Piotr Tchaikovsky’s Third Piano Concerto and the Issue of Cyclicity
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines one of Piotr Tchaikovsky’s last compositions – the Concerto for Piano and Orchestra No. 3, its creation, comprehension and performance. The genre-related and, as a result, the cyclic issues of this compositions not possessing univocal interpretation in contemporary scholarly literature come out to the foreground. Having been relegated to the periphery of performance practice, the Third Piano Concerto has acquired the reputation of an “unsuccessful composition” and has disappeared from the repertoire of pianists for a lengthy period of time. However, the interest in its “symphonic prototype” – the unfinished symphony in E-flat major — as well as its edition by Semyon Bogatyryov and its performance have once again aroused interest in the concerto. The issue of cyclicity of this composition has substantially become sharpened: some performers incline towards the one-movement version, while others prefer the three-movement version. In this context the necessity arose of carrying out the analysis of the authorial genre-related terminology and the attention towards epistolary material (letters of Piotr and Modest Tchaikovsky, Alexander Siloti, Sergei Taneyev, Mitrofan Belyayev), which had direct connection to the fate of the Third Piano Concerto. The outcome of the work was the conclusion about the validity of the existence of the three-movement version as the Third Piano Concerto, while the genre status of the one-movement must be
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 19-312-90053.
Keywords: Tchaikovsky’s Third Piano Concerto, Andante and Finale, Konzertstück, unfinished symphony, Louis Diémer, late romantic art.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.