestvennaya kul'tura. – Novosibirsk, 1999. – S. 52–67.
8. Kolyadenko N. P. Sinestetichnost' muzykal'no-khudozhestvennogo soznaniya (na materiale iskusstva KhKh veka). – Novosibirsk: Novosibirskaya gos. konservatoriya, 2005.
9. Pavilenis R. I. Problema smysla. – M.: Mysl', 1983.
10. Sintsov E. V., Sintsova S. V. Fenomeny vlasti v khudozhestvenno-filosofskom osmyslenii. – Kazan': v Kazanskiy gos. energ. un-t, 2008.
11. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty. Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. Opyt issledovaniya. – M.: Shkola «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury», 1997.
12. Toporov V. N. Peterburgskiy tekst. – M.: Nauka, 2009.
13. Yarustovskiy B. M. Opernaya dramaturgiya Chaykovskogo. – M.; L.: Muzgiz, 1947.