The Phenomenon of “Non-Verbal” Prayer in the Religious-Philosophical Instrumental Compositions by Sofia Gubaidulina
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines from a new persective Sofia Gubaidulina’s instrumental compositions. The concept of “non-verbal” prayer is introduced in relation to the composer’s religious-philosophical compositions. The essence of the concept is disclosed, and it is philosophically comprehended. The author outlines important argumentative parallels: she establishes the interconnection of prayer with dialogue, the essence of the „dialectics“ of prayer reveals the meditative nature and the possibility oft he non-verbal existence of prayer. Spiritual Revelation becomes the leading sphere of the content of the instrumental music. The meditative and the sacred become unified by a common meaning, the core of which is formed by the purefying element as the highest expression of spirituality. The leading conception is presented by the Christian tragedy with the zone of Enlightenment and Transfiguration at the end ofthe composition. The author discloses these regular occurrences on the example of the Concerto for Piano and Chamber Orchestra „Introitus,“ the piece for bayan „De profundis” and the Partita “The Seven Last Words of Christ” for cello, bayan and string instruments. The composer recites a prayer and carries out church service in the literal meaning, albeit not in the walls of a church, but through a deep immersion into the creative act.
Keywords: Sofia Gubaidulina, Concerto for Piano and Chamber Orchestra “Introitus,” “De profundis” for bayan, “The Seven Last Words of Christ” – Partita for Cello, Bayan and String Instruments, prayer, meditation
Article Details
Copyright
The rights on the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization are protected in accordance with Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authorship, author's name, executor’s name, inviolability of the work and result of execution are protected by the rules of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the author or executor, regardless of providing legal protection of such results of intellectual activity at the time of their forming.
Copyright laws regulate the civil legal relations for using works of science, literature and art. Such relationships are formed as the result of the author’s writing his or her texts. In this case the author can rightfully claim copyright of the work.
The author has certain rights to reuse the work (see: “Ethical Aspects in Terms of Multifold Publications).
Licenses
All copyrights on the articles belong to their authors. The author transfers the rights on using the article the publisher.
PDF versions of scholarly articles of the journal PMN are published by using the license Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives cc by-nc-nd, allowing loading and distributing works on the assumption of indicating the authorship. The works may not be changed in any way or used for commercial interests.
Criteria for Authorship, Co-authorship
The term “author” refers to all persons (co-authors) who have made a substantial contribution to conducting the research and creation of the manuscript and responsible for its content. The person (author) who has submitted the manuscript to the editorial board shall bear responsibility for the complete list of the group of authors and the changes made to the manuscript in accordance with the results of the peer reviewing and editing.
1. Authorship is based on the following criteria:
1) The author made a substantial contribution to the research activity and development of concept, collected the data, made analysis and interpretation of the data.
2) The author carried out the writing of the text of draft articles and edited it attentively and substantially.
3) The author approved the final version of the article prior to its submission.
4) The author bears responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript.
2. The authors shall guarantee that the submitted manuscript is the original work.
3. Scholarly reviews for some issue or other should be objective, present material in a wide range and at the same time take into account the views of the author of the review.
4. The authorship of scholarly publications is obligated to reflect accurately the contribution of individuals to the research activity, with specific information about the authors.
5. The authors may not mislead the readers by publishing acknowledgements of gratitude to people who were not actually involved in writing the work. Other persons who made contribution to the work, but are nevertheless not the authors, may be listed in the rubric of “Acknowledgements,” with indications of the type and extent of their activities.
6. Authors are obligated to provide a description of their contribution to the publication.
7. The order of authorship must be a joint resolution of co-authors. The authors should be ready to explain the order of their enumeration and listing.
8. The authors shall be entirely responsible for the correct definition of authorship acting in accordance with the rules adopted in their institution.
9. Investigators must ensure that only those persons who meet the criteria for authorship (that made a significant contribution to the work), shall be considered the authors, and the researchers who do not merit authorship will be excluded from the list of authors.
References
2. Bonfeld M. Sh. Muzyka: Yazyk. Rech’. Myshlenie. Opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya muzykal’nogo iskusstva [Music: Language. Speech. Thinking. The Experience of Systematic Music Research]. St. Petersburg: Kompozitor Press, 2006. 648 p.
3. Gulyanitskaya N. S. Poetika muzykal’noy kompozitsii: Teoreticheskie aspekty russkoy dukhovnoy muzyki XX veka [The Poetics of Musical Composition. Theoretical Aspects of 20th Century Russian Sacred Music]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, 2002. 432 p.
4. Kaloshina G. E. Problemy kontseptsii i stanov¬lenie «intonatsionnoy fabuly» v pozdnikh simfoniyakh Antona Bruknera [Issues of Concept and the Formation of “Intonation-based Narration” in the Late Sympho¬nies of Anton Bruckner]. Yuzhnorossiyskiy muzykal’nyy al’manakh [South Russian Musical Almanac]. 2005, No. 1, pp.159–168.
5. Kuznetsova M. V. Meditativnost’ kak svoystvo muzykal’nogo myshleniya: Avet Terteryan, Arvo Pyart, Valentin Sil’vestrov: dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya [Meditative Qualities as a Trait of Musical Thinking: Avet Terteryan, Arvo Pärt, Valentin Silvestrov: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Moscow, 2007. 233 p.
6. Mironova U. A. Proizvedeniya Sofii Gubaydulinoy dlya bayana: dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya [Compositions by Sofia Gubaidulina for Bayan: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Moscow, 2008. 170 p.
7. Popovskaya O. I. Simvolizm kak vyrazhenie religioznoy kontseptsii tvorchestva S. Gubaydulinoy [Symbolism as an Expression of the Religious Concept in the Music of Sofia Gubaidulina]. Sb. tr. RAM im. Gnesinykh [Compilation of Articles from the Gnesins’ Russian Academy of Music]. Issue 136. Moscow, 1996, pp. 146–163.
8. Rozanov V. V. M. Nesterov [Mikhail Nesterov]. Filosofiya russkogo religioznogo iskusstva [The Philosophy of Russian Religious Art]. Volume 1. Moscow, 1993, pp. 152–158.
9. Sokolov O. V. Morfologicheskaya sistema muzyki i ee khudozhestvennye zhanry [The Morphological System of Music and its Artistic Genres]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University, 1994. 220 p.
10. «Sofii – s lyubovyu». K 80-letiyu Sofii Asgatovny Gubaydulinoy: nauch. tr. Moskovskoy gosudarstvennoy konservatorii im. P. I. Chaikovskogo [“To Sofia – with Love.” Towards the 80th Anniversary of Sofia A. Gubaidulina: Musicological Articles of the Moscow State P. I. Tchaikovsky Conservatory]. Edited by V. N. Kholopova. Moscow, 2014. 184 p.
11. Feofan Episkop. Put’ ko spaseniyu. Nachertaniya khristianskogo nravoucheniya [Archbishop Theophanes The Path towards Salvation. Outlines Christian Morality]. Moscow, 1899. P. 3, pp. 238–314.
12. Kholopova V. N., Restagno E. Sofiya Gubaidulina: monograficheskoe issledovanie (Zhizn’ pamyati; Shag dushi) [Cofiya Gubaidulina: Monographic Study (Life of Memory; A Step of the Soul)]. Moscow: Kompozitor Press, 1996. 349 p.
13. Shevtsova I. V. Traktovka violoncheli v muzyke Sofii Gubaidulinoy i novatsii violonchel’noy tekhniki vtoroy poloviny XX veka [Interpretation of the Cello in the Music of Sofia Gubaidulina and Innovations of 20th Century Cello Technique]. Problemy muzykal’noy nauki [Music Scholarship]. 2013, No. 2 (13), pp. 220–224.
14. Shiriyeva N. V. Printsipy strukturnoy organizatsii khorovykh sochineniy Sofii Gubaydulinoy: dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya [The Principles of Structural Organization of Sofia Gubaidulina’s Choral Compositions: Thesis of Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Arts]. Saratov, 2011. 238 p.