"Thinking in Functions" and "Thinking in Substances": Two Creative Principles in Art
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to the embodiment in art of two worldview opposite concepts – a problem that has occupied art criticism from antiquity to the present day. The first concept is based on a human, on the embodiment of his feelings in the area of the visible world. At the center of the second one there is the being as such (ontos), its substantive forces, that carry out their manifestation through the artistic language matter. The article presents various dichotomous definitions of the two artistic systems; one of them (by S.S. Averintsev) is included in the article’s title.
Behind the fact of distinguishing artistic concepts the article sets the task to define (general characterization) the respectively opposite linguistic principles corresponding to this or that system of world-understanding. At the same time, more attention is paid to the less familiar and theoretically developed problem – the characteristic of the “substantive” concept, the peculiarities of its linguistic embodiment in art. Taking into account the necessity of not direct but symbolic embodiment of the “supersensible”, the author of the article refers to such philosophical and aesthetic concepts of the past and present as “eidos” (antiquity), “anagogy”, “energy” (medieval hermeneutics), “removal of certainty” (N. Kuzansky), “existentiality” (L. Ginzburg), “ontological hypostasis” (V. Bychkov), and the terms of the Holy Bible.
The article gives more concrete linguistic manifestations of two types of thinking and puts the issue of parallelism and the possibility of realizing substantival qualities in the functional type texts. In music, substantiality is put in parallel with modality. The forms of such appearance of the modal through the functional are illustrated by the example of melodic and intonation patterns of romances by of M.I. Glinka.
Keywords: Artistic worldview, language and thinking, ontological image, S.S. Averintsev, modality and functionality, M.I. Glinka.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.