The Vocal Symphony in the Interpretation of Leif Segerstam and Pehr Henrik Nurdgren
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present article analyzes the approach toward the genre of the vocal symphony of two contemporary symphonic composers – Leif Segerstam and Pehr Henrik Nurdgren; analysis is given to Segerstam’s Symphony No.14 “Moments of Peace III” and Nurdgren’s Sixth Symphony “Interdependence” (1999–2000), which have different orchestral ensembles and structure.
Segerstam’s symphony presents a 16-movement cycle for tenor and symphony orchestra and discloses a spectrum of feelings of its lyrical hero. The symphony combines sonoristic and aleatory techniques, reflecting the features intrinsic to Segerstam of the authorial “technique of free pulsation.” In this case the specificity of its realization is connected with the special role of the verbal text in the overall composition. According to the composer’s indications, the aphorisms of John Brown, which lie at the symphony’s foundation, have the option of not being sounded, since the soloist’s timbre during the process of performance is variable (either a voice or one of the instruments). Consequently, the text here preserves its connection with verbal notation: Segerstam used it in his first oeuvres created in his technique.
Nurdgren’s symphony draws different performance means: an orchestra, a chorus and two solo vocalists (a soprano and a tenor). The massive ensemble is determined by the composition’s theme: it is written on the text of the “Declaration of Interdependence,” the document which states the basic principles of environmental law. The symphony consists of three movements; all of their particular features (its composition, applied means of vocalization, etc.) are determined by the vocal text, since the directives of the “Declaration” serve as the predominating element in the composition.
Thereby, the analyzed compositions demonstrate the fluency of the vocal symphony, its ability to embody diverse types of content and artistic conceptions. At the same time, they demonstrate two paths along which this genre can develop. Being a hybrid genre in its nature, it brings in the means of a vocal cycle (Segerstam’s symphony) or a cantata or oratorio (Nurdgren’s symphony).
Keywords: vocal symphony, Leif Segerstam, Symphony No. 14 “Moments of Peace III,” John Brown, Pehr Henrik Nurdgren, Symphony No. 6 “Interdependence,” David Suzuki, Jan Sibelius, “Kullervo” symphony.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.