From the Regional Section of the Imperial Russian Musical Society to the Conservatory: the Formation of Professional Musical Education in Nizhny Novgorod
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to study of the main stages of formation of the tradition of professional musical education in Nizhny Novgorod. Definition is given to the key factors which conditioned the establishment in 1873 of the Nizhny Novgorod Section of the Imperial Russian Musical Society (IRMS) and specified the directions of its activities. The essential specific features of the founding in 1907 of a Musical College in the city and the enlightening activities of its employees and students are demonstrated. The most significant premises are brought to light, as is the argumentation of the necessity of the establishment in 1946 of the Conservatory, which has become a contemporary center of academic musical culture in the region. Basing themselves on archival sources, as well as on publications of recent years, the authors come to conclusions about the connection of recurrent and random factors, which determined the particularities of the formation of the Nizhny Novgorod musical enlightenment. Argumentation is given to the decisive significance in the given process of collaboration of professional musicians, musically gifted Nizhny Novgorod residents, as well as patrons. The present unity turned out to be decisive not only in the strengthening of positions in education, but also in the activation of the spheres of concert enlightenment, musical criticism and musical scholarship. In conclusion, substantiation is given to the necessity of further search for historical testimonies and their description with the aim of reconstruction of an integral model of development of musical education in Nizhny Novgorod.
Keywords: The Nizhny Novgorod Section of the Imperial Russian Musical Society, Musical College, conservatory, professional musical education, musical enlightenment.
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Berdnikova N. P., Kolesnikov V. S. “…Nizhegorodskoye otdeleniye IRMO bylo skromnoye nachinaniye nemnogikh lyubiteley iskusstva…” (K 140-letiyu so dnya osnovaniya) [“...The Nizhny Novgorod Section of the Imperial Russian Musical Society was a Modest Undertaking of a Small Number of Art Lovers...” (Towards the 140th Anniversary of Its Foundation)]. Russkoe muzykal'noe obshchestvo 1859–1917: Istoriya otdeleniy [The Russian Musical Society 1859–1917: History of the Sections]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2012, pp. 191–224.
3. Imena muzykal'noy epokhi: k 60-letiyu Nizhegorodskoy konservatorii [Names of the Musical Epoch: Towards the 60th Anniversary of the Nizhny Novgorod Conservatory]. Compiled and edited by T. B. Sidneva, B. S. Getselev. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Conservatory, 2007. 188 p.
4. Kirnoze Z. I. K istokam Nizhegorodskoy konservatorii: Vasiliy Yul'yevich Villuan (1850–1922) i Imperatorskoe Russkoe muzykal'noe obshchestvo [Towards the Origins of the Nizhny Novgorod Conservatory: Vassily Yulievich Villuan (1850–1922) and the Imperial Russian Musical Society]. Aktual'nye problemy vysshego muzykal'nogo obrazovaniya [Topical Issues of Higher Musical Education]. 2018. No. 1 (47), pp. 18–23.
5. Kollar V. A. Muzykal'naya zhizn' Nizhnego Novgoroda – goroda Gor'kogo [The Musical Life of Nizhny Novgorod – the City of Gorky]. Gorky: Volga-Vyatka book publishing house, 1976. 176 p.
6. Krylova A. V. The Role of the Imperial Russian Musical Society in the Formation of the Musical Infrastructure of Rostov-on-Don. Problemy muzykal'noj nauki/Music Scholarship. 2016. No. 1, pp. 83–89. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17674/1997-0854.2016.1.083-089.
7. Kuzina O. P. Nikolay Grigor'yevich Rubinshteyn: zhizn', dela, sovremenniki [Nikolai Grigoryevich Rubinstein: Life, Affairs, Contemporaries]. Nikolay Rubinshteyn i yego vremya: al'bom (K 150-letiyu Moskovskoy konservatorii) [Nikolai Rubinstein and His Time: Album (Towards the 150th Anniversary of the Moscow Conservatory)]. Edited and compiled by M. D. Sokolova. Moscow, 2002, pp. 4–43.
8. Nizhegorodskaya gosudarstvennaya konservatoriya (akademiya) imeni M. I. Glinki (1946–2011) [Glinka Nizhny Novgorod State Conservatory (Academy)]. Editor-in-chief J. Groisman. Nizhny Novgorod: Decom, 2013. 208 p.
9. Poluektova N. N. Deyateli muzykal'nogo prosveshcheniya v Nizhnem Novgorode [Public Figures of Musical Enlightenment in Nizhny Novgorod]. Iz muzykal'nogo proshlogo [From the Musical Past]. Edited and compiled by B. S. Shteynpress. Issue 2. Moscow, 1965, pp. 141–177.
10. Russkoe muzykal'noe obshchestvo 1859–1917: Istoriya otdeleniy [The Russian Musical Society 1859–1917: History of the Sections]. Editorial, introductory article by O. R. Glushkova. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2012. 536 p.
11. Skryabin A. N. Pis'ma [Letters]. Edited and compiled by A. V. Kashperov. Moscow: Muzyka, 2003. 736 p.
12. Gorodilova M., Korobova A., Polotskaya E., Shabalina L. First Conservatoire in the Urals: From the History of Russian Musical Education. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Art Studies: Science, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2017). January, 2018, pp. 345–349. DOI:10.2991/icassee-17.2018.78.
13. Sargeant L. M. A New Class of People: The Conservatoire and Musical Professionalization in Russia, 1861– 1917. Music & Letters. 2004. Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 41–61.